Case law

Board of Education v. Nolte Tillar Bros. Construction Co.

71 Ohio App. 469 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1943

Co. v Adams Mfg Co., 128 Fed. (2d) 411. The plaintiff had a right to arbitration. It waived such right by bringing the action. The defendant Construction Company had the right to arbitration. … Jur. 613, §570; Hiller et al. v Shaw, 45 Oh Ap 303, 305; Bank & Trust Co. v Trust Co., 56 Oh Ap 309, 315. The trial court ordered a new trial. In this order we find no error, prejudicial to the appellants.

Wieging v. Jennings Local School Board of Education

55 Ohio App. 2d 110 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1977

Gandy, v. Bd. of Edn. (1971), 26 Ohio St. 2d 115 ; Majoewsky v. Indian Hill Exempted Village School Dist., unpublished, Hamilton County Court of Appeals, No. … Brubaker, v. Hardy (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d 103 ; and State, ex rel. Ford, v. Bd. of Edn. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 124 . .

Northampton Building Co. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

109 Ohio App. 3d 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1996

Brown v. Cleveland (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 93, 95 , 20 O.O.3d 88, 89 , 420 N.E.2d 103, 105 . … Brown v. Cleveland (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 93, 96 , 20 O.O.3d 88, 90 , 420 N.E.2d 103, 106 . Accordingly, appellant’s fourth assignment of error is overruled. Judgment affirmed. Quillin, P.J., and Slaby, J., concur. .

Licking County Agricultural Soc v. Board of County Commissioners

48 Ohio App. 528 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1934

The Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society, by reason of the conveyance of this property to it by the Board of County Commissioners, is in privity with said Board of County Commissioners, which board was the grantee … So that we are of the opinion that The Licking County Agricultural Society had the lawful authority to convey this property to the Board of County Commissioners of Licking County and that said Board of County Commissioners

State Ex Rel. Youngs v. Board of Elections

81 Ohio App. 209 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1947

The respondent board of elections demurred to the petition on the ground that the relatrix had an adequate remedy at law, especially as provided in Section 3531, G-eneral Code. Looking to State, ex rel. Stanley, v. … Cline, v.

Columbus Board of Education v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

89 Ohio App. 3d 846 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1993

See Hernandez Jimenez v. Calero Toledo (C.A.1, 1979), 604 F.2d 99, 102-103 , and Stauffer v. Isaly Dairy Co. (1965), 4 Ohio App.2d 15 , 33 O.O.2d 44 , 211 N.E.2d 72 . … In Van Fossen v.

Laketran Board of Trustees v. City of Mentor

135 Ohio App. 3d 187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1999

In Taylor v. … GTE Wireless of Midwest Inc. v. Anderson Twp. (1999), 134 Ohio App.3d 352 , 731 N.E.2d 201 .

DeCesare v. Niles City School District Board of Education

154 Ohio App. 3d 644 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2003

Knussman v. Maryland (D.C.Md.1998), 16 F.Supp.2d 601, 608 . 5 . Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts, 96 Ohio St.3d 240 , 2002-Ohio-3994 , 773 N.E.2d 526 , at ¶ 13, quoting Ragsdale v. … Id. at 664 , 742 N.E.2d 164 , citing Taylor v. Phoenixville School Dist., supra; and Taylor v. Principal Fin. Group, Inc. (C.A.5, 1996), 93 F.3d 155 . 17 . Kent State Univ. v. Ohio Civ.

Nead v. Brown County General Hospital, Ca2005-09-018 (5-21-2007)

2007 Ohio 2443 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 21, 2007

Bruni v. … See Huebner v. Miles (1993), 92 Ohio App.3d 493 , 50; Nickey v. Brown (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 32 , 34 . *Page 5 {¶ 18} The trial court ruled that appellant's disclosure that Dr.

Copley Township Board of Trustees v. W.J. Horvath Co.

193 Ohio App. 3d 286 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 2011

State v. Evans (1994), 93 Ohio App.3d 121, 124 , 637 N.E.2d 969 . … Anderson v. Indus. Comm. (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 170, 172 , 9 OBR 456, 459 N.E.2d 548 ; see also State v.

In Re Jack Fish Sons, Inc.

159 Ohio App. 3d 649 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2005

This, too, is unacceptable, but, in view of the fact that we accept the appellant’s brief notwithstanding its flaws, we do the same for the board. 2 . We are cognizant of the decision in Brown v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. … As Justice Wright noted in his dissent in Brown, supra, at 3 , 635 N.E.2d 1230 , all prior Ohio Supreme Court decisions on the matter had phrased the issue as being whether the board’s decision was supported by reliable,

Brannen v. Kings Local School District Board of Education

144 Ohio App. 3d 620 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2001

Jones v. Shelly Co. (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 440 , 666 N.E.2d 316 . … Accordingly, the State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”) has exclusive jurisdiction to resolve charges of unfair labor practices and other matters committed to it pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4117. E. Cleveland v. E.

State ex rel. Farley v. Board of Education

82 Ohio Law. Abs. 392 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1958

of education, and he should not rely on others to take it to that board. … Rutherford, v. Barberton Board of Education, 148 Oh St 242, and the conclusion reached in State, ex rel. Foster, v. Madison Twp. Board of Education, 151 Oh St 413. Our case here is not similar to those cases.

Shawnee Education Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board

139 Ohio App. 3d 381 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 2000

In Ohio Council 8, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. … South Community, Inc. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 224 , 527 N.E.2d 864 . R.C. 4117.02(M) states that “the board is subject to Chapter 119. of the Revised Code.”

State Ex Rel. Carmean v. Board of Education

112 Ohio App. 248 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 25, 1959

See, also, Stilwell v. Board of Education of Hamilton County, 99 Ohio App., 65 , at page 72, 130 N. E. (2d), 857. … E., 805 ; and Board of Education of Berea Rural School District, Hamilton County, v. Board of Education of Hamilton County, 66 Ohio App., 267 , 31 N. E. (2d), 702.

Hackathorn v. Springfield Local School District Board of Education

94 Ohio App. 3d 319 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1994

McCloud v. Nimmer (1991), 72 Ohio App.3d 533, 539 , 595 N.E.2d 492, 496 . … unless it is made or authorized at a regular or special meeting of such board.”

Trebmal Construction, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

94 Ohio App. 3d 246 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1994

Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … “In Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Franklin Cty.

State ex rel. Compton v. Board of County Commrs.

18 Ohio App. 462 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1923

Boyd, v. McMaster, 29 O. C. … See, also, State v. Kuhner & King, 107 Ohio St., 406 . The three publications were made on three days, one week apart.

Bivins v. Ohio State Board of Emergency Medical Services

165 Ohio App. 3d 390 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 619, 621 , 614 N.E.2d 748 . However, our review of whether the board’s order is in accordance with the law is plenary. Id. Webb v. State Med. … Brown, the compliance examiner who investigated appellant’s alleged violation of the administrative code. We have thoroughly searched the record of this cause and cannot find a report authored by Brown.

Board of Education of City School District v. Ferguson

68 Ohio App. 514 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1941

Jur. 188, 189; Hudson v Board of Education, 41 Oh Ap 403, Perkins v Bright, 109 Oh St 14, Board of Education v Volk, 72 Oh St 469. Reed v Muhlenberg Township Board of Education, 6 O. N. P. … (N.S.) 526, Board of Education v Best, 52 Oh St 138, Board of Education v Brown, 81 Oh St 528, Board of Education v Griffith, 74 Oh St 80.