Case law

Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (7-21-1997)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1997

Cherry v. Cherry (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 348 , 356 . … Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 217 .

Board of Trustees of Mifflin Township v. State

38 Ohio App. 51 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1930

bridge to attend school; that said children have no other means of access to said school, and further that said foot bridge is in need -of said repairs, and that under the provisions of 7562-1 GC it is mandatory that the Board … It has been held that a lawful discretion vested in an individual, officer, board or corporation cannot be destroyed or limited by a writ of mandamus.

State ex rel. Bloom v. Cincinnati Board of Education

2 Ohio App. 40 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 22, 1913

From the record before us it appears that his position with the board of education was not that of an employe within the terms of the General Code, but was in the nature of a contract relation. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. v. … Eq., 252; Rogers v. Florence Rd. Co., 31 S. Car., 220. Judgment affirmed.

Maiden v. Fayette County Board of Retardation & Development Disabilities

16 Ohio App. 3d 196 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1984

Ogan, v. … “The above holding in no way conflicts with this court’s holding in Jackson v.

State ex rel. Johnson v. Board of Education

93 Ohio Law. Abs. 447 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1962

school district, to present the petition to the next meeting of the defendant, Board of Education, and to certify the proposal contained in said petition to the Columbiana County Board of Elections for action as directed … Brown, P. J., Donahue and Grieeith, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Berry v. Board of Education

11 Ohio Law. Abs. 254 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1932

The case of Brannon et al v. … In the case of State ex rel v. Board of Education, 11 Oh Ap 146, it is held: “1.

Board of Park Commissioners v. Glen Valley Club

12 Ohio Law. Abs. 333 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1932

As we look at it, however, we are not confronted with the actual question argued and relied upon by the park board. … For support of this position reliance is had upon the principle laid down in State v Toledo Home Telephone Co, 72 Oh St 60. We do not accept this view.

Department of Industrial Relations v. Board of Education

38 Ohio Law. Abs. 42 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1942

The bill of exceptions is very short, containing the evidence of five witnesses, one on behalf of the Department and four on behalf of the Board of Education. … The evidence presented on behalf of the Board of Education was directed mainly to two propositions: 1.

Bock v. Hamilton County Board of Park Commissioners

132 Ohio App. 3d 726 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1999

They have a daughter, born on August 27, 1979, who worked for the Hamilton County Board of Park Commissioners from the time she was sixteen years old until several months before her eighteenth birthday. … Findlay Publishing Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 134, 136 , 684 N.E.2d 1222, 1224 ; Peterson v. Teodosio (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 161 , 63 O.O.2d 262 , 297 N.E.2d 113 . 2 . Bowen v.

Management Recruiters of Marysville, Inc. v. Brown Group Recreational Products, Inc.

34 Ohio App. 3d 72 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1986

In Bretz v. Union Central Life Ins. … See Nicastro Associates, Inc. v. C. F. Wooding Co. (1985), 5 Conn. App. 244 , 497 A. 2d 1020 . Paragraphs one and two of the syllabus of Bauman v.

Howard v. Coventry Township Board of Zoning Appeals

110 Ohio App. 3d 691 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 1, 1996

Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34 , 12 OBR 26, 30, 465 N.E.2d 848, 852 . … Duncan v. Middlefield (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 83, 86 , 23 OBR 212, 215, 491 N.E.2d 692, 695 .

Doe v. Dayton City School District Board of Education

137 Ohio App. 3d 166 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1999

Osborne v. Lyles (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 326 , 587 N.E.2d 825 . … In Groves v. Dayton Pub.

Columbia Township Board of Zoning Appeals v. Otis

104 Ohio App. 3d 756 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1995

This court’s standard of review is found in Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34 , 12 OBR 26, 30, 465 N.E.2d 848 , 852: “In an R.C. … See Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. Mentor Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1958), 168 Ohio St. 113 , 5 O.O.2d 372 , 151 N.E.2d 533 .

Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. v. Board of Health

159 Ohio App. 3d 806 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2005

Motors v. McAvoy (1980), 63 Ohio St.2d 232 , 17 O.O.3d 143 , 407 N.E.2d 527 ; and Boys Town v. Brown (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 1 , 23 O.O.3d 1 , 429 N.E.2d 1171 . … Celebrezze v. Natl. Lime & Stone Co. (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 377, 382 , 627 N.E.2d 538 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Dayton Malleable (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 151, 155 , 1 OBR 185, 438 N.E.2d 120 .

Trebmal Construction, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

29 Ohio App. 3d 312 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1986

A taxpayer’s failure to comply with R.C. 5715.13 and 5715.19 may deprive the revision board of power to act on the taxpayer’s complaint. Stanjim Co. v. … Nucorp, Inc. v.

Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. Davis

9 Ohio App. 105 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1918

In February, 1918, said appeal was dismissed, * and thereafter on March 4, 1918, the relator caused an alias peremptory writ of mandamus to be issued and served upon said board. … That the members of the board of county commissioners thereby contemptuously ignored and disobeyed the order of this court, and the said members of said board of county commissioners are therefore in contempt of this court

Board of Education v. Nolte Tillar Bros. Construction Co.

71 Ohio App. 469 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1943

Co. v Adams Mfg Co., 128 Fed. (2d) 411. The plaintiff had a right to arbitration. It waived such right by bringing the action. The defendant Construction Company had the right to arbitration. … Jur. 613, §570; Hiller et al. v Shaw, 45 Oh Ap 303, 305; Bank & Trust Co. v Trust Co., 56 Oh Ap 309, 315. The trial court ordered a new trial. In this order we find no error, prejudicial to the appellants.

Union Township Board of Trustees v. Old 74 Corp.

137 Ohio App. 3d 289 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2000

Maryland (1965), 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (requirement of submission of films to censorship board). … If a permit is denied, the party has a right to appeal to the board of zoning appeals.

Consolidated Electric Coop. v. Brown Twp., 2006-Cah-11-0084 (7-9-2007)

2007 Ohio 3507 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2007

This means we review the matter de novo, Doe v. … Brown Township also concedes the Revised Code enabling statutes do not confer any power on a Board of Township Trustees or Board of Zoning Appeals in respect to the location, erection, construction, re-construction, change

Hubbard v. Cleveland Metropolitan School District Board of Education

195 Ohio App. 3d 708 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2011

Dresher v. … The board relies on Coleman v. Cleveland School Dist. Bd. of Edn., Cuyahoga App.