Case law

Muldowney v. Portage Cty., Ohio Board of Cty. Commissioners

115 N.E.3d 676 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2018

[Cite as Muldowney v. Portage Cty., Ohio Board of Cty. Commissioners, 2018-Ohio-2579.] … Hood v.

State ex rel. Greiner v. Board of Purchase

17 Ohio Law. Abs. 244 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1934

We are further of the opinion that a Board of Purchase is clothed with wide discretion in dealing with the making of contracts, and, as stated by Judge Spear in the State ex v Board, 81 Oh St, 221, “that a Board of Purchase … Board may rescind its action relative to awarding a contract at any time before the contract was reduced to writing and signed.” See Capital Printing Co. v Huey, 140 N. C. 767 . Weitz v Independent Dist., 79 Iowa, 433 .

Marion OB/GYN, Inc. v. State Medical Board

137 Ohio App. 3d 522 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2000

The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that the General Assembly granted the medical board a broad measure of discretion. Arlen v. … In Farrand v. State Med.

Liberty Paper Board Co. v. Poe

15 Ohio Law. Abs. 521 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1932

Co. v Mulvanney, 188 Ill., 311 ; 48 NE, 168 . Illinois C. R. Co. v Hopkins, 200 Ill., 122 ; 65 NE, 656 . Drennan v Grady, 167 Mass., 415 ; 45 NE, 741 . Samuelson v Cleveland Iron Min. Co., 49 Mich., 164 ; 43 Am. … Powers v Harlow, 53 Mich., 507 ; 5. 1 Am. Rep., 154 ; 19 NW, 257 . Bennett v Louisville & N. R. Co., 102 U. S., 477 ; 26 L. Ed., 235 . Evansville & T. H. R Co. v Griffin, 100 Ind., 221 ; 50 Am. Rep., 783 .

Ohio Bus Sales, Inc. v. Toledo Board of Education

82 Ohio App. 3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1992

Pursuant to R.C. 3313.46(G), a board of education must, in accepting a bid, determine the bid to be responsible and to be the lowest responsible bid. Hudson v. Wheelersburg Rural School Dist. … A board has the discretion to evaluate the responsibility of the bidders. Id. See, also, State ex rel. R & R Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. S. Point Bd. of Edn. (Sept. 23, 1983), Lawrence App.

Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2000

Bates Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth (1978), 56 Ohio App.2d 223 , and Columbus v. Hodge (1987), 37 Ohio App.3d 68 . … In Stewart v. Stewart (1998), Montgomery App.

Lamb v. Washington Township Board of Zoning Appeals

172 Ohio App. 3d 751 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 2007

Lamb and Mara V. Lamb, filed April 23, 2007. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp.

State Employment Relations Board. v. State

96 Ohio App. 3d 535 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1994

The findings of the board as to the facts, if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, are conclusive.” In Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. … Courts must afford due deference to the State Employment Relations Board’s interpretation of R.C. Chapter 4117.” More recently in Univ. Hosp., Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine v. State Emp.

Paramount Auto, Inc. v. Motor Vehicle Dealers Board

118 Ohio App. 3d 511 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1997

Worthington v. Worthington (1986), 21 Ohio St.3d 73 , 21 OBR 371, 488 N.E.2d 150 ; Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc. (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 83, 87 , 19 OBR 123, 126-127, 482 N.E.2d 1248, 1251-1252 . … Cunningham v. Indus. Comm. (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 73, 77 , 30 OBR 176, 180, 506 N.E.2d 1179, 1182 .

Board of County Commissioners v. Seminole Avenue Realty

179 Ohio App. 3d 37 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 2008

Evans v. … Wray v.

Corwin v. Board of Liquor Control

80 Ohio Law. Abs. 338 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1959

It is further the appellee’s contention that the case of Codic v. Board of Liquor Control, 98 Oh Ap 388, is decisive under the facts here, and requires an affirmance of the decision of the Common Pleas Court. … Board of Liquor Control, 98 Oh Ap 388, the decision in the case of Brewer v. Board of Liquor Control, 66 Abs 191 , would be followed.”

Wooten v. Neave Township Board of Zoning Appeals

150 Ohio App. 3d 56 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2002

Smith v. Granville Twp. Board of Trustees (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 608, 612 , 693 N.E.2d 219 . … Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. Hous.

Bolce v. Board of Education of the School Dist

22 Ohio Law. Abs. 363 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1934

It will be noted that the board in its resolution declared said painting to be an emergency and not an “urgent necessity,” as set forth in the statute. … Although the board of education has a wide discretion in determining whether or not an emergency or “urgent necessity” exists, and the court will not ordinarily question the action of the board on that ground, there was sufficient

Popson v. Danbury Local Schools Board of Education

152 Ohio App. 3d 304 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2003

Swafford v. Norwood Bd. of Edn. (1984), 14 Ohio App.3d 346, 348 , 14 OBR 414, 471 N.E.2d 509 ; LaPlant Enterprises v. Toledo (June 30, 1988), Lucas App. No. L-87-369, 1988 WL 69147 . … This procedure is equally applicable to action by a board of education, whether the action is taken by the board as a whole or by its designee. See Kipp v. Lorain Bd. of Edn. (Nov. 22, 2000), Lorain App.

Curry v. Board of County Commissioners

28 Ohio Law. Abs. 533 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1938

However, Note 6 of Section 8, makes reference to the case of Smith v Nicholas Building Company, 93 Oh St 101. … Also see Hossler, Executor v Trump, 62 Oh St, 139.

Khemsara v. Ohio Veterinary Med. Licensing Bd.

212 N.E.3d 1 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2023

Price were not subpoenaed to testify at the hearing, (5) Riker-Brown was a Board member, not an “independent ‘expert’ witness,” and (6) Riker-Brown did not provide an expert report. … v.

State Employment Relations Board v. Union Township Trustees

142 Ohio App. 3d 199 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2001

of appellee, the State Employment Relations Board (“SERB”), that Union Township engaged in unfair labor practices (“ULPs”). … In Eastex, Inc. v. Natl.

Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (2-20-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1998

Brown opened a Uniform Gift to Minors Account (UGMA) in his name as trustee for his daughter Ann B. Brown. … Brown is hereby approved and this matter is terminated. From this order, Ann Brown appeals.

State ex rel. Davis v. Board of Commissioners

9 Ohio App. 299 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1918

In Wagner v. Armstrong et al., 93 Ohio St., 443 , it was held that the jurisdiction of courts of appeals in the trial of cases on appeal is expressly limited by the constitution to chancery cases.

Concerned Businessmen v. Ottawa County Board of Commissioners

115 Ohio App. 3d 437 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1996

Williams v. Ottawa Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 247 , 3 O.O.3d 375 , 361 N.E.2d 1055 . … In Gallman v. Mercer Cty. Bd. of Cty.