Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Board of Education of City School District v. Dille

    109 Ohio App. 344 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1959

    Plaintiff, the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Oakwood, appellant herein, appeals on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas denying plaintiff the right to collect tuition … But a person may have more than one residence at the same time. 18 Ohio Jurisprudence (2d), 164, Domicile, Section 6; Grant v. Jones, 39 Ohio St., 506 , 515; Hill v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Board of Education v. R.J. Stickle International

    76 Ohio App. 3d 432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1991

    The first case is United States Fid. & Guar. v. Bonitz Insulation Co. of Alabama (Ala.1982), 424 So.2d 569 (hereinafter ‘‘U.S.F. & G.”). The second case is Home Ins. Co. v. Landmark Ins. … Co. v. Landmark Ins. Co., supra, 205 Cal.App.3d 1388 , 253 Cal.Rptr. 277 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bolce v. Board of Education of the School Dist

    22 Ohio Law. Abs. 363 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1934

    It will be noted that the board in its resolution declared said painting to be an emergency and not an “urgent necessity,” as set forth in the statute. … Although the board of education has a wide discretion in determining whether or not an emergency or “urgent necessity” exists, and the court will not ordinarily question the action of the board on that ground, there was sufficient

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Corwin v. Board of Liquor Control

    80 Ohio Law. Abs. 338 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1959

    It is further the appellee’s contention that the case of Codic v. Board of Liquor Control, 98 Oh Ap 388, is decisive under the facts here, and requires an affirmance of the decision of the Common Pleas Court. … Board of Liquor Control, 98 Oh Ap 388, the decision in the case of Brewer v. Board of Liquor Control, 66 Abs 191 , would be followed.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (8-21-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2000

    Brown appeals a judgment of the Stark County Common Pleas Court, Family Court Division, granting a divorce to appellee Julia A. … Holcomb v Holcomb (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 128 . Abuse of discretion involves more than a difference in opinion; it implies that the court's attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. Blakemore v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Drillex, Inc. v. Lake County Board of Commissioners

    145 Ohio App. 3d 384 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2001

    of the board, and entered in the minutes of its proceedings by the county auditor or the clerk of the board.” … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 2000

    Hennessy v. Hennessy (Apr. 21, 2000), Lucas App. No. L-99-1170, unreported. Therefore, appellant's assignment of error is not well-taken and this court must affirm the decision of the trial court. See, State ex. rel. … Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 52 , 53 .

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2001)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2001

    Brown. Each has pursued a self-serving agenda which has accomplished nothing. … Duncan v. Chippewa Twp. Trustees (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 728 , 654 N.E.2d 1254 . 2 Duncan at 730, citing High v. High (1993), 89 Ohio App.3d 424 , 427 , 624 N.E.2d 801 , 802-803 . See also, Keresztesi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ramsdell v. Washington Local School Board

    52 Ohio App. 3d 4 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1988

    As was stated in United Steelworkers v. … This exception is enunciated in Vaca v. Sipes (1967), 386 U.S. 171 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • DeSarro v. East Liverpool Board of Zoning Appeals

    165 Ohio App. 3d 732 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2006

    Thomas v. Thomas (Sept. 17, 1999), 2d Dist. … Saunders v. Clark Cty.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boyle v. Ohio State Medical Board

    6 Ohio App. Unrep. 300 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1990

    The Medical Board Was Not Substantially Justified in Initiating the Controversy!.]" … As this court has previously stated in In the Matter of Razia Malik, M.D., v. State Medical Board (Oct. 2, 1989), Franklin App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoeflinger v. West Clermont Local Board of Education

    17 Ohio App. 3d 145 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1984

    Locher, v. Menning (1916), 95 Ohio St. 97 . … See, also, Perkins v. Bright (1923), 109 Ohio St. 14 ; State, ex rel. Clarke, v. Cook (1921), 103 Ohio St. 465 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State, Board of Education

    4 Ohio App. Unrep. 119 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1990

    See Harris v. Lewis (1980), 69 Ohio St.2d 577, 578 (a reviewing court is not to substitute its judgment for that of the board). … Calhoun v. Madison Board of Education (March 4, 1989) Richland App. No. CA-2623, unreported, at page 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Shumway v. State Teachers Retirement Board

    114 Ohio App. 3d 280 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1996

    Dresher v. … In Mitchell v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Kraft Construction Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners

    128 Ohio App. 3d 33 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 1998

    or special session of the board, and entered in the minutes of its proceedings by the county auditor or the clerk of the board.” … (Footnote omitted.) 1 Klein, Browne & Murtaugh, Baldwin’s Ohio Civil Practice (1988) 33, T 13.03.”

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Milhoan v. Eastern Local School District Board of Education

    157 Ohio App. 3d 716 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2004

    Bush v. Spurlock (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 77, 80 , 537 N.E.2d 641 ; Roll v. Edwards, 156 Ohio App.3d 227 , 2004-Ohio-767 , 805 N.E.2d 162, at ¶ 15 . … Kelley Co. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati City School District v. State Board of Education

    113 Ohio App. 3d 305 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1996

    The fact that a school board’s desegregation plan leaves some disparity in racial balance among various schools in the system does not alone make that plan unacceptable.” Wright v. … entered into in Bronson v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Marion OB/GYN, Inc. v. State Medical Board

    137 Ohio App. 3d 522 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2000

    The Ohio Supreme Court has recognized that the General Assembly granted the medical board a broad measure of discretion. Arlen v. … In Farrand v. State Med.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2000)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2000

    Bates Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth (1978), 56 Ohio App.2d 223 , and Columbus v. Hodge (1987), 37 Ohio App.3d 68 . … In Stewart v. Stewart (1998), Montgomery App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Liberty Paper Board Co. v. Poe

    15 Ohio Law. Abs. 521 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1932

    Co. v Mulvanney, 188 Ill., 311 ; 48 NE, 168 . Illinois C. R. Co. v Hopkins, 200 Ill., 122 ; 65 NE, 656 . Drennan v Grady, 167 Mass., 415 ; 45 NE, 741 . Samuelson v Cleveland Iron Min. Co., 49 Mich., 164 ; 43 Am. … Powers v Harlow, 53 Mich., 507 ; 5. 1 Am. Rep., 154 ; 19 NW, 257 . Bennett v Louisville & N. R. Co., 102 U. S., 477 ; 26 L. Ed., 235 . Evansville & T. H. R Co. v Griffin, 100 Ind., 221 ; 50 Am. Rep., 783 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.