Case law

Snyder v. Stark County Board of Commissioners

29 Ohio App. 177 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1927

The Board of Commissioners of Stark County passed the necessary legislation to improve a highway, designated as the Canton-New Franklin Inter-county highway. … Proceedings had before the Board of County Commissioners and the proceedings on appeal in the probate court are statutory. No pleadings are authorized to be filed in the probate court by any of the interested parties.

Kendall v. State Counselor & Social Worker Board

81 Ohio App. 3d 638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

(“board”). … The common pleas court held that the board improperly failed to apply the “grandfather clause” of R.C. 4757.09 to appellee and, as a result, the decision of the board was against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Board of Education v. Unknown Heirs of Aughinbaugh

99 Ohio App. 463 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1955

Board of Education of Van Wert v. Inhabitants, supra. While Babin v. … The court refused to permit a deviation in the case of Board of Education of Incorporated Village of Van Wert v.

Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. Friendly Drugs

27 Ohio App. 3d 32 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1985

In Smith v. … Bd. of Trustees, v. Makowski (1984), 12 Ohio St. 3d 94 .

Dorf v. Sylvania Township Board of Trustees

2 Ohio App. 3d 196 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1981

The Common Pleas Court Erred In Finding That The Board’s Decision Was In Retaliation For Mr. Dorf s Exercise Of A Constitutionally Protected Right. “V. … “Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2709 (1972). See, also, Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S. Ct. 2694, 2699 (1972). “In Bishop v.

Excalibur Exploration, Inc. v. Board of Trustees

48 Ohio App. 3d 179 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1989

Named as defendants were the Board of Trustees of Springfield Township and Nora Rice, the zoning inspector. … R.C. 519.211 addresses limitations on township zoning power pursuant to R.C. 519.02 to 519.25 and states in part: “Such sections do not confer any power on any township zoning commission, board of township trustees, or board

Cicerella, Inc. v. Jerusalem Township Board of Zoning

59 Ohio App. 2d 31 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1978

Brown, J. This appeal by appellant, Tony Oicerella, is from a final judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Lucas County, affirming under R. C. … Thus, the Board did not follow the requirements of Section 7.5-5 in determining the extent of damage to appellant’s building. Jetter v. Hofheins (1947) 70 N. Y. S. 2d 808, 812; Navin v. Early (1945), 56 N. Y. S. 2d 346.

State Ex Rel. Snyder v. State Controlling Board

11 Ohio App. 3d 270 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1983

Moskowitz, v. Dickerson (1961), 172 Ohio St. 551 [ 18 O.O.2d 91 ]; State, ex rel. Harris, v. Silbert (1959), 169 Ohio St. 261 [ 8 O.O.2d 278 ]; State, ex rel. General Contractors Assn., v. … Masterson, supra, and Andrews v.

State Employment Relations Board v. Pierce Township

155 Ohio App. 3d 68 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2003

Instead, they were issued brown pants and orange shirts, the. same uniform worn by the township’s road crew employees. … Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 257, 261 , 533 N.E.2d 264 .

Toledo City v. Board of Tax Appeals

83 Ohio Law. Abs. 98 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1959

This is an appeal from the final order of the Board of Tax Appeals. … In the supplementary brief filed on behalf of the city of Oregon, reliance is placed on the case of City of Troy v.

Schwartz v. Carlisle Township Board of Education

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 92 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1923

The Board levied a tax on the taxable property of the district for the payment of the bonds. … Pounds, for Schwartz et al; Webber & Symons and Fauver & Cheney, for Board of Education; all of Elyria. • 1.

Wheeler v. Mariemont District Board of Education

12 Ohio App. 3d 102 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1983

The overriding principle remains as stated in Simon v. … The Supreme Court cited Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v.

Broadway Enterprise, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control

1 Ohio App. 2d 470 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1964

Zugravu, v. O’Brien, 130 Ohio St. 23 , 196 N. E. 664 . … Argonne Post No. 545, *478 American Legion, v. Board of Liquor Control (1953), 131 N.

Simon v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

108 Ohio App. 3d 297 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1996

Hartzog v. Ohio State Univ. (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 214 , 27 OBR 254, 500 N.E.2d 362 ; Angelkovski v. Buckeye Potato Chips Co. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 159 , 11 OBR 242, 463 N.E.2d 1280 . Cf. Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. … Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34 , 12 OBR 26, 29, 465 N.E.2d 848, 852 . Our review is plenary on the question of whether the board’s order was in accordance with law. See Univ.

Johnson v. Ohio State Board of Cosmetology

104 Ohio App. 3d 662 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1995

But, cf., Brown v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. … Richards v. State (1924), 110 Ohio St. 311 , 143 N.E. 714 .

Brown-Spurgeon v. Paul Davis Systems of Tri-State Area, Inc.

2013 Ohio 1845 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 6, 2013

[Cite as Brown-Spurgeon v. Paul Davis Systems of Tri-State Area, Inc., 2013-Ohio-1845.] … Touhey v.

State Ex Rel. Snyder v. Board of Elections

78 Ohio App. 194 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1946

This was pointed out in Dillon v. City of Cleveland, 117 Ohio St., 258 , 158 N. … City of Middletown, v. City Commission, 140 Ohio St., 368 , 44 N.

Caddell v. Columbiana County Board of Commissioners

112 Ohio App. 3d 10 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1996

Co. v. W. Crawford Dist. (1924), 266 U.S. 187, 190 , 45 S.Ct. 31, 32 , 69 L.Ed. 237, 243 ; Houck v. Little River Drainage Dist. (1915), 239 U.S. 254, 265 , 36 S.Ct. 58, 61-62 , 60 L.Ed. 266, 274-275 . … Appellants cite Coblentz v.

Guttentag v. Etna Township Board of Zoning Appeals

177 Ohio App. 3d 53 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2008

Id., citing Roper v. Richfield Twp. … . {¶ 42} Guttentag cites Schomaeker v. First Natl.

Ottawa County Board of Commissioners v. Seckler

122 Ohio App. 3d 617 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1997

Caddell v. Columbiana Cty. … The board of county commissioners may exercise this right of eminent domain when, in the board’s opinion, it is necessary. Id.