Case law

Haines v. Board of County Commissioners

114 Ohio App. 59 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1960

Van Harlingen, v. Board of Education, 104 Ohio St. 360 ; State, ex rel. Clarke, v. Board of Education , 11 Ohio. … In Krieg v.

Brown v. Dover Corp., C-060123 (5-4-2007)

2007 Ohio 2128 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2007

No. 83665, 2004-Ohio-6621 , quoting Kocsis v. Multi-Care gt., Inc. (C.A.6, 1996), 97 F.3d 876 , 885 . 19 See Hollins v. Atlantic Co. (C.A.6, 1999), 188 F.3d 652 , 662 ; Kocsis , supra; Bowman v. … No. 02AP-506, 2002-Ohio-6963 . 23 See, e.g., Howard v. Board of Education (C.A.6, 2003), 70 Fed.Appx. 272 . 24 See Delaney v. Skyline Lodge, Inc. (1994), 95 Ohio App.3d 264 , 270 , 642 N.E.2d 395 ; see, also, Long v.

Board of Edn. of Wilmington v. Graham

15 Ohio App. 2d 196 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 13, 1968

of courts as the money value of the land as determined by the board. … An issue similar to that in the case at bar was before the court in Euclid v.

Hale v. Ohio State Veterinary Medical Board

47 Ohio App. 3d 167 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1988

The board appeals, urging error in the trial court’s modification when it found that the decision of the board was supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence. In Arlen v. … Department of Liquor Control v. Santucci (1969), 17 Ohio St. 2d 69 ; Doelker v. Accountancy Bd. (196[7]), 12 Ohio St. 2d 76 . A disciplinary action of the State Medical Board is under the restrictions of R.C.

Lewis v. Board of County Commrs.

98 Ohio App. 192 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1954

Westwater, Admr., v. Guitner, 18 N. P. (N. S.), 209, 30 O. D., 370. Knowledge on the part of one sought to be estopped of his rights is an important element of equitable estoppel. Ensel v. Levy, 46 Ohio St., 255 , 19 N. … E., 597 ; Pennsylvania Co. v. Platt, 47 Ohio St., 366 , 25 N. E., 1028 .

Schreiner v. Russell Township Board of Trustees

60 Ohio App. 3d 152 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1990

Subsequently, ap-pellee appealed this denial before the Russell Township Zoning Board of Appeals. The board similarly denied the request for a variance on July 24,1987. … Curtiss v.

Holmes County Board of Commissioners v. McDowell

169 Ohio App. 3d 120 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2006

State v. … Williams v.

State v. Brown, 2006-T-0077 (9-7-2007)

2007 Ohio 4626 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2007

State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d 90 , 2006-Ohio-1792 , at ¶ 2 (" Brown I"). March 9, 2004, Mrs. Brown pleaded not guilty. Id. at ¶ 3. … State v. Mills (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 357 , 366 ; State v.

Ware v. Fairfax Zoning Board of Appeals

164 Ohio App. 3d 772 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2005

. {¶ 1} In a single assignment of error, appellants contend that the common pleas court erred by affirming the decision of the village of Fairfax’s zoning board of appeals (“ZBA”) that denied appellants’ application to operate … Blakemore v.

State, Ex Rel. Assn. v. Board

54 Ohio App. 2d 235 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1978

Appellant cites, in support of its waiver theory, State, ex rel Ford, v. Board (1943), 141 Ohio St. 124 , and State, ex rel. Brubaker, v. Hardy (1966), 5 Ohio St.2d 103 . … Majoewsky v. Indian Hill Exempted Village School District Bd. of Edn., unreported, First Appellate District, No. C-74527, decided September 8, 1975. 3 A measure of ambiguity exists as to the actual date of the order.

Neale v. Board of Liquor Control

106 Ohio App. 333 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1958

This cause comes on to be heard on a motion to dismiss which was filed by the appellee herein and which is as follows: *334 “Now comes the appellee, Board of Liquor Control, and moves this court for an order dismissing the … However, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio in Mosey v. Hiestand, Trustee, 138 Ohio St., 249 , 34 N. E. (2d), 210, we feel that the request to amend the notice of appeal should be granted.

DeWeese v. Ohio Board of Review

49 Ohio App. 2d 176 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1975

The Board of Review upheld that determination. Upon the affirmation by the Court of Common Pleas of the Board of Review’s decision, appellants lodged an appeal with this court. … As suggésted by Justice Zimmerman in Leach v.

Patterson v. Board of County Commrs.

22 Ohio App. 180 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1926

In the recently reported case of Jones v. Village of Maumee, 20 Ohio App., 455 , 152 N. … Co. v. City of Greenville, 69 Ohio St., 487 , 69 N. E., 976 . In that case the city sought to appropriate property for the purpose of extending streets across the tracks and yards of the railroad company.

Strandwitz v. Ohio Board of Dietetics

83 Ohio App. 3d 183 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1992

In Mathews v. … . * * *” See, also, Columbus v. New (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 221 , 1 OBR 244, 438 N.E.2d 1155 ; and State v. Collier (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 267 , 581 N.E.2d 552 .

Perkins Local School District Board of Education v. Wooster City School District Board of Education

183 Ohio App. 3d 638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2009

State v. … Keen v.

Stegall v. Ohio State Medical Board

92 Ohio App. 3d 389 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1993

Asad v. Ohio State Med. Bd. (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 143 , 606 N.E.2d 1064 . … The Supreme Court has specifically recognized and respected the expertise of the medical board in medical matters. Arlen v. State (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 168 , *394 15 O.O.3d 190 , 399 N.E.2d 1251 .

Stack v. Ohio State Dental Board

78 Ohio App. 3d 583 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1992

See Rohde v. Farmer (1970), 23 Ohio St.2d 82 [ 52 O.O.2d 376 , 262 N.E.2d 685 ]. … Angelkovski v.

Armstead v. Lima City Board of Education

75 Ohio App. 3d 841 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1991

The scope of review for an appellate court on questions of law is set forth in Kisel v. … The Newsome court found, in light of the requirements set forth in Goss v.

Giovanetti v. Ohio State Dental Board

63 Ohio App. 3d 262 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1991

See State v. Giovanetti (1990), 51 Ohio St.3d 603 , 554 N.E.2d 1297 . The appellant argues that the dental board, therefore, is obviously inconsistent in their proceedings. … State v. Good (1960), 110 Ohio App. 415 , 83 Ohio Law Abs. 65 , 11 O.O.2d 459 , 165 N.E.2d 28 , paragraph one of the syllabus. The annotation to the case of Henderson v.

Hickey v. Ohio State Medical Board

62 Ohio App. 3d 182 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1989

Dept. of Liquor Control v. Santucci (1969), 17 Ohio St.2d 69 , 46 O.O.2d 402 , 246 N.E.2d 549 . … This court in Hyde v.