Case law

Gorman v. Board of Liquor Control

69 Ohio Law. Abs. 510 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1953

First, that the order of the Board of Liquor Control is against the manifest weight of the evidence. … It should be noted, that the case which is thus presented is not the case which was before the Board nor that is before us on this appeal.

Ditmer v. Board of County Commissioners

34 Ohio Law. Abs. 340 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 20, 1941

Realty Board Investors, Inc. v. Oliver

31 Ohio App. 105 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1929

Mandalla v. Board of Liquor Control

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 345 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1951

From this order Mandalla prosecuted his appeal to the Board of Liquor Control. … Sec. 6064-3 Par. 3, GC, defines the appellate jurisdiction of the Board. It provides: “The board of liquor control shall have the power except as otherwise provided in this section: 3.

State v. Brown, Ca2006-10-247 (12-28-2007)

2007 Ohio 7070 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2007

State v. Wolery (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 316 , 329 ; State v. Weckner , Brown App. No. CA2001-06-009, 2002-Ohio-1012 , 2002 WL 371948 , at *2. … State v. Brown (1988) 38 Ohio St.3d 305 . Accordingly, appellant's third assignment of error is overruled. {¶ 49} Judgment affirmed.

Stillings v. Franklin Township Board of Trustees

97 Ohio App. 3d 504 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1994

Union 20 v. Toledo (1988), 48 Ohio App.3d 11, 13 , 548 N.E.2d 257, 259-260 , citing United Steelworkers of Am. v. … The board timely appealed from that order. Stillings v. Franklin Twp. Bd. of Trustees, Summit App. No. 16033. Stillings moved to dismiss that appeal for lack of a final, appealable order.

Zarachowicz v. Board of Liquor Control

117 Ohio App. 173 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1963

Frank Zarachowicz, appellee herein and hereinafter called permit holder, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on behalf of the Board of Liquor Control, appellant herein, upon the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction … However, the court below in effect interpreted Division B of Regulation 61 as being-invalid and an abuse of discretion, and it is from that interpretation that the board has appealed in this case.

Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. Poppe

48 Ohio App. 3d 222 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 1988

In Payne v. … In Gibraltar Mausoleum Corp. v.

LaPenna v. Board of Liquor Control

90 Ohio Law. Abs. 474 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1959

There are only two questions pending at this time before this court in this case and both of them arose under motions filed on behalf of the Board of Liquor Control of the State of Ohio. … In one of them counsel for the Board *475 seeks an order of this court consolidating this case with ten others for the purpose of filing brief and also for oral arguments while in the other motion an extension of time to

Payne v. Deercreek Board of Education

49 Ohio Law. Abs. 350 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1947

Pursuant to this resolution the president of the defendant board contacted the plaintiff and discussed the possibility of acquiring the said lots. … We are. referred to the case of Railroad Company v Belle Center, 48 Oh St 278, which is not in point here. There, more land was sought than necessary and the excess served no public purpose.

Garner v. Board of Liquor Control

67 Ohio Law. Abs. 308 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1951

This is a law appeal from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court reversing an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking the D-5 permit of Delia Garner for the reason of alleged false statements made in her application … to support the ruling of the Board.

Cattaruza v. Board of Liquor Control

79 Ohio Law. Abs. 431 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1958

No other reference to the number of feet is contained in the order of the Board of Liquor Control dismissing Elio Cattaruza’s appeal. … We feel that this burden has not been met and that the judgment of the Common Pleas Court in affirming the order of the Board is supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.

Schott v. Board of Liquor Control

80 Ohio Law. Abs. 135 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1958

Mandalla v. … The appellants rely heavily upon the case of Mocilnikar v.

Berry v. Board of Liquor Control

81 Ohio Law. Abs. 127 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1957

On an appeal to the Board of Liquor Control, the conviction was affirmed and on appeal to the Court of Common Pleas, the action of the Board was affirmed. … However, it will be observed that no objection was noted to the ruling of the Board. This is essential to the assignment that the Board erred in refusing to admit the testimony.

Board of Liquor Control v. Abernathy

61 Ohio Law. Abs. 567 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1951

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court affirming an order of the Board of Liquor Control rejecting the renewal of appellant’s C-2 permit. … Without comment or further observation we are satisfied that the Board of Liquor Control did not abuse its discretion in refusing to renew appellant’s permit, upon the evidence before it at his hearing.

Mazey v. Board of County Commissioners

39 Ohio Law. Abs. 354 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1942

Wolfel v. Board of County Commissioners

27 Ohio Law. Abs. 87 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1938

Wolfel her next friend was plain'iff and the appellee the Board of County Commissioners of Union county, Ohio, was defendant. There are six assignments of error in the case, as follows: 1. … Knisely v Community Traction Company, 125 Oh St 131. GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, concur.

Woodrey v. County Board of Education

21 Ohio App. 471 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 3, 1926

The county board of education may transfer a part or all of a school district of the county school district to an adjoining district or districts of the county school district. … Moreover, Section 4692 provides: “The county board of education may transfer a part or all of a school district of the county school district,” etc.

Alessandro v. Board of Liquor Control

105 Ohio App. 521 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1957

On November 6, 1957, the Board of Liquor Control, appellee-appellant herein, hereinafter referred to as the Board, filed a motion for reconsideration of the judgment of this court entered herein on October 17, 1957, for the … The Board set forth its assignment of errors in the instant case as follows: “1.

Evans v. Board of Liquor Control

112 Ohio App. 264 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1960

Appellee mentions this error but also contends this case is within the terms of a footnote in the case of Henry's Cafe, Inc., v. Board of Liquor Control, 170 Oh St 233. … Buffalo Grill & Hotel, v. Board of Liquor Control, 164 Oh St 275.