Case law

Fernberg v. Board of Liquor Control

71 Ohio Law. Abs. 166 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1954

Although the Supreme Court of Ohio, under date of February 10, 1954, in case Miller v. … Argonne Post No. 545, American Legion, Department of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio, v. Board of Liquor Control, decided *169 November 30, 1953, in an opinion written by the author of the opinion in the present case.

Hermelin v. Board of Liquor Control

76 Ohio Law. Abs. 33 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1953

In Meyer v. Dunifon, 88 Oh Ap 246, this Court used language which has application to the particular issues presented here. … On page 247, the Court said: “The Common Pleas Court, under §154-73 GC, was empowered to review the action of the board but not to substitute its judgment for that of the board. Farrand v.

Smith v. Board of Liquor Control

80 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1959

The Attorney General in support of his motion cites the case of Tipton, Admx. v. Day, 106 Oh Ap 103, decided by this court January 28, 1958. … Piletich v. Kovachy et al, Judges, 166 Oh St 298, decided on April 24, 1957.

Knowlton & Breinig v. Board of Education

31 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 177 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1920

In Akron v. … In Carthage v.

Realty Board Investors, Inc. v. Oliver

31 Ohio App. 105 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1929

Laws v. Board of Liquor Control

106 Ohio App. 233 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1958

At the conclusion of the hearing, the said Board found appellant guilty on both charges and revoked both permits. … Industrial Commission of Ohio, 135 Oh St 77, which had been certified in conflict with Gusweiler v. Riverview Apartments, Inc., 54 Oh. Ap 132, decided three years prior to the Anderson case, supra.

McCafferty v. Cleveland Board of Education

133 Ohio App. 3d 692 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 1999

Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704 , 622 N.E.2d 1153 . An appellate court applies the same test as the trial court. Zaslov v. May Dept. Stores Co. (Oct. 1, 1998), Cuyahoga App. … Turner v. Turner (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 337 , 617 N.E.2d 1123 , citing Temple v. Wean United, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 317 , 4 O.O.3d 466 , 364 N.E.2d 267 , and Harless v.

Board of Township Trustees v. Ottawa

20 Ohio Law. Abs. 353 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1935

Trus *356 tees of Cincinnati Township v Ogden, 5 O. 23 ; Sommers v Board of Education, 113 Oh St 177, 184. … duty of the Board of Trustees upon the failure or refusal of the Board.

Wise v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board

106 Ohio App. 3d 562 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1995

The board now appeals. … See, also, Ohio Historical Soc. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 466, 470-471 , 613 N.E.2d 591 , 595-596; Haehn v. Ohio State Racing Comm. (1992), 83 Ohio App.3d 208, 211 , 614 N.E.2d 833, 835 ; Kiss v.

Mandalla v. Board of Liquor Control

60 Ohio Law. Abs. 345 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1951

From this order Mandalla prosecuted his appeal to the Board of Liquor Control. … Sec. 6064-3 Par. 3, GC, defines the appellate jurisdiction of the Board. It provides: “The board of liquor control shall have the power except as otherwise provided in this section: 3.

Southern Ohio Sav. Bk. & Tr. Co. v. Brown

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 643 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1928

It is admitted that none of the persons to whom the stock of the corporation was issued gave any consideration for it, and the question is whether the said William Brown made a gift inter vivos to the persons to whom the … Our conclusion is that there was not sufficient evidence to establish a gift inter vivos and that the stock was an asset of the estate of William Brown, deceased.

Witschey v. Medina County Board of Commissioners

169 Ohio App. 3d 214 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 2006

Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. … See Lorenzetti, 146 Ohio App.3d at 455 , 766 N.E.2d 1022 , quoting Lilis v.

Brown v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, Local No. 7

77 Ohio Law. Abs. 85 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1957

Kaufman v. Ohio Veterinary Medical Board

69 Ohio App. 3d 79 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1990

The appellant cites Wheat v. State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners (Nov. 30, 1988) Summit County App. … The case of Arlen v.

Roy v. Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals

145 Ohio App. 3d 432 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2001

The Board finds that the’ appeal should be denied for the following reasons: “1. … Further, this court has previously noted that an administrative agency, such as a board of zoning appeals, cannot determine whether an ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to a particular parcel. Mobil Oil Corp. v.

Ohio University Board of Trustees v. Smith

132 Ohio App. 3d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1999

Am. v. … Brown v. Summit Cty.

Morton v. State Teachers Retirement Board

70 Ohio App. 2d 114 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1980

On August 8, 1978, plaintiff applied for the purchase of service credit for his service at Sir George *115 Williams University; the application was denied by the State Teachers Retirement Board because of an amendment to

Lake County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. State Employment Relations Board

86 Ohio App. 3d 300 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1993

College v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1990), 70 Ohio App.3d 18 , 590 N.E.2d 370 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. Relations Bd. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 257 , 533 N.E.2d 264 .

Maggiore v. Board of Liquor Control

115 Ohio App. 131 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1961

Brown of Bexley, Ohio, as a citizen, taxpayer and *132 purchaser of beer and malt beverages, have appealed to this court on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County. … In that court, the appeal of Maggiore and Brown from the action of the Board of Liquor Control, appellee herein, in adopting regulation No. 69, establishing a minimum markup of 25 per cent on carry-out sales of beer and malt

Ilich v. Board of Liquor Control

88 Ohio Law. Abs. 488 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1959

Since that time, on May 13, 1959, the Supreme Court of Ohio announced its decision in the case of State v. … (The ninth paragraph of the syllabus of Miller v. State, 3 Ohio St., 475 , overruled.)”