Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,699 results
1.64s
2011 Ohio 531 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2011
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN QUALIFYING DR. STEINER AS AN ORTHOPEDICS AND RADIOLOGY EXPERT. {¶22} “V. … The child bruised after being given immunizations and after blood draws by medical personnel.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLeroy v. Allen Yurasek Merklin, Unpublished Decision (8-29-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2005
The second issue involves Appellees' participation in the preparation of a will, which was allegedly drafted for Decedent in November of 2001. {¶ 11} Attorneys in Ohio enjoy a qualified immunity from liability to a third … immunity set forth in Simon v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2022 Ohio 1707 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 23, 2022
CA2018-05-101, 2019-Ohio-1492 ¶ 9. {¶ 15} In this case, the record firmly establishes that the trial court considered all relevant statutory factors set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 prior to issuing its sentencing … The record further establishes the trial court sentenced White within the permissible statutory ranges for first-degree felony rape and second-degree felony pandering obscenity involving a minor.
Cited 0 timesPublished2013 Ohio 3080 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2013
Though H.B. 86, through the newly-enacted R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(a), established a preference for, and in certain conditions, a presumption of, community control sanctions for fifth-degree felonies, this presumption does not … See R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(a)(i) ("[I]f an offender is convicted of or pleads guilty to a felony of the * * * fifth degree that is not an offense of violence or that is a qualifying assault offense, the court shall sentence
Cited 9 timesPublished2023 Ohio 1869 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2023
The separation agreement clearly states that neither party had present values for any retirement funds, pension, or any other deferred compensation account. … In fact, Monaco himself claimed that the system was forcing the couple to divorce so that his family would qualify for government assistance.
Cited 2 timesPublished2025 Ohio 2387 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2025
Her body language, the way she spoke, all those things, certainly would qualify as an excited utterance. … . {¶36} I think that qualifies as an excited utterance.
Cited 0 timesPublished2011 Ohio 5268 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2011
Scholler (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 98, 462 N.E.2d 158, the Ohio Supreme Court held that attorneys have a qualified immunity from liability to third parties for acts or omissions concerning the representation of a client. … Solomon and Harwood clearly had opposing interests; therefore, they were not in privity to each other. {¶ 28} Thus, the fifth assignment of error is overruled.
Cited 12 timesPublishedBainbridge Twp. Zoning Inspector v. Chagrin Valley Learning Collective Co-Op
2025 Ohio 146 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 2025
civil-law immunity for 17 Case Nos. 2024-G-0021, 2024-G-0022 agritourism providers.” … However, the evidence does not support the trial court’s finding that the CVLC program qualified as such.
Cited 1 timesPublished2014 Ohio 3575 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2014
Benitez-Maranon argues that the trial court committed plain error because it failed to ensure that he was provided with a qualified interpreter. {¶5} To establish plain error,1 “[f]irst, there must be … We agree that, although the trial court clearly conveyed the content of its sentence to Mr.
Cited 12 timesPublished2015 Ohio 4638 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2015
established federal law on the federal constitutional right to life, liberty, travel, freedom of movement, and to engage/exercise his right to interstate travel and commerce protected under the Privileges, Immunities … Although not clearly stated as such, he was requesting that the court find the ALS invalid, since the court could not reinstate his license when an ALS was in effect. {¶17} The correct procedure for seeking the
Cited 1 timesPublishedAratari v. Leetonia Exempt Village Sch., Unpublished Decision (3-26-2007)
2007 Ohio 1567 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2007
"Under the first tier, R.C. 2744.02 (A) grants broad immunity to political subdivisions. If immunity is established under R.C. 2744.02 (A), such immunity is not absolute, however. … In Hubbard , the Court explained that a school board meets the first tier and qualifies for general immunity because subsection (F) of R.C. 2744.01 declares public school districts to be political subdivisions and R.C. 2744.01
Cited 10 timesUnpublished233 N.E.3d 1137 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2024
Id at ¶ 46. {¶ 31} In this case, the appellant, himself, established the issue of identity, admitting he sold drugs to the CI in his trial testimony. … Appellant acknowledges that, while the state adduced testimony and evidence of Canfield’s qualifications, the state failed to move to have her qualified as an expert witness.
Cited 7 timesPublishedEvans v. Summit Behavorial Healthcare
2016 Ohio 5857 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2016
Because the Court of Claims did not clearly state its reason(s) for protecting the nursing shift reports from discovery, even after an in camera review, the question of their production must be remanded for the trial court … Summit did not establish what its quality assurance committee did or what documents the committee required.
Cited 2 timesPublished8 Ohio App. 3d 302 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1982
One testified the father was more qualified as a parent as he was more mature. … Since the evidence in this case established that either parent would be a proper custodian, the reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Id.
Cited 26 timesPublishedSpitler v. K & C Service Station Maintenance Co.
90 Ohio App. 3d 49 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1993
Appellee contended that it was in full compliance with Ohio workers’ compensation laws and, pursuant to R.C. 4123.74, was immune from suits based on negligent, nonintentional torts. … To establish an intentional tort of an employer, proof beyond that required to prove negligence and beyond that to prove recklessness must be established.
Cited 4 timesPublished2019 Ohio 5322 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2019
MacIntosh argues, however, that Brehm has not established a prima facie case of age discrimination because he did not meet the third element, which requires him to be qualified for his position as Administrator of the New … No. 19AP-19 8 {¶ 21} Therefore, because Brehm demonstrated he was qualified for his position, we find Brehm established
Cited 6 timesPublishedPortage County Board of Commissioners v. City of Akron
156 Ohio App. 3d 657 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2004
Kent, this error was clearly prejudicial to appellant because it would directly affect the city of Kent’s standing to be a party to appellees’ unreasonable use claim. … Chapter 2744 does not provide immunity to political subdivisions for claims that are “constitutional in nature,” because statutory immunity is “not a proper defense” to claims that do not “sound in tort.”
Cited 14 timesPublished124 Ohio App. 3d 197 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1997
In its first opinion, the trial court found that plaintiff submitted enough evidence to establish a prima facie case of libel and that Seitz failed to establish the truth of the statements contained in the letter as an absolute … We reject plaintiffs argument that statements *206 concerning the merits of the malpractice action are clearly outside the scope of the qualified privilege.
Cited 21 timesPublished2018 Ohio 3090 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2018
Given the trial court’s appointment of two Supreme Court qualified foreign language interpreters, we find no merit to appellant’s contention that the trial court failed to appoint qualified interpreters. {¶ 56} … Our role is to determine “whether in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the [trier of fact] clearly lost its 21.
Cited 4 timesPublished2021 Ohio 4046 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2021
court must review the entire record, weigh the evidence and all reasonable inferences, consider the credibility of witnesses and determine whether, in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the trier of fact clearly … The trial court also noted that White did not establish the accuracy of her speedometer.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna