Case law

Foster v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

53 Ohio App. 2d 213 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1977

Gyurcik v. Brown (1964), 176 Ohio St. 288 ; State, ex rel. Santora, v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga Coun *217 ty (1962), 174 Ohio St. 11 ; State, ex rel. Patrick v. … Schwarts, v. Brown (1964), 176 Ohio St. 91 ; see also, State, ex rel. Bargahiser v. Board of Elections (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 129 ; State, ex rel. Winterfield v.

Mullins v. Board of Liquor Control

73 Ohio Law. Abs. 577 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1954

This question has been answered by this Court in the affirmative upon very similar facts on three different occasions, in the unreported cases of Kroger Co. v. Board of Liquor Control, No. 4921, Godic v. … Board of Liquor Control, No. 4897, and Hermelin v. Board of Liquor Control, No. 4893. (OA 73 Abs 397 .) These cases were decided on June 3, 1953, and after the effective date of §154-73 GC.

Codic v. Board of Liquor Control

98 Ohio App. 388 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1953

Higgins, v. City of Racine, 220 Wis., 107 , 264 N. W., 490 , the court supported an order of the Board of Liquor Control which refused to grant a license to an applicant solely on the ground of its location. … See, also, Harrison v. People, ex rel., 222 Ill., 150 , 78 N. E., 52 ; Kretzmann v. Dunne, 228 Ill., 31 , 81 N. E., 790 ; Jugenheimer v. State Journal Co., 81 Neb., 830 , 116 N. W., 964 ; Bernstein v.

Hoffman v. State Board of Education

145 Ohio App. 3d 392 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2001

Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp. … Further, in Sayers v. State Bd. of Edn. (Dec. 1, 1994), Cuyahoga App.

GAY v. Board of Liquor Control

106 Ohio App. 59 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1958

The right of appeal of the agency, which, in this case, includes the Board of Liquor Control, must relate to the constitutionality, construction or interpretation of statutes and rules and regulations of the agency.

Burger v. Board of Liquor Control

72 Ohio Law. Abs. 493 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1955

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court affirming an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking six permits of appellant. … Because of the state of the proof and the general finding of the Board the question principally urged is not determinative of the appeal.

Roling v. Board of County Commissioners

72 Ohio Law. Abs. 534 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1953

In Lamp Heater Co. v. … Consistent with this quoted language the Court in Widows and Orphans Fund v. Church, 16 O. C. C. (N. S.) 248, held: “the mere reference of a case determines no rights.

State Ex Rel. Butler Township Board of Trustees v. Montgomery County Board of County Commissioners

162 Ohio App. 3d 394 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2005

See Rieger v. Penn Cent. Corp. (May 21, 1985), Greene App. No. 85-CA-11, 1985 WL 7919 . … Corbett v. Ohio Bldg. Auth. (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 44, 49 , 619 N.E.2d 1145 ; Premier Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Schneiderman (Dec. 28, 2001), Montgomery App.

State v. Brown, 06ap-1177 (9-20-2007)

2007 Ohio 4858 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2007

*Page 4 State v. Robinson , Franklin App. No. 01AP-1005, 2002-Ohio-2090 , citing Doggett v. … Id.; see, also, State v.

Knoff v. Board of Liquor Control

61 Ohio Law. Abs. 563 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1951

That portion of the order of the Board of Liquor Control which is pertinent herein is as follows: “The Board finds from the evidence that on March 4, 1951, at 2:00 A. … The rule announced in the case of Sata v.

Carrel v. State ex rel. Brown

11 Ohio App. 281 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1919

Co. v. Zanesville, supra; Mills v. Newberry et al., 112 Ill., 123 ; Ingraham v. … See Brannon v. Board of Education, 99 Ohio St., 369, and State, ex rel. Clarke, v. Board of Education, ante, 146.

Copley Township Board of Trustees v. Lorenzetti

146 Ohio App. 3d 450 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2001

Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 608, 612 , 693 N.E.2d 219 . See, also, Henley v. Youngstown Bd. of Zoning Appeals (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 142, 147 , 735 N.E.2d 433 , quoting Kisil v. … In regard to decisions of a board of zoning appeals, this court has held that “[l]egal matters are determined by facts, not by belief or desires.” Libis v.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Rockside Reclamation, Inc.

48 Ohio App. 2d 157 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1975

director or board of health to perform an act. … C. 119.10 the board is confined to that record as certified to it by the director. However, the board may grant a request for the admission of additional evidence.

Stickley v. Board of Liquor Control

79 Ohio Law. Abs. 223 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1956

We have held this case for opinion until after the decision of the Supreme Court in Westerhaus Company, Inc., v. City of Cincinnati, 165 Oh St 327. … Andrews, Jr., et al., v. Board of Liquor Control, 164 Oh St 275. The judgment will be reversed and cause remanded. MILLER. PJ, HORNBECK, J, concur. WISEMAN, J, not participating.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Board of Education

65 Ohio App. 273 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1939

Board of Education, v. … Board of Education, v. Bateman, supra.

Stahl v. Ohio State Dental Board

44 Ohio App. 3d 26 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 27, 1988

Appellant has timely filed a notice of appeal asserting the following as his assignment of error: “The court of common pleas erred in its granting of the motion of ap-pellee Ohio State Dental Board to dismiss because jurisdiction

White v. Columbus Board of Education

2 Ohio App. 3d 178 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1982

Parsons, v. Ferguson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 389, 392 [ 75 O.O.2d 456 ]; State, ex rel. Gillie, v. … United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans (1977), 431 U.S. 553 . See Farris v. Bd. of Edn. of St. Louis (C.A. 8, 1978), 576 F.2d 765 ; Freude v. Bell Tel. Co. (E.D. Pa. 1977), 438 F. Supp. 1059 ; Rodgers v. Berger (D.

Longona v. Board of Liquor Control

79 Ohio Law. Abs. 385 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1958

In Kosick v. … Board of Liquor Control, 52 Abs 65 , Rio Bar, Inc. v. State, 69 Abs 206 , and Mozingo v.

Hayes v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners

94 Ohio App. 3d 597 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1994

Bd. v. Brasseur (July 2,1986), Licking App. No. 3171, unreported, 1986 WL 7735 . … It answered in the negative, stating: “It is clear that if a timely notice of appeal is not filed with the Board, even if a notice of appeal is timely filed with the court, the defect is jurisdictional. See Holley v.

Elyria Township Board of Trustees v. Kerstetter

91 Ohio App. 3d 599 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1993

On December 10, 1991, the appellee, Elyria Township Board of Trustees (“the township”), removed Kerstetter from his post as township fire chief. … The Ohio Supreme Court, in GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v.