Case law

Simeone v. Girard City Board of Education

171 Ohio App. 3d 633 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2007

Co. v. … San Antonio (Tex.App.2001), 40 S.W.3d 587 ; Acuna v. Brown & Root, Inc. (C.A.5, 2000), 200 F.3d 335 .

Passmore v. Greene County Board of Elections

74 Ohio App. 3d 707 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1991

The court attempted to distinguish Sladoje v. … The trial court found that Leppla had violated R.C. 2323.51 and Civ.R. 11 because there was no legal basis for moving to intervene after judgment, despite the trial court’s acknowledgment that Likover v.

Elmer v. Lucas County Children Services Board

36 Ohio App. 3d 241 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1987

This is an appeal from the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, whereby the court granted permanent custody of the minor child, Jennifer Elmer, to the Lucas County Children Services Board (hereinafter “LCCSB … See, also, Santosky v. Kramer (1982), 455 U.S. 745 .

Gladieux v. Ohio State Medical Board

133 Ohio App. 3d 465 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

“In an appeal from a medical board’s order, a reviewing trial court is bound to uphold the order if it is supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence, and is in accordance with law.” Pons v. … Shott v. Tehan (C.A.6, 1966), 365 F.2d 191, 198 ; see, also, Fleming v. United States Dept. of Agriculture (C.A.6, 1983), 713 F.2d 179, 184-185 .

Brown v. Rapid Trans. Sales Co.

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 557 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1928

McAdams v. McAdams, 80 OS., 240 . Upton, Assignee, v. Tribilcock, 91 U.S. 45, 50 . Jackson v. Croy, 12 Johns., 427 ; Lies v. Stub, 6 Watts, 48 ; Farley v. Bryant, 32 Me. 474 ; Coffing v. … Brown before the contract was completed.

Morris v. Lucas County Children Services Board

49 Ohio App. 3d 86 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 15, 1989

Appellee, Lucas County *87 Children Services Board (“board”) has moved for an immediate affirmation of the trial court’s decision or, in the alternative, a motion to dismiss the present appeal. … The procedure to be followed when appointed counsel cannot find any merit in his or her client’s appeal was set forth in Anders, supra, at 744 , as cited by Freels v.

Stelzer v. State Board of Education

72 Ohio App. 3d 529 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1991

The Board is not required to follow the recommendations of the referee. See Graziano v. Amherst Village Bd. of Edn. (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 289, 293 , 513 N.E.2d 282, 285 . … The Ohio Supreme Court in Hale v.

Miller v. Greene County Children's Services Board

162 Ohio App. 3d 416 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2005

. {¶ 1} The Greene County Children’s Services Board (“GCCS”) appeals from an order of the Greene County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, placing Stephan Miller in a planned permanent living arrangement (“PPLA”).

State v. Brown, Ca2006-10-120 (10-29-2007)

2007 Ohio 5787 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2007

State v. … Id. at *3, *4. {¶ 31} Here, the record indicates that appellant was present at trial as Shirley Brown *Page 11 and that the evidence presented at trial referred to appellant as Shirley Brown throughout its entirety.

Derrick v. Board of Liquor Control

98 Ohio App. 97 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1954

State v. Petro, supra, paragraph eight of the syllabus.. … The case of Barn Cafe & Restaurant, Inc., v. Board of Liquor Control, 63 Ohio Law Abs., 351 , 109 N. E. (2d), 332, is distinguishable from the case at bar on the facts. In *100 Wallace v.

Brown v. Reading Community School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

2025 Ohio 2757 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2025

[Cite as Brown v. Reading Community School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 2025-Ohio-2757.] … Staph v.

Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. v. Brown

14 Ohio Law. Abs. 558 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1933

The case of Southwestern Gas & Electric Company v Nichols et, 254 SW, at page 215, it being a Texas case, involved an action against a street railway company for injuries to an alighting passenger, in which it was alleged … Company v Wiuvar, 257 SW, 667 involves the right of recovery of a woman who received an injury in stepping from a train to the platform.

Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati Board of Education

192 Ohio App. 3d 566 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 2011

The semiannual payment was the result of a 1999 agreement under which the city was required to pay the board $5 million annually in lieu of various taxes that the board had the right to assess with respect to Paul Brown Stadium … See Doe v. Shaffer (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 388, 390 , 738 N.E.2d 1243 . . See Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co. (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 102, 105 , 671 N.E.2d 241 . . State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v.

State ex rel. Foster v. Brown Cty. Health Dept.

2017 Ohio 8430 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2017

Foster v. Brown Cty. Health Dept., 2017-Ohio-8430.] … Establishing expiration dates will also streamline the administrative process. {¶ 8} On January 12, 2005, the Brown County Board of Health ("Board of Health") held a board meeting, during which it

State ex rel. Brown v. Cooper

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 278 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1930

Brissel, et al., v. State, ex rel. McCammon, 87 OS. 154 . … Jones, etc., v.

Mogavero v. Board of Liquor Control

82 Ohio Law. Abs. 25 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 1959

Counsel for the appellee urge that under this section the Board has no right of appeal as the Common Pleas Court did not pass upon the construction or interpretation of any rule or regulation of the agency, citing Katz v. … Board of Liquor Control, 166 Oh St 229.

Sheppeard v. Brown, 2007 Ca 43 (1-11-2008)

2008 Ohio 203 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2008

Fisher v. … Miller v.

GAY v. Board of Liquor Control

106 Ohio App. 59 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1958

The right of appeal of the agency, which, in this case, includes the Board of Liquor Control, must relate to the constitutionality, construction or interpretation of statutes and rules and regulations of the agency.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Board of Education

65 Ohio App. 273 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1939

Board of Education, v. … Board of Education, v. Bateman, supra.

Burger v. Board of Liquor Control

72 Ohio Law. Abs. 493 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1955

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court affirming an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking six permits of appellant. … Because of the state of the proof and the general finding of the Board the question principally urged is not determinative of the appeal.