Case law

Waspe v. Ohio State Dental Board

27 Ohio App. 3d 13 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1985

Recker and his prejudice tainting the remaining members of the board which could in no way be ‘quantitatively measured.’ Amos Treat & Co. v. S.E.C., 306 F.2d 260 ([C.A.D.C.] 1962).” … They contend that the board is both prosecutor and judge. In Withrow v.

Williams v. Columbus Board of Education

82 Ohio App. 3d 18 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1992

See Norris v. Ohio Std. Oil Co. (1982), 70 Ohio St.2d 1 , 24 O.O.3d 1 , 433 N.E.2d 615 ; and Temple v. Wean United, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 317 , 4 O.O.3d 466 , 364 N.E.2d 267 . … See Toledo’s Great Eastern Shoppers City, Inc. v. Abde’s Black Angus Steak House No. III, Inc. (1986), 24 Ohio St.3d 198 , 24 OBR 426, 494 N.E.2d 1101 ; Morris v. Ohio Cas. Ins.

Billiard v. Board of Liquor Control

62 Ohio Law. Abs. 355 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1950

Department of Liquor Control v. Alessandro, 56 Abs 554 . However, the filing of a bill of exceptions is not essential to the perfecting of an appeal. … Hoffman Candy Co. v. Department of Liquor Control, 56 Abs 257. The. failure to comply with Rule AÜII of this court is sufficient ground for the sustaining of the motion. Doe v. Roe, 54 Oh Ap 145; Parrott v.

Korn v. Ohio State Medical Board

71 Ohio App. 3d 483 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1991

See Korn v. Ohio State Medical Bd. (1988), 61 Ohio App.3d 677 , 573 N.E.2d 1100 . Korn’s single assignment of error is that “[t]he trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees.” … The matter was remanded to the board for further proceedings only with respect to punishment upon the one charge as to which the common pleas court did not reverse, the factual finding of the board.

Estate of Truesdell v. Traci Brown Ins. Agency Inc.

2024 Ohio 5440 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2024

[Cite as Estate of Truesdell v. Traci Brown Ins. Agency Inc., 2024-Ohio-5440.] … In Dresher v.

Schnarrs v. Girard Board of Education

168 Ohio App. 3d 188 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2006

Andy Saxon, Robin Jamison, and Nick Cochran were coaches employed by appellee, Girard Board of Education. … Co. v.

Kosick v. Board of Liquor Control

74 Ohio Law. Abs. 237 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1955

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court affirming an order of the Board of Liquor Control revoking certain permits of appellant. … It is the claim of the appellee that upon the circumstantial evidence in the record the finding of the Board is supported.

Ray v. Board of Liquor Control

79 Ohio Law. Abs. 10 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1958

While the Board struck out a portion of the last answer which referred to what Willie had said, the portion of the answer not stricken reads as follows: “A. … State v. Miller, 85 Oh Ap 376 at 378. The instant case is also supported by State v. Gutilla, 94 Oh Ap 469, 116 N. E. 2d 208 , where the fact situation is similar.

Douglas v. Cincinnati Board of Education

80 Ohio App. 3d 173 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 20, 1992

To bar pursuit of Douglas’s tort claim will preclude any redress for other injuries the board may have caused. Rush v. … In Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v.

Boyd v. Ohio State Medical Board

144 Ohio App. 3d 384 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 2001

The board denied the request, premised on his Michigan conviction for bribery. … See Schade v. Carnegie Body Co. (1982), 70 Ohio St.2d 207, 210 , 24 O.O.3d 316, 317 , 436 N.E.2d 1001, 1003 , citing State v.

McCarthy v. Ohio State Medical Board

63 Ohio App. 3d 543 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1989

Appellant appeared at a board proceeding and, subsequently, a hearing officer recommended to the board that appellant’s license to practice medicine be revoked. … upon an application which shall be furnished by the board, and shall pay at such time a fee of one hundred dollars to the board.

Cleavinger v. Board of County Commissioners

72 Ohio App. 3d 187 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1991

The plaintiffs-appellants are landowners who have unsuccessfully petitioned the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners to annex their Springfield Township property to the city of Springdale, Ohio. … The appellees cite Dudukovich v. Lorain Metro. Hous. Auth. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 202 , 12 O.O.3d 198 , 389 N.E.2d 1113 , for the proposition that the additional common pleas filing is a jurisdictional requirement.

Langdon v. Board of Liquor Control

112 Ohio App. 232 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1959

personal knowledge; and if his knowledge of any material fact be wanting or defective, the parties have ample opportunity to show it by cross-examination, and by testimony aliunde.’’ ’ Bellefontaine & Indiana Railroad Co. v. … The admission of the evidence in the form in which it was presented, without requiring further detail, was a matter to be determined by the board in its discretion. We find no abuse of that discretion.

Berezoski v. Ohio State Medical Board

48 Ohio App. 3d 231 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1988

Although R.C. 119.09 authorizes the board to consider additional evidence, it does not confer a right to be heard at the board’s meeting to consider the report and recommendation. Relying on Fuentes v. … Berezoski cites Withrow v.

Gilmore v. Ohio State Dental Board

161 Ohio App. 3d 551 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2005

Pierce v. … R.T.G., Inc. v. Ohio, supra.

Schoell v. Board of Zoning Appeals

120 Ohio App. 245 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1964

Schoell 6211-13 Clark Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, Appellant, v. City of Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals, Appellee, and the case went to trial with that caption. The error in the caption was induced by the appellee. … The Board of Zoning Appeals could, under no circumstances, become a party to the action. *286 See DiCillo & Sons v. Board, 158 Ohio St., 302 , 109 N. E. (2d), 8; State, ex rel. Basista, v.

Livisay v. Ohio Board of Dietetics

73 Ohio App. 3d 288 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1991

The board appeals, setting forth the following assignment of error: “The court below erred in concluding that the guidelines adopted by the board of dietetics to describe what degrees the board would consider to be in a ‘ … Hence, the action of the *291 board constituted a rule because it was to have a general and uniform operation. See R.C. 119.01(C). See, also, Ohio Nurses Assn., Inc. v.

Helton v. Scioto County Board of Commissioners

123 Ohio App. 3d 158 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1997

David Helton et al. appeal a summary judgment in favor of the appellee, Scioto County Board of Commissioners. … The appellants, David Helton and his passengers, filed a complaint alleging that appellee, Scioto County Board of Commissioners, was negligent in maintaining the ditch into which the water should have drained.

Winery v. Board of Liquor Control

77 Ohio Law. Abs. 292 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1956

In State Board of Equalization v. Young’s Market Co., et al., 299 U. S., 39 , 81 L. … The Supreme Court again had the question of the authority of the State under consideration in United States v. Brown Forman Distillers Corporation, 324 U. S., 293 , 89 L.

Stuart v. Board of County Commissioners

30 Ohio App. 283 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1928

The plaintiff in error relies upon the casó of Guernsey County Commrs. v. Black, 25 C. C. (N. S.), 415, 24 C. D., 164, which was affirmed without opinion in 88 Ohio St., 587 , 105 N. … Board of County Commrs. of Cuyahoga County, ante, 249, 164 N.