Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Club v. Board of Liquor Control

    71 Ohio Law. Abs. 193 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1955

    Socotch, v. … In Scaravilli v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nordonia Hills City School District Board of Education v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    11 Ohio App. 3d 189 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1983

    Simon v. Lake Geauga Printing Co. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 41 [ 23 O.O.3d 57 ]. … Hepner v. Bd. of Review (App. 1978), 11 O.O. 3d 144.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Dardas v. Board of County Commissioners

    83 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1959

    Jur. (2nd), Section 192, Page 584, citing Powell v. Young, 148 Oh St 342; and 1 O. Jur. (2nd), Section 194, Page 587, citing Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Board of Review, 70 Oh Ap 370. In 1 O. … (Citing Farrand v. State Medical Board, 151 Oh St 222; Meyer v. Dunifon, 88 Oh Ap 246.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rankey v. Arlington Board of Education

    78 Ohio App. 3d 112 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1992

    Thereafter, Joanne brought suit, ultimately naming the following as defendants (included is their status on the date that the injury occurred): Arlington Board of Education; Cory-Rawson Board of Education; Hancock County … In accordance with Miller v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kemerer v. Antwerp Board of Education

    105 Ohio App. 3d 792 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1995

    The Ohio Supreme Court, in Piqua v. … In Armour & Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Bristow v. Brown

    2018 Ohio 1822 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 4, 2018

    Bristow v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-1822.] … L-18-1064 Relator v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sata v. Board of Liquor Control

    88 Ohio App. 88 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1950

    The Common Pleas Court found that there was substantial evidence before the Board tending to show a violation and, since it was only a reviewing court, it could not weigh the evidence, citing Farrand v. … State Medical Board, 151 Oh St 222.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Langdon v. Board of Liquor Control

    98 Ohio App. 535 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1954

    Clair v. United States (C. C. A., 8, 1927), 17 F. (2d), 886; Reyff v. United States (C. C. A., 9, 1924), 2 F. (2d), 39; People v. Amort, 60 Cal. App., 29 , 212 P., 50 . … Certain observations in the opinion in Board of *539 Commrs. of Excise v. Backus, decided many years ago, 1864, 29 How. Pr. (N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Liquor Control

    96 Ohio App. 396 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1954

    Sata v. Board of Liquor Control, 88 Ohio App., 88 , 94 N. E. (2d), 464. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the appellant or any of his agents had actual knowledge of such intended misconduct. … The appellee cites the case of Wittenberg v. Board of Liquor Control, 52 Ohio Law Abs., 65 , 80 N. B. (2d), 711, a case decided by this court, but which we think is distinguishable on, the facts from the case at bar.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Willard City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board

    65 Ohio App. 3d 259 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1989

    question of what standard of review is to be applied by the court of common pleas in reviewing an order of SERB on an unfair labor practice charge was recently addressed by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. … The decision of The State Employment Relations Board is ORDERED set aside. “Counsel for the School Board shall prepare and submit a Judgment Entry in accordance herewith.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eberhardt v. Board of County Commissioners

    2 Ohio App. 491 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1913

    “Where, in the opinion of the chief engineer of the board of county commissioners it is not necessary to renew the track stringers or cross-ties of the street railway tracks, the said tracks shall be adjusted as required … The right to construct or reconstruct any electric railway * * * at any time prior to the *495 completion of the road covering over the line of the same, is expressly reserved by the board of county commissioners, and the

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Napolet v. Board of Liquor Control

    67 Ohio Law. Abs. 108 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1953

    Farrand v. State Medical Board, 151 Oh St 222; Meyer v. Dunifon, Director, etc., 88 Oh Ap 246. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ohio Board of Pharmacy v. Evankovich

    194 Ohio App. 3d 686 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2011

    See Medcorp, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Services (2009), 121 Ohio St.3d 622; Zier v. … Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control

    52 Ohio Law. Abs. 434 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1948

    At the conclusion of the hearing before the Liquor Board one of its members made the observation that “This Board presented its views in no uncertain terms about a year ago that where anything that tended to indecency or … of the Board or other sufficient cause, and for the following causes,” five of which ■are enumerated.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berndsen v. Westerville Personnel Review Board

    14 Ohio App. 3d 329 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1984

    Notification of the board’s action was sent to the Westerville Personnel-Review Board, appellee, on August 10, 1982. … Appellants assert that the board of education did not file supporting documentation with the Westerville Personnel Review Board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Roper v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    115 Ohio App. 62 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1961

    See: Fleischmann v. Medina Supply Co., 111 Ohio App., 449 . … The case of Howard Abrams et al. v. Jerome Gearhart et al., Suffield Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, No. 257, Court of Appeals for Portage County (Seventh Appellate District), appears in conflict.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jim Brown Chevrolet, Inc. v. S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

    141 Ohio App. 3d 583 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2001

    Appellants, Jim Brown Chevrolet, Inc., d.b.a. Classic Chevrolet; Classic Oldsmobile, Inc., d.b.a. Classic Oldsmobile; and Jim Brown, Inc., d.b.a. … Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 704, 711 , 622 N.E.2d 1153, 1157 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Romeo v. Board of County Commissioners

    64 Ohio App. 2d 269 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 12, 1978

    Brown, J. … Boards of county commissioners have only such powers as *270 are conferred upon them by statute. State, ex rel. Shriver, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Employment Relations Board v. Perkins

    144 Ohio App. 3d 460 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2001

    R.C. 4117.12(B) provides, in pertinent part, “If the board has probable cause for believing that a violation has occurred, the board shall issue a complaint and shall conduct a hearing concerning the charge.” … Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB, 9 and its application of federal law to the National Labor Relations Board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Korn v. Ohio State Medical Board

    71 Ohio App. 3d 483 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1991

    See Korn v. Ohio State Medical Bd. (1988), 61 Ohio App.3d 677 , 573 N.E.2d 1100 . Korn’s single assignment of error is that “[t]he trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees.” … The matter was remanded to the board for further proceedings only with respect to punishment upon the one charge as to which the common pleas court did not reverse, the factual finding of the board.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.