Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • Sturdivant v. Toledo Board of Education

    157 Ohio App. 3d 401 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2004

    Chapter 2505, governs the procedure that must be followed in filing a notice of an appeal from *406 an administrative decision of a school board. See Kiel v. … See Durham v. Pike Cty.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ledford v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    171 Ohio App. 3d 24 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2007

    Brinkman v. … See Casto v. Commercial Point (Dec. 22, 1999), Pickaway App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Scaravilli v. Board of Liquor Control

    61 Ohio Law. Abs. 515 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1950

    This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas affirming the action of the Board of Liquor Control in affirming the action of the Director of the Department of Liquor Control in refusing to issue a D-5 liquor … The powers and duties set-out in §6064-3 GC do not vest the authority in the Board tc issue permits. It follows that this duty not having been specifically delegated to the Board is vested in the Director by §6064-7 GC.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grossglaus v. Board of Elections

    86 Ohio App. 14 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1949

    Fowler, v. Board of Elections, 45 Ohio App., 34, 40 , 186 N. … In the case of Koehler, Jr., v. Board of Elections, 125 Ohio St., 251, 257 , 181 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Township Trustees v. Horn

    2 Ohio App. 3d 170 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1981

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carmichael v. Board of Education

    32 Ohio App. 520 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1929

    Woodbury & Co. v. Berry, 18 Ohio St., 456 . … Woodbury & Co. v. Berry, 18 Ohio St., 456 ; Slingluff et al. v. Weaver et al., 66 Ohio St., 621 , [ 64 N. E., 574 ]; Hough v. The Dayton Mfg. Co. et al., 66 Ohio St., 427 [ 64 N. E., 521 ].” Village of Elmwood Place v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGwinn v. Board of Education

    78 Ohio App. 405 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1946

    Surplus Trading Co. v Cook, 281 U. S. 647, 650-652 ; James v. Dravo Con. Co. supra. See also, Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v Lowe, 114 U. S. 527 -539; Arlington Hotel Co. v. Pant, 278 U. S. 439, 451 ; United States v M. … In the case of Mason v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Southern Ohio Savings Bank & Trust Co.

    22 Ohio App. 324 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1926

    Brown, Alexander McD. Brown, Bessie M. Brown, and John C. Healy, as their property. It appears that none of these parties filed any exceptions to the inventory within six months from the filing thereof. … At the hearing, the court heard and passed upon exceptions to the account of the administrator of the estate of William Brown, deceased, with reference to the allowance of administrator’s and attorney’s fees.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chlysta v. Ohio State Dental Board

    174 Ohio App. 3d 465 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2007

    Pons v. Ohio State Med. … See Lomaz v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Eaton City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board

    71 Ohio App. 3d 783 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1991

    Clearly, therefore, the board was not required to bargain regarding the matter of teaching assignments, and it follows that the board was not guilty of an unfair labor practice in refusing to do so. … Stated differently, the board of education in Lorain attempted to abolish, and remove a specific classification, nurses, from the bargaining unit.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cloud v. Board of Elections

    15 Ohio App. 2d 222 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 6, 1968

    Kittel, v. … McCormick, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of County Commrs.

    28 Ohio App. 8 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1923

    In the recent case of Knowlton & Breinig v. Board of Education of Village of Johnstown, 13 Ohio App., 30 , 31 O. C. … In the case of Comstock v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Mastroianni v. Board of Liquor Control

    98 Ohio App. 500 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1954

    On appeal to the Court of Common Pleas the ruling of the board was sustained. … But the trial court held that it did not have authority to interfere with the ruling of the board. With that conclusion the members of this court do not agree.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Delmond v. Board of Investors Corp.

    48 Ohio Law. Abs. 293 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 7, 1947

    See Gwynne v Niswanger, 20 Oh St 556; Jones v Devore, 8 Oh St 430; State ex rel v Godfrey 62 Oh St 181; Kahle v Niseley, 74 Oh St 328; Cech v Schultz, 132 Oh St 353, 8 OO 113. … See also: Schick v Cincinnati, 116 Oh St 631; Smith v Barnell, 109 Oh St 246; Richter v Anderson, 56 Oh Ap 291, 385; State ex rel v Board of Education, 127 Oh St 336; 37 O. Jur. 336, Sec. 33; J. L, Ewing, Treas v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Amon v. Ohio State Medical Board

    67 Ohio App. 3d 287 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1990

    “V. The trial court erred in failing to observe appellant’s procedural due process rights under Ohio Revised Code Section 119.07.” The basic facts are not in dispute. … See State v. Williamson (1967), 10 Ohio St.2d 195, 196 , 39 O.O.2d 231, 232 , 226 N.E.2d 735, 736 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Littick

    42 Ohio App. 515 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1932

    The plaintiff urges that there be applied to this situation the doctrine laid down in Trumbull County Board of Education v State ex Van Wye, 122 Oh St, 247, 171 NE 241 . … District v County Board of Education, recently decided in Jefferson County.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Board of Review

    39 Ohio App. 3d 131 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1987

    Both parties cite Abrendts v. Ohio Valley Hospital Assn. (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 11 , 17 OBR 9, 476 N.E. 2d 1027 . *132 The appellants’ reliance on that case is misplaced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Quigg v. Board of Education

    69 Ohio App. 165 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1941

    such board in June 1940, and duly promulgated by it, requiring a physical examination at stated periods of some 365 non-teaching employees of the board, exclusive of food handlers and cafeteria employees. … True, "boards of education are created by statute, and their jurisdiction is conferred only by statutory provision,” and "they have such powers only as are clearly and expressly granted.” Verberg v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Board of Review

    19 Ohio App. 3d 95 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1984

    Columbia Gas Transmission Co. (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 211 [ 2 O.O.3d 393 ], paragraph one of the syllabus; Mastrangelo v. Connor (Nov. 23, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 46115, unreported; Giachetti v. … Holmes (1984), 14 Ohio App. 3d 306 ; Jurko v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phelps v. Board of Twp Trustees

    26 Ohio Law. Abs. 298 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1937

    A similar suit of the landowner next south from plaintiff’s premises was before this court (Saunders et v Jenkins et, 17 Abs 323 ), and in that case the use for many years of a part of the landowner’s property between the

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.