Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • Gilmore v. Board of County Commrs.

    17 Ohio App. 177 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1922

    In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Portage County v. … The commissioners simply acted as a board before whom the necessary proceedings for the construction of the ditch had, by the statute, to be conducted.’ ” In the case of Commissioners v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, 07ap-244 (12-4-2007)

    2007 Ohio 6542 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2007

    State v. Jenks (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 259 . … Id. at 387 , citing State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Pendleton

    80 Ohio App. 249 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1947

    Cited in support of that contention is Chaney v Coulter, 29 O. C. … Mears v Mears, 15 Oh St 90, and Hutson v Hartley, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stressenger v. Board of County Commissioners

    28 Ohio App. 2d 124 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1971

    Adamowski, v. Village of Streamwood (1959), 15 Ill. 2d 595 , 155 N. E. 2d 635 ; Potvin v. Village of Chubbuck (Idaho 1955), 284 P. 2d 414 ; and Clark v. Holt (Ark. 1951), 237 S. W. 2d 483 . … The case of Watson v. Doolittle (1967), 10 Ohio App. 2d 143 , asserts the principles which we and the trial judge *128 have enunciated here.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Town & Country Auto Sales, Inc.

    43 Ohio App. 2d 119 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1974

    Brown, the Attorney General of Ohio, filed a complaint against Town and Country Auto Sales, Inc. … Maher, v. Baker (1913), 88 Ohio St. 165 , 172; Adamski v. Bureau of Unemployment Comp. (1959), 108 Ohio App. 198 . An unambiguous statute is to be applied, not interpreted. Sears v. Weimer (1944), 143 Ohio St. 312 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bowers v. Ohio State Dental Board

    142 Ohio App. 3d 376 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2001

    Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451, 469 , 715 N.E.2d 1062, 1080 . … Newell v. Brown (1954), 162 Ohio St. 147 , 54 O.O. 392 , 122 N.E.2d 105 ; and State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 1 , 591 N.E.2d 1186 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Gibney v. Toledo Board of Education

    73 Ohio App. 3d 99 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 17, 1991

    See Kelley v. Metropolitan Cty. Bd. of Edn. (C.A.6, 1985), 773 F.2d 677, 682 ; Northcross v. Board of Edn. of Memphis City Schools (C.A.6, 1979), 611 F.2d 624 , 637. … Baughman v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co. (C.A.3, 1978), 583 F.2d 1208 , 1219; Brown v. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. (D.N.J.1983), 560 F.Supp. 391, 412 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mentor Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board

    76 Ohio App. 3d 465 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1991

    The Ohio Supreme Court in Avon Lake City School Dist. v. … In Lorain City Bd. of Edn. v. State Emp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Board of Liquor Control

    64 Ohio Law. Abs. 477 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1952

    The evidence offered on the appeal to the Board supported its findings in all material matters. … The reversal required the Common Pleas Court to substitute its judgment for that of the Liquor Board. This it cannot do. Farrand v. State Medical Board, 151 Oh St 222.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp. v. Brown

    14 Ohio App. 3d 376 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1984

    Brown, 1 respondent herein, is the trial judge against whom relators seek the writs of mandamus and prohibition. Respondent is the presiding judge in a criminal case currently pending in the court below, State v. … In Houchins v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ohio State Medical Board v. Pla

    42 Ohio App. 3d 239 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1988

    Ramon Pla, appellant, is appealing the judgment of the common pleas court which affirmed the decision of the Ohio State Medical Board revoking his license to practice medicine and surgery. … Prior to the filing of the appellate briefs in this matter, appellee, the medical board, moved to dismiss appellant’s appeal to this court as untimely.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Prejean v. Euclid Board of Education

    119 Ohio App. 3d 793 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1997

    Euclid Board of Education, the review of the diagnostic studies and tests which you conducted on behalf of Ms. … In Miller v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ohio Veterinary Medical Board v. Singh

    127 Ohio App. 3d 23 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1998

    court must give due deference to the administrative resolution of evidentiary conflicts and must not substitute its judgment for that of the administrative board or agency. 2 In Pons v. … Hildebrandt, P.J., and Marianna Brown Bettman, J., concur. 1 . See Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 619 , 614 N.E.2d 748 ; Slone v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lakewood v. State Employment Relations Board

    66 Ohio App. 3d 387 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1990

    Clark, v. … Pepper Pike v. Hirschauer (Feb. 1, 1990), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 56963, 56964, 56965, 57667, unreported. See, also, City of Columbus v. Tullos (1964), 1 Ohio App. 2d 107 ; Board of Commissioners v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Karrick v. Board of Education

    117 Ohio App. 175 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1961

    the board in various nonteaching capacities. … In the case of State, ex rel., Giovanello, v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kulik v. Board of Review

    14 Ohio App. 3d 302 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 21, 1984

    Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511, 518 [ 36 O.O. 167 ]. … Doersam *304 v. OBES (App. 1977), Unempl. Ins. Rep. (CCH), Ohio Rules and Decisions 1971 -1979, Paragraph 9102, at 38,947.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Scaravilli v. Board of Liquor Control

    61 Ohio Law. Abs. 515 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1950

    This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas affirming the action of the Board of Liquor Control in affirming the action of the Director of the Department of Liquor Control in refusing to issue a D-5 liquor … The powers and duties set-out in §6064-3 GC do not vest the authority in the Board tc issue permits. It follows that this duty not having been specifically delegated to the Board is vested in the Director by §6064-7 GC.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Children Services Board

    21 Ohio App. 3d 115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1984

    The petitioner, Sherri Parker, demanded that the Children Services Board of Trumbull County show by what order they are retaining custody of her child, Adam Parker. … The Children Services Board and the court were vigilant and took sensible action. For this they should be commended and not charged with chicanery.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Employment Relations Board v. Akron City School District Board of Education

    83 Ohio App. 3d 719 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1992

    The issue before this court arises out of a collective bargaining agreement between OAPSE and appellee, the Akron City School District Board of Education (“board”). … Under the collective bargaining agreement, the board recognized OAPSE as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent for certain employees of the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Township Trustees v. Horn

    2 Ohio App. 3d 170 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1981

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.