Case law

Brown v. State

2 Ohio C.C. 129 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1887

In Van Buskirk v. … Following Stanley v. State, 23 Ohio St., 581 ; and Farris v. State, 1 Ohio St., 188 . In Jennings v.

Brown v. Ginn

19 Ohio C.C. 660 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

In this case Brown averred in his answer that the claim ued upon by the trustee had been paid in money. … It is ■ laimed here that Brown under hits answer was entitled to show payment in any method, and the court erred in confining him to showing payment by money only.

Brown v. State

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 93 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 30, 1910

Brown v. Parham

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 602 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 16, 1903

When the case of Wentzel v. Hayes et al, 16 C. C., 110, was decided, Section 5441, Revised Statutes, as 'amended in 81 O.

Brown v. Harshman

9 Ohio C.C. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

Card’s Adm’r, 2 Ohio St. 450 ; Bigelow v. Bigelow, 4 Ohio, 138, and Martin’s Adm’r v. Train’s Ex’r, 6 O. C. C. R. 49. … See also Garber v. The Commonwealth, 7 Pa. St. 265; Harker v. Irick, 2 Stock. Chy. 269. Such a construction would be both unreasonable and unjust. Barcus v. Stover, supra.

Brown v. Ricketts

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 269 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 20, 1905

Brown, he rendered professional services to Frank Brown, a son of the defendant, and that the fair value of such services is $780. … V. & T. Ry. v. Gaffney, 65 Ohio St. 104 [61 N. E.

Reed v. Brown

10 Ohio C.C. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

Brown, as executor under the last will and testament of Robert Brown, deceased, late of Hartland, in the county of Huron and state of Ohio, which will was duly proved and admitted to probate by the probate court for said … Brown is one of the sureties on the bond of said executor.”

Brown v. Larkin

20 Ohio C.C. 663 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

Wilson v. Brown

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 719 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1898

I Relieve there is one witness who testifies as to the value of services for board, lodging and washing, in which she testifies that the same are worth four dollars ■ per week.

Caldwell v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 691 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1895

The action was first brought before a justice of the peace, Judgment was recovered by Brown, from which Caldwell appealed. … This section was under consideration by this court at the last term of this court, in the case of Foy v, The Toledo Consolidated Street Ry.

Brown v. John

18 Ohio C.C. 736 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1894

Brown being the wife of Jeremiah Brown) for the foreclosure of the mortgage above mentioned. … It may not be material ini the case of Baldwin v. Sheets, supra. Our conclusion is that the judgment should be affirmed.

Leverone v. Brown

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 722 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 8, 1909

We do not think the holding of this court in Swing v. Crane, 32 O. C. C. 000 (11 N. … In Swing v. Crane, supra, one of the defenses was the statute of limitations.

Van Arsdale v. Brown

18 Ohio C.C. 52 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1899

An authority to this fact is the case of Lewis v. Tipton, 10 Ohio St., 88 . … We have had occasion to discuss this question in the case of Ashley v. Walker, 15 C. C., 660.

Brown v. Wallace

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

Browne, has given bond in this court as such assignee, and is entitled to such appeal without giving bond.” It would be enough to rest our decision upon the case of Willis v. … The supreme court of Wisconsin, in Eaton v.

Schultz v. Brown

3 Ohio C.C. 609 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

Brown, conveyed the property to L. W. Brown for the nominal consideration of $3000, but really for $2000, and L. W. Brown did not then know of the contract between Hobby and George P. … Dickson v. Rawson, 5 Ohio St. 224 . Laudenback v. Foster, 39 Ohio St. 203 .

Bailey v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 455 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1895

The defendant Brown removed the rubbish; sofaras related to the wood work at least the walls were restored, and as they were restored, Brown furnished additional materials, and replaced the wood work up to the point that … This conclusion is sustained by a large number of authorities from which we cite: Butterfield v. Bryan, 153 Mass. 517 ; Clarke v. Busse, 82 Ill. 515 ; Carretty v. Brasil, 34 Iowa 100 ; Cook v. McCabe, 53 Wis. 250 .

Board of Education v. Board of Education

6 Ohio C.C. 597 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1892

Sec. 3972 referred to, simply vests the title to all property, personal and real, situated in a particular district, in the board of education of such district. … Without referring to the many cases cited, where these doctrines are clearly set forth, we deem it necessary only to cite the language of Judge Ranney, in deciding the case of Com’rs of Fulton Co. v.

Board of Education v. Board of Education

10 Ohio C.C. 617 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1895

, and that the expenses should be paid out of the school funds of the sending board. … That done, the" board must permit the pupils to attend; and the board of the district where the pupils reside must pay for it.

Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners

12 Ohio C.C. 563 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1896

The statute provides: — ■ Sec.3,“if said board of freeholders shall not be able to agree upon the amount to be paid by said upper county to said lower county, then they shall call to their assistance one other freeholder,

Findlay Brewing Co. v. Brown

19 Ohio C.C. 612 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

In the court of common pleas, Brown was plaintiff and the-Brewing Company defendant. … And we believe, too, that this is consistent with the case of Bogart v. Cox, 4 C.