Case law

State ex rel. Cahoo v. Board of Elections

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 215 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 31, 1898

I read from the case of State-ex rel. v. Archibald, Sheriff, 52 O. S., 1. … intended to abolish the existing board without providing some other board in its place?

State ex rel. Goff v. Board of Education

21 Ohio C.C. 383 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

State ex rel. Gaines v. State Medical Board

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 687 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 5, 1909

State v. Barberton (Bd. of Ed.), 76 Ohio St. 297 [81 N. E. Rep. 568; 10 Ann. Cas. 879]. … How then can we say that the board has abused the discretion vested in it and grant relief, when the rule of law justifying interference by the courts requires that such abuse be clearly shown? Sycamore (Bd. of Ed.) v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Pennsylvania Co.

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 409 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1903

Public highways belong to the state and are under its control and boards of county commissioners have only such jurisdiction over them as is provided by statute (Commissioners of Gallia County v. … Reports, Vol. 2, pt. 1, p. 87; People v. Vanderbilt, 26 N. Y., 287 ; People v. Davidson, 30 Cal., 379 ; Attorney-General v. Stewart, 21 N. J. Eq., 340; Attorney-General v. Forbes, 2 Mylne & C., 123).

State ex rel. Winifrede Coal Co. v. Board of Public Affairs

4 Ohio C.C. 76 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1889

The two lowest propositions to deliver to Front Street, were •Brown 2d Pool at $2.27 and Winifrede at $2.28 per ton ; 179 per cent, in favor of Brown over Winifrede, and deducting this ex *80 cess for that of its valuation … to it, 3.199 -179, 2.409 per cent, in favor of Brown.

State ex rel. Crawford v. Township Board of Education

19 Ohio C.C. 574 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

If the board at such meeting fails to confirm it, the board o£ sub-directors shall elect another teacher before the next regular meeting of the board of education. … If the board of sub-directors fails to do this, or the board of education fails to confirm an election by the local board before the third Monday of August of any year, the board of education shall then employ a teacher for

Hayes v. Board of Education of the City District

22 Ohio C.C. 32 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

This case is here on a petition in error to reverse a judgment obtained" by the board of education of the city of Cleveland against'W. J._ Hayes & Sons for certain interests on bonds. '''""On' Noveinber 9th, 1889, W. J. … Hayes & Sons inquired of the board of education of the city of Cleveland for information touching a proposed sale of bonds by said board.

Board of County Com'rs of Wood Co. v. Pargillis

10 Ohio C.C. 376 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1895

In the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Wood County, Ohio, and T. B. Townsend v. … had as to the manner in which this power should be exercised, and while it is not necessary for us to pass upon that question, I desire to call the attention of persons who may be interested to the case of Thomas Brophy v.

State ex rel. Glenn v. Board of Dental Examiners

5 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 55 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1904

What he demands at the hands of the board is the right to practice his profession in Ohio. He had no vested right to do so at the time of the passage of the act.

State ex rel. Fenner v. Board of County Commissioners

20 Ohio C.C. 659 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1900

We are unable to distinguish this case from the oases of Hixson v. Burson, 54 Ohio St., 470 ; State ex rel. v. Davis, 55 Ohio St., 15 , and Mott v.

State ex rel. Baldwin v. Board of County Commissioners

3 Ohio C.C. 403 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1888

The action taken by the board, involved the taking down of the old court house. … Geering, et al. v. The Comm’rs of Henry Co., 31 Ohio St. 211 .

State ex rel. Fanning v. Board of County Commissioners

19 Ohio C.C. 627 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1899

Section 2334b, Revised Statutes, is mandatory and is made condition precedent to be complied with before the board of county commissioners can make a lawful contract, and the certificate is as much a condition precedent as

Steam Canal Boat Tempest v. Board of County Commissioners

13 Ohio C.C. 263 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

The plaintiff in its amended petition sets up the fact of the existence of the board of county commissioners, and the fact that there is a bridge in the - county of Lucas, across the Miami and Lake Erie canal, and that this … so construed as to require a liberal construction of provisions affecting personal liberty, relating to amercement, or of a penal nature. ” In discussing these provisions of the statute, the Supreme Court, in Springfield v.

State ex rel. Mills v. Board of Elections

9 Ohio C.C. 134 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

By its terms the right is conferred upon women to vote only for school directors, members of the board of education or school council. … Upon like reasoning acts of this character have been held valid in Nebraska ex rel. v. Cones, 15 Neb. 444 ; Wheeler v. Brady, 15 Kan. 26 ; Huff v. Cook, 44 Iowa, 639 ; Plummer et al. v. Yost et al., 33 N. E.

State ex rel. Schwartz v. O. & M. R. R.

6 Ohio C.C. 415 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Brown, Shipley & Co. … But if this be not so, and the contract by its terms is not revocable, and is on this account illegal, we would hold on the authority of Griffith v.

State ex rel. Bryce Furnace Co. v. Board of Education

14 Ohio C.C. 15 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

It avers that at the next meeting of the board .after he bids were received, which was held on the 11th day •of January, 1897, the day on which the bids were to be filed *18 with the clerk of the board, they were laid over … that it has demanded of the board that it should award the'contract to the relator.

State ex rel. Coal & Coke Co. v. Board, of Education

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 735 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1895

If an advertisement was necessary, the statute gives the board such right. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose. In ■ this, the case differs from those decided in Beaver v. … Trustees, 19 Ohio St., 97 , and American Clock Co. v. Licking Co., 31 Ohio St., 415 , in which the statutes under which the proceedings was had, required the contract to be made with the lowest bidder. Writ refused.

State ex rel. Coates v. Board of County Commissioners

22 Ohio C.C. 57 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

Pugh, Prosecuting Attorney v. Brewster, Auditor, 44 O. S. 249, is cited in support of the demurrer. … Enoy.of Law,(2nd ed.) 206; Purdy v. Independence, 75 Iowa, 356 ; Fitzpatrick v. Flagg, 5 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 21.

Youmans v. Board of Education of the Pataskala Special School District

13 Ohio C.C. 207 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1896

The control and management of the schools of this state are given the boards of education,given by the statute to the boards of education, and these boards cannot be interfered with in any manner by the court unless there … Edward Kibler and John David Jones, on behalf of the Board of Education, etc.

Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' Electric Railway, Light & Power Co.

9 Ohio C.C. 183 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

It is maintained by counsel for defendant in error that the case of the Commissioners of Gallia County v. Holcomb, 7 Ohio, 232, sustains their position. … Counsel for defendant in error cite Commissioners of Mahoning County v. The Railroad Company, 45 Ohio St., 401 , as sustaining the decision of the trial judge.