Case law

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Berdan & Co.

22 Ohio C.C. 326 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

Co. et al. v. Pontius *334 and Richmond, 19 Ohio St., 222. … The case is found in Wilder v. Merchant's Despatch Transportation Co., 47 Ia., 272 .

Newberry v. State

15 Ohio C.C. 208 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1897

Sections 7249 and 7253,Revised Statutes, Bartlett v. State, 28 Ohio St., 669 . … C., 163; Madden v. Smeltz, 2 C. C., 168; State ex rel. v. Hamilton, 3 C. C. 10; In re. George, 5 C. C. 207-210; and Ex parte Mosler, 8 C.

Miller v. Miller

24 Ohio C.C. Dec. 43 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 2, 1912

In Stevenson v. … In Jones v.

Bennett v. State

10 Ohio C.C. 84 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1894

In the case of Jones v. … In Cantwell v.

Schaal v. Heck

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 596 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1894

In the case of Railroad Co. v. Schultz, 43 O. … S., and also by the case of Railroad Co. v. Webb, 12 O.

Fisher v. Tryon

15 Ohio C.C. 541 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

In the 8 Ohio St., in the original case of Clark v. … And they say in this case of Hawver v. Whalen that they do not dispute the proposition as laid down by the supreme court in Clark v. Fiy.

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Ellis

13 Ohio C.C. 704 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

Ellis v. The New York, Chicago & St. … The case of the Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne and Chicago Railway Company and The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v.

Citizens National Bank v. Wehrle

18 Ohio C.C. 535 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

Wilcox v. Kellogg, 11 Ohio, 394; Fassett v. Traber, 20 Ohio, 540; Doremus v. O’Harra, 1 Ohio St., 45 ; Atkinson v. Tonlinson, Id., 237; Bloom v. Negle, 4 Ohio St., 45 ; Harkrader v. Leiby, Id., 602 ; Dickson v. … Rawson, 5 Ohio St., 218 ; Badaley v. Waters, 7 Ohio St., 359 ; Justice v. Uhl, 10 Ohio St., 170 .

Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Toledo & Michigan, Belt Railway Co.

6 Ohio C.C. 521 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Sec. 6708 provides that: “ A judgment rendered or a final order made by a probate court, justice of the peacé, or any other tribunal, board, or officer exercising judicial functions, and inferior in jurisdiction to the court … Co. v. Hopkins, 19 Ohio St. 279 , it was held that— “The 9th section of the act of April 30, 1852, f to provide for compensation to the owners of private property appropriated for the use of corporations,’ (S.

Smith v. Central District Printing & Telegraph Co.

2 Ohio C.C. 259 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1886

In the ease of Street Railway v. … Upon this question, we have one other decision, made by the supreme court of Illinois, in the case of Board of Trade Tel. Co. v.

Larwill v. Burke

19 Ohio C.C. 513 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

In our own state the case of Williams v. … In the case of Phillips v. State ex rel.

Hatry v. Painesville & Youngstown Railway Co.

1 Ohio C.C. 426 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1886

The precise point is expressly decided in Vanmeter v. Van meter, 3 Gratt., 148 , 162; Tyson v. Wabash Ry. Co. et al., 16 Cent. Law J. (U. S. C. C. Ind.), 251; Perkins v. Gibson, 51 Miss., 699 ., Mitchell v. … Butt., 45 Geo., 162; Pinchain v. Collard, 13 Texas, 333 ; Nichols v. Glover, 41 Ind., 24 ; Latham et al. v. Staples, 46 Ala., 462 ; Hamilton v, Gilbert, 2 Heisk., 680 . See also 2 Jones on Mortg., § 214; 2 Pom.

Corbett v. State

5 Ohio C.C. 155 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1890

Again, in England, in a case reported in Denison’s Crown Cases, vol. 1, p. 319, Queen v. … Breck v. State, 4 C. C. R. 160.

New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Kistler

16 Ohio C.C. 316 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1894

Co, v. … Co. v.

Hayes v. Smith

15 Ohio C.C. 300 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

Our conclusions that the rule is applicable to this case, and that sufficient facts are stated in the amended petition to show joint liability, are supported, we think, by the case of Jack, et al v. … Board of Comr’s. of Jefferson Co.

Simmons v. City of Toledo

8 Ohio C.C. 535 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1890

We have had cited to us the case of Rapp v. R. R., decided by Judge Longworth, in the Superior Court of Cincinnati, and citing a New York case. … Taggart et al. v. Newport Street Ry.