Case law

State ex rel. City of Lima v. Pohling

1 Ohio C.C. 486 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1886

State v. Cincinnati, 20 Ohio St., 18 . … We are sustained in the foregoing positions by the following authorities : McBride v.

Ely v. Ott

14 Ohio C.C. 619 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1897

We find some authority upon- the subject, however,' which seems to deny our right to interfere in a case like this — 41 Neb. 780 , Clark v. Carey: ‘. … Board & Beard, J. K. Hamilton, fox Defendant in Error, J. H. Southard, for Plaintiff in Error. I will say that we affirm this judgment with a very great deal of reluctance.

Rafferty v. Toledo Traction Co.

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 538 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 3, 1903

(Carmong v. … In the 11th Circuit Court Reports, 163 (Board of Education v.

John v. State

5 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 200 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1904

Moore v. Coates, 35 O. S., 177. It was held in the case of Nesbit v. … In the case of Cooper v.

Toledo Electric Street Railway Co. v. Toledo Consolidated Street Railway Co.

10 Ohio C.C. 597 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1893

The court cites in that paragraph, Bowen v. Matheson, 14 Allen, 499 ; Steamship Co. v. McGregor, 23 Q. B. Div, 598, 1892 App. Cas. 25; Parker v. Huntington, 2 Gray, 124 ; Wellington v. Small, 3 Cush. 145 ; Payne v. Ry. … And in such matters courts frequently draw the line very closely, as our own Supreme Court did in a case in 12 Ohio St., that of Frazier v. Brown, page 294.

Moore v. Central Nat. Bank

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 614 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 7, 1910

See Glidden v. Bank, 53 Ohio St. 588 [42 N. E. Rep. 995; 43 L. R. … This principle is stated in the case of Carpenter v.

Bailey v. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co.

4 Ohio C.C. 471 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1890

Among these cases my be cited : Winterbottom v. Wright, 10 M. & W. 109 ; Longmeid v. Halliday, 6 Eng. L. & E. 562; Lock v. Littlefield, 42 N. Y. 351 ; Losee v. Clute, 51 N. Y. 494 ; Collis v. Selden, N. L. R. 3 Com. … Lee & Brown, and J. O. Winnes, for plaintiff in error. Doyle, Bcott & Lewis, for defendant in error.

Telling v. Sullivan

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 312 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 14, 1911

Read, J., in Gibler v. … “An attempt of Benjamin V.

Larwill v. Burke

19 Ohio C.C. 449 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

Hughes v. Brown, 88 Tenn., 578 ; Sidener v. Gilbrath, 63 Ind., 89 ; Merritt v. Monticello, 66 Fed. Rep., 165; White v. Moss, 92 Ga., 244 . … Chinn v.

Protected Home Circle v. Tisch

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 185 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1903

In a recent case, Pfister v. … In Supreme Commandery Knights Golden Rule v.

Grant v. Pittsburgh & Western Ry. Co.

10 Ohio C.C. 362 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1895

Co. v. Jones, were not so pregnant of negligence in the plaintiff, as in the case we are considering. In Winchell v. … Co. v. Crawford, 24 Ohio St. 631 , the same rule was declared as in the Rathgeb case; and in Ry. Co v. Picksley, ib., 254, and Ry. Co. v.

Olcott v. Guerinck

19 Ohio C.C. 32 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

Olcott v. … In Myers v.

McGlynn v. City of Toledo

22 Ohio C.C. 34 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

McAllister v. Tacome, 9 Wash. 272 ; Paving Co. v. Leach, 34 Pac. Rep., 116 ; Bullit v. Selvage, 47 S. W. Rep. 255 ; Boyd v. Milwaukee, 92 Wis., 464 ; People Ex Rel. v. Maher, 63 N. Y., S. C. R., 82; Allen v. … Rep. 509 ; Brown v. Jenks, 98 Cal. 10 ; McDonald v. Mezes 107, Cal. 492; Spangler v. Cleveland, 35 Ohio St , 469.

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. McCamey

12 Ohio C.C. 543 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1896

Co. v. Wymore. … Brown, 6 Am. L. Register, N.

Methodist Protestant Church v. Laws

7 Ohio C.C. 211 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1893

Beard, President of the Board of Trustees. W. F. Lamman, H. M. Harbaugii, Harry L. … Citing Ayer v. Emery, 14 Allen, 70 .

Toledo Bridge Co. v. Yost

22 Ohio C.C. 376 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

as fatal to the claim of good faith and innocent purpose, as would.a direct intent to deceive.” ■ And we are not prepared to say that the action taken by certain officers of this bridge company, in appearing before the board … The case of Hunter, Treasurer v.

Toledo Stove Co. v. Reep

18 Ohio C.C. 58 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1898

It is held in *61 Manufacturing Co. v. … Brown & Geddes, Charles Smeddau, King & Tracy, for Plaintiff in Error. Hurd, Brumback & Thatcher, for Defendant in Error.

Kloeppinger v. Grasser

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 457 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 3, 1903

In Trustees, etc., v. McCaughy, 2 O. … Another case -which has been referred to on this subject is Batugher v.

Weller v. State

19 Ohio C.C. 166 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1899

At noon of the 7th he *168 showed this new weapon to Wise at the hotel where they boarded. … Sutcliffe v. The State 18 Ohio R., 469.

Hinman v. Ryan

3 Ohio C.C. 529 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1888

Hinman, Receiver v. William Ryan and others, and Perry Prentiss, Administrator v. … Now, the character of these mortgages was discussed by the Supreme Court of our state in the leading case of Hagerman et al. v.