Case law

Wittenmeyer v. Board of Education

10 Ohio C.C. 119 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

Y., Lough-ran v. Ross, there was a clause in the lease that the premises should be surrendered in good condition, natural wear and decay only excepted, at the expiration of the lease. In Watriss v. … The Michigan ease is that of Amelia Kerr, Administratrix v. Solomon. O.

United States Board & Paper Co. v. Browne

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 345 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 15, 1903

Browne, was one of the board/ of directors of the defendant; the other members being Charles W. Bell, H. C. Yeiser, Jackson H. Dnnoain and Henry M. Wrigiley. The said Charles W. … not exceed $22.51 per ton for plain, steam dried straw board, free on board, at tbe mill, and tbe price on all other products of the mill shall be on the same relative basis as determined by the board of directors, and tbe

Browne v. United States Board & Paper Co.

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 102 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1909

The answer of the defendant was, first, a general denial of all allegations not therein admitted, and, second, allegations to the effect that the contract was made with Browne, and Stewart while Browne was acting as a director … There was no allegation in the answer that the contract was made by Browne while acting as a director, and that it was an unfair contract. We think under the decision of our Supreme Court in Rolling Stock Co. v.

First National Bank v. Board of Education

15 Ohio C.C. 561 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1897

(Dunn v. Freed, 10 Cir. Ct. 294.) Difficulty arises only when it is sought to apply them to a particular group of facts — in discriminating the different classes of apparatus to which these sections respectively relate. … (Board of Ed. v. Andrews, 51 Ohio St., 199 .) These are the only adjudications upon the sections in question, and were they in no sense authority for us, would have our entire approval.

Caldwell v. Board of County Commissioners

15 Ohio C.C. 167 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1897

Caldwell v. The Board of County *168 Commissioners of Cuyahoga county et al. comes on error into this court,^the demurrer havingj^been^sustained to the-petition, and final judgment entered. … the board of education ought to pay, and then provided that the board of education should levy a tax to pay it.

State ex rel. Cuneo v. Board of Commissioners

16 Ohio C.C. 218 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

One, among many, is found in the-case of Lorain Plank Road Co. v. Cotton, 12 Ohio St., 272 .

State ex rel. Goff v. Board of Ed.

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 337 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

State ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Education

2 Ohio C.C. 557 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1887

The legislature, as to the conduct and management of such schools, and the powers of the board of education, is su *564 preme. … Smith, for board of education. We are of the opinion, then, that the relator is entitled to a peremptory writ as prayed for.

State ex rel. Ferry v. Board of Education

21 Ohio C.C. 785 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

That on the 9th of September, 1889, the board, by resolution of that date, assumed to reduce the compensation of the relator and the other members of the board of examiners to $120 per annum, and from the 1st of September … The claim of counsel for the relator is that the board of education, having, in pursuance of the requirement of the statute, fixed the compensation or salary of the members of the board of examiners,that it had no right during

State ex rel. Ferry v. Board of Education

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 333 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

That on September 9, 1889, the board, by resolution of that date, assumed to reduce the compensation of the relator and the other members of the board of examiners to $120 per annum, and from September 1, *334 1889, till … The claim of counsel for the relator is that the board of education, having, in pursuance of the requirement ol the statute, fixed the compensation or salary of the members of the board of examiners, that it had no right

State ex rel. Welsh v. Board of Education

15 Ohio C.C. 10 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1897

living with him and constituting a part of his family, and entitled to all the rights, privileges and conveniences provided for her by the school laws of the state and that the defendant is the duly organized and acting board … ex rel. v.

State ex rel. Kuehnert v. Board of Education

4 Ohio C.C. 93 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

We think that the action of some members of the Board of Examiners, led the Board of Education to this belief, which they evidently entertained. But Mr. Kuehnert was no party to this arrangement. … This case will be continued for fifteen days, to allow' action upon the part of the board of education.

State ex rel. Merrill v. Board of Education

4 Ohio C.C. 97 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

It must also be conceded on the other side, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Chinn v. … The case of Dutten v.

State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education

13 Ohio C.C. 603 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

We held that an alternative writ of mandamus should not be allowed in this case, for the reason that, by the advertisement made for bids, the right was reserved to the board “to reject any and all bids, ” and that in fact … If an advertisement was necessary, the statute, section 3988, gives the board such right to reject. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose.

State ex rel. Cahoo v. Board of Elections

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 215 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 31, 1898

I read from the case of State-ex rel. v. Archibald, Sheriff, 52 O. S., 1. … intended to abolish the existing board without providing some other board in its place?

State ex rel. Goff v. Board of Education

21 Ohio C.C. 383 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

State ex rel. Gaines v. State Medical Board

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 687 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 5, 1909

State v. Barberton (Bd. of Ed.), 76 Ohio St. 297 [81 N. E. Rep. 568; 10 Ann. Cas. 879]. … How then can we say that the board has abused the discretion vested in it and grant relief, when the rule of law justifying interference by the courts requires that such abuse be clearly shown? Sycamore (Bd. of Ed.) v.

State ex rel. Krejsa v. Board of Education

2 Ohio C.C. 510 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1887

And. it avers that said rules were not regularly suspended by said board, in that they were suspended by a majority only of the members of the board, and not by all the members of the board, nor all the members present. … The Board of Education was composed of twenty members.

State ex rel. Cahoo v. Board of Elections

16 Ohio C.C. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

I read from the case of State ex rel. v. Archibald, Sheriff, 52 Ohio St., 1 . … intended to abolish the existing board without providing some other board in its place?

Browne & Stewart v. United States Board & Paper Co.

20 Ohio C.C. 351 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

The answer of the defendant was first, a general denial of all allegations hot therein admitted, and, second, allegations to the effect that the contract was made with Browne & Stewart while Browne was acting as a director … We think under the decision of our supreme court in the case of Rolling Stock Co. v.