Case law

Moerder v. City of Fremont

19 Ohio C.C. 394 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1899

Held, void as to competent physicians; and so it seems as to hotels, boarding houses and bath-houses.” … Paul v. Smith.

Mathews v. Sylvester

24 Ohio C.C. Dec. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 2, 1912

Bricker, 11 Ohio St. 240 ; Hill v. Butler, 6 Ohio St. 207 ; Picket v. Picket, 6 Ohio St. 525 ; Johnson v. Nyce, 17 Ohio 66 [ 49 Am. Dec. 444 ]; Gest v. Kenner, 12 Dec. Re. 343 (2 Han. 87); Foote v. … Dec. 90 ]; Tuite v. Miller, 10 Ohio 382 ; Innes v. Agnew, 1 Ohio 386 ; Day v. Brown, 2 Ohio 345 ; Stow v. Gilbert, 4 Dec. Re. 252 (1 Clev. L. Rep. 172). Judge Shauck in Peoples’ Sav. Bank Co. v.

First National Bank v. Mansfield Savings Bank

10 Ohio C.C. 233 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1895

the defense of that suit or employing any attorneys; but simply to give the testimony, and give what facts he had as cashier, and that the board considered this in meeting, and gave him directions of that sort.” … And the authority in this state in the case of Reeves, Stephens & Company v.

Detwiler v. City of Toledo

5 Ohio C.C. 360 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1891

V. … V. Herzing, [seal] “Actg. Comm,. Board Pub. Works.” *367 This agreement was recorded in the record of leases of Lucas County, Jan. 20-27th, 1869.

State ex rel. Clark v. Murphy

3 Ohio C.C. 332 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1888

If a suit of this character can be maintained against one subordinate of the board, it may'against all'. … In Alger et al. v.

Phoenix Insurance v. Romeis

15 Ohio C.C. 697 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

To^the®same¿effect is a case in 85 Iowa, 6 (Adams, Admr. v. Ins. … Smith & Baker, for Plaintiff in Error, Brown & Geddes, for Defendant in Error.

Emslie v. Ford Plate Glass Co.

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 603 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 3, 1903

S., p. 1 (Pennsylvania Co. v. … Citing Key v. Vattier, 1 O’hio, 132, and other oases. The last consideration by the Supreme Court of this question is found in 66 O. S., 316 (Brown v. Ginn, Trustee).

State ex rel. Widner v. Bowersock

1 Ohio C.C. 127 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1885

Pierce & Coleman v. The Board of Education of Piqua, in Miami county, where we sustained a motion identical with this. … It was then suggested, that the question is not now concluded by the authority of Chinn v.

Binyon v. Houck

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 15 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 4, 1908

Vail v. Craig, 11 Circ. … Section 4 of the statute provides for the election by the board of deputy supervisors of a chief deputy, and a clerk, and the duties of each are pointed out by the statute.

Mitchell v. State

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 446 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1900

Brown v. State, 18 Ohio St., 496, 497 . In Brown v. … Taft v. Wildman, 15 Ohio, 123; Jones v. State, 20 Ohio, 34; Hills v. Ludwig, 46 Ohio St., 373 , 377.

Swan v. Shahan

1 Ohio C.C. 216 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1885

Per., 355, Rhodes v. Rhodes, 3 Sand. Ch., 279 ; Davidson v. Davidson, 140, 13, N. J. Eq., 220; Brown on Frauds, 213; Vandine v. Vreeland, 12 N. J. Eq., 371; Smith v. Hogden, 62 Mo., 120 ; Hill v. … Brown on Frauds, 273.

Sullivan v. Pausch

5 Ohio C.C. 196 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1891

At the time of the decision in Bloom v. … Burgett v. Burgett, 1 Ohio, 480; Strawn v. Commissioners, 47 Ohio St.-. Paul Jones, City Solicitor, for demurrer. G. C. Williams, contra. The demurrer will be overruled. Shauck, J., dissents.

Shields v. Gibson

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 532 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 25, 1903

In the case of Scott v. … It would seem that the decision in Davis v.

Forrester Plaster Co. v. Cleveland (City)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 231 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 24, 1909

Co. v. Cincinnati, 12 Dec. 218. Also that the interest of a mortgagee in land appropriated by a municipality cannot be taken from him without due process of law. Harrison v. Sabina (Vil.), 1 Circ. Dec. 49 ( 1 R. 49 ). … Judge Spear points out in Joyce v.

Grover Hill v. McClure

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 376 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1905

The petition in each of these cases, Grover Hill '(Vil.) v. George A. McClure and Grover Hill (Vil.) v. William H. … In State v.

Wheeling & Lake Erie R. R. v. Suhrwiar

22 Ohio C.C. 560 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1901

Ry. v. … Ry. v. Geiger, 8 Ohio C. C., 41.

Sharp v. Myers

2 Ohio C.C. 82 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1887

In Vanorden v. Johnson, 14 N. J. … The same conclusion was reached in Coggswell v. Stout, 32 N. J. Eq., 240; McIlvaine v. The Mutual Assurance Co., 93 Pa. St., 30; James v. Brown, 11 Mich., 25 ; Taylor’s Ex’rs v. Maris, 5 Rawle, 51 ; Cheesebrough v.

Westropp v. Westropp

13 Ohio C.C. 244 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

The opinion in the case of Blakeney v. … The case in the 20th Maine, at page 119, of Herrin v.

Toledo Street Railway Co. v. Mammet

13 Ohio C.C. 591 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

Now, the supreme court have several times passed upon that question, and upon this same question in the case of Railway Co. v. … He paid for his board — not exactly for his board, but contributed to the support of the family, to the extent of $10 every two weeks in one season of the year, and more in other seasons.

P., Ft. W. & C. Ry. Co. v. City of Canton

10 Ohio C.C. 414 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1895

We are cited to this case in the 13th Ohio St., case of Lane v. … We are cited to 1 Wendell, case of Brown v. Burton, 341, in which this principle is announced.