Case law

Ohio & Mississippi R. R. v. Sauer

4 Ohio C.C. 466 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1890

, which were inadequate, as defendant well knew, to support said iron while being raised; and while raising the iron, the boards broke, throwing the iron against plaintiff’s leg, tearing away the flesh, splitting the bone … Handy v. Turner, 9 Ohio St. 400 ; Householder v.

Ohio Central Traction Co. v. Mateer

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 478 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 8, 1908

Mansfield, there was a platform used by the defendant for passengers, desiring to get off and on the defendant’s cars; that on October 13, 1903, at about 7 a. m., the plaintiff went to this platform for the purpose ■of boarding … Thereupon error was prosecuted to the Supreme Court, Mateer v.

Sammins v. Wilhelm

6 Ohio C.C. 565 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1892

By section 2332, it is provided that, “If the board of public works, board of improvements, council, or trustee of any municipal corporation deem it necessary to construct a sidewalk on one side only, of any street, alley … We find that in the case of City of Rochester v.

State ex rel. Witt v. Craig

22 Ohio C.C. 135 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

It is claimed, however, that the case of Lewis v. Laylin is overruled or at least modified by the case of Railroad Company v. … No reference is made in this case (Railroad Company v. Defiance) to Lewis v. Laylin which sustains the jurisdiction of the commissioners in improving'a state or county road within the limits of a municipality.

Herrmann v. City of Cincinnati

9 Ohio C.C. 357 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

It is expressly held in the case of State v. Wall et al., 47 Ohio St. 499 , and State v. … And in the case of The State v.

State v. Craig

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 189 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 29, 1901

It is claimed, however, that the case of Lewis v. Laylin is overruled or at least modified by the case of Railroad Co. v. Defiance, 52 Ohio St., 263 [40 N. E. … No reference is made in this case (Railroad Co. v. Defiance) to Lewis v. Laylin, supra, which sustains the jurisdiction of the commissioners in improving a state or county road within the limits of a municipality.

Remington & Son v. Central Press Ass'n

13 Ohio C.C. 542 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

Moore v. Given, 39 Ohio St., 661 . In the case of the State ex rel. v. The Z. & M. … Brown, 11 O. C. C. R., 77, 80.

State ex rel. Richland County v. Williams

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 530 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1908

is rendered on the verdict, such judgment will not be reversed for error in the instructions of the court to the jury relating exclusively to one of the issues. ’ ’ The Supreme Court, in the recent case of Ben Dickerson v. … Beaver have this day submitted to the board of county commissioners a proposal for labor and materials for remodeling the court house at Mansfield, Ohio, as set forth in the proposal hereunto attached.

Stafford v. American Missionary Ass'n

22 Ohio C.C. 399 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

Law Adm., 272; White v. Spaulding, 50 Mich., 22 ; Fox v. Keister, 7 N. P., 327. … Baker v. Lehman; Wright's R., 522; Teaff v. Hewitt, 1 Ohio St., 511 ; Evans v.

Folsom v. Haas

9 Ohio C.C. 473 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1895

V. … This same contention was made in Patton v. Patton, and the case of Burgett v.

Lattimer v. Mosaic Glass Co.

13 Ohio C.C. 163 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1896

The case of Phillips, Beckel & Co. v. The Knox County Mutual Ins. … Citing, in support of this proposition, Frink v. Branch, 16 Conn., 260 .

City of Cincinnati v. Taylor

19 Ohio C.C. 737 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

This was an action for damages for a personal injury arising from the negligence of the city to keep in repair a board sidewalk. … Under these special findings the court ought, in accordance with the syllabus in the ease of Schaeffer v. Sandusky, 33 Ohio St.. 246, to have rendered judgment for the defendant.

Hoshor v. Fairfield Co. (Comrs.)

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 415 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1911

Reading simply from the syllabus of the case, Smith v. Wayne Co. … S.) 233], and as is held in Vermillion v.

Adams v. Parnell

11 Ohio C.C. 567 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1896

forfeiture, but will leave the parties to their legal remedies. ” But the author adds the following: “In some cases, however, the enforcement of *569 a forfeiture may be regarded in equity with favor,” and cites the ease of Brown … v.

Turpie v. Lowe

4 Ohio C.C. 599 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1890

The law in such case is stated in the case of Watson v. … trustee has in his hands money or property of the cestui que trust, which at the time is devoted or pledged to-the payment, or some act is done equivalent to a payment, the resulting trust arises. 1 Perry on Trusts, § 135; Browne

Christoff v. Christoff

6 Ohio C.C. 512 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Christoff, who made no charge for the boarding. This action was brought by Mrs. … In the case of Pretzinger v.

McClain v. McKisson

15 Ohio C.C. 517 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

In Ross v. … In Kinsell v. The City of Auburn, 7 N. Y.

Cincinnati School District v. Oakley Spec. Sch. Dist. No. 11

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 824 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1905

nearest subdistrict or joint sub-district school; or the grades below the high school in special and village district schools; and if under twelve years of age, are permitted to attend the schools under the control 'of boards … State v. Spellmire, 67 Ohio St. 77 [65 N. E. Rep. 619]. Judgment reversed.

State ex rel. Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Betts

4 Ohio C.C. 86 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1889

State ex rel. v. Barnes, 35 Ohio St. 137 ; Ohio ex rel. etc. v. Yeatman, 22 Ohio St. 546 ; Cincinnati Colleqe v. La Rue, 22 Ohio St. 469 ; State v. Cappeller, 39 Ohio St. 460 . … Ross v. Board of Education, 42 Ohio St. 374 .

Carr v. Toledo Traction Co.

19 Ohio C.C. 281 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1900

Thereupon plaintiff alighted and proceeded to board the other car, and when the conductor upon that car came to him for his fare, he told him the circumstances of the case, and requested that he be carried to North Tole- … The syllabus in the case of Roberts v.