Case law

Stambach v. Fox

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 625 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Aug 15, 1898

In view of the holdings of the Supreme Court of this state in the cases of Brown v. Bank, 44 O. S., 269, and Bank v. Johnson, 47 O. S., 306, we are of the opinion that this claim is not well founded. … In Bank v.

State ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney v. Kinney

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 261 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1899

Starbuck, 34 Ohio St., 280 , 285; Johnson v. State, 42 Ohio St., 207 , 210; Board of Education v. … And is in part 1, title 12, third division, “Legislative Department;” chapter 2, “Council and Boards of Aldermen.” • In Board of Education v.

Smith v. Commissioners of Williams County

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 115 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 21, 1905

There are two leading cases of this kind, Alexander v. Brady, 61 Ohio St., 174 , and Commissioners Hardin County v. Coffman, 60 Ohio St., 527 . … Judge Williams, in delivering the opinion of Commissioners Hardin County v.

State ex rel. Klaue v. Barrett

22 Ohio C.C. 104 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

In the case of David Young v. … -the case of Young v.

Sanfleet v. City of Toledo

10 Ohio C.C. 460 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1893

Simmons v. The City of Toledo et al., 5 Ohio Cir. Ct. Rep. 124. And, as bear ing upon this, also, see case of Railway Co. v. Telegraph Association, 48 Ohio St. 392 , especially page 433. Also Railroad Company v. … Herron v.

State ex rel. Hardacre v. Dalton

1 Ohio C.C. 139 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1885

Campbell v. Foster, Governor, 38 O. S., 603, where the court say, “ We fully concede that the duties of the defendant (the canvassing board) were ministerial in their nature.” … Campbell v. Foster, in 38 O.

State ex rel. McKenzie v. Hyman

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 265 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 21, 1901

. *267 The question as to the finding by a majority of the board, which is raised in this case, is found against the relator and is discussed in the opinion delivered in this court at this term in State v. … On the hearing of this case we decided that we could not go into the evidence as to the facts concerning the charges and specifications, nor could we take any evidence concerning the proceeding before the board.

Schamp v. Kennedy

16 Ohio C.C. 604 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1897

This case of Peter Sehamp v. Patrick Kennedy is here on appeal. … The other question is, does the law confer jurisdiction upon the commissioners of Wayne county V It would seem at first blush that there ought to be some constitutional prohibition against the commissioners of one county

O'Donnell v. Schafer

18 Ohio C.C. 525 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

I read, briefly, from the case of Samuel Page v. John Kuykendal, 161 Ill., 319 , as reported in 32 L. R. A., 656. … It was a proper action for the old board to take.

Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. Fries

18 Ohio C.C. 721 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

In the case of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. … Railroad v. Robbins, 35 Ohio St., 531 , distinguished.”

Tyler v. City of Columbus

6 Ohio C.C. 224 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

With all due respect to the judge delivering the opinion in the case of Ryan v. Hoffman, supra, and to the court deciding the case of Rhoades v. … Longworth v. Cincinnati , C. S. C. (special term) 23 W. L. B. 100; Strauss v. Cincinnati , C. S. C. (General term) 24 W. L. B. 422.

Independent Coal Co. v. First National Bank

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 297 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 21, 1905

Nichols v. Gross, 26 Ohio St. 425 ; Osborn v. McClelland, 43 Ohio St. 284 [1 N. E. Rep. 644]. … A question akin to this was raised in the case of Brown v. Ginn, 66 Ohio St. 316 [64 N. E. Rep. 123].

Logan National Bank v. Williamson

2 Ohio C.C. 118 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1887

Strange indeed that the Board of Directors of this National' Bank knew nothing of this transaction. They admit it got $220 in money; its certificate was out for $1,900. … West, Brown & West, for defendant in error. It is urged that the Taylor & Fisher certificate was not endorsed, and hence the bank did not get the legal title.

Winders v. Hudson

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 463 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 21, 1898

The case of Frank Winders v. Robert A. Hudson is before us. … The secretary of the board sent out a publication — a circular asking physicians to send their diplomas to the board and if sent by mail, they would be returned by mail; if sent by express, they would be returned by express

State ex rel. Hosbrook v. Staley

5 Ohio C.C. 602 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1891

See also Ohio v. Wilson, 29th Ohio St. 347, and the case of the State v. Rupp, 4th C. C. … And as stated in the case of Bernier v.

Winders v. Hudson

15 Ohio C.C. 511 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

In the case of Frank Winders v. Robert A. … The secretary of the board sent out a publication — -a circular, asking physicians to send their diplomas to the board,and if sent by mail, they would be returned by mail; if sent by express, they would be returned by express

Perkins v. Zumstein

4 Ohio C.C. 371 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1890

The same information was given by the attorney for James H. to the President of the Board at the office of the Board, where he was apparently presiding, with the clerk and other members, apparently in session. … The case of Moore v. Given, 39 Ohio St. 661 , might, on a superficial view, lead to a contrary opinion. But the facts of the case do not warrant any such view.

Yunker v. Sandusky Co. (Comrs.)

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 552 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1907

(Comrs.) v. Transfer & Stor. Co. 75 Ohio St. 244 [79 N. E. … in equity, involving an injury to any public, state or county road, bridge or ditch, drain or watercourse established by such board in its. county, and for the prevention of injury to the same and any such board of county

Straman v. North Baltimore Water-Works Co.

8 Ohio C.C. 89 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1893

Co. v. Duckworth, 2 Circuit Court Reports, 518). … S., provides : “The corporate powers, business, and property of corporations, formed under this title, must be exercised, conducted and controlled by the board of directors, or, where there is no capital stock, by the board

Bogart v. Cox

4 Ohio C.C. 289 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1890

It must be conceded under the*decision in the case of Courson, ex 'r v. … One of the clearest and most explicit cases we have seen on this point is that of Vaugh v. Hankinson’s Adm’r, 55 N. J.