Case law

Newton v. Toledo City

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 607 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 23, 1892

Attorney General v. Toledo, 25 L. B., 218, the city issued and sold its bonds to the amount of $750,000, and a board of natural gas trustees was appointed as provided in that act. … Bronson v. Oberlin, 41 O. S., 476. And there was this additional difference in the situation of the board here and the board there.

Browne v. Wallace

16 Ohio C.C. 124 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

Browne, for Plaintiff in Error. Wilby & Wald, contra. 2. … In this holding the court follows the decision in Willis, Adm’r. v. Willis, a case from Washington C.

Munsel v. Boyd

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 121 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 11, 1907

The case of Bartholomew v. … We believe these facts justified the election of a full board, and we are satisfied that it was the intention, although not expressed upon the record of these proceedings, to elect a board of five which should constitute

Newton v. City of Toledo

18 Ohio C.C. 756 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Attorney General v. Toledo, 25 L. B., 218, the city issued and sold its bonds to the amount of $750,000, and a board of natural gas trustees was appointed as provided in that act. … Bronson v. Oberlin, 41 O. S., 476.

State v. Turney

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 222 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1909

Potts v. Breen, 167 Ill. 67 [47 N. E. Rep. 81; 39 L. R. A. 152; 59 Am. St. Rep. 262 ]; Mathews v. Kalamazoo (Bd. of Ed.), 127 Mich. 530 [ 86 N. W. Rep. 1036 ; 54 L. R. A. 736]; People v. … Crew, J. in State v. Barberton (Bd. of Ed.), 76 Ohio St. 297 [81 N. E.

Mack, Stadler & Co. v. Great Western Despatch

3 Ohio C.C. 36 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1888

The case of Garrott v. … Di ck v. Railroad Co., 38 Ohio St. 389 .

Jackson Co. v. McGhee

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 106 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1900

This is emphasized moreover by the clause as to “ costs made in said proceedings in the name of the board of county commissioners. ” Manifestly, no right of action against that board was given or intended, so far as the words … Youngstown v. Moore, 30 Ohio St., 133 ; Feuchter v. Keyl, 48 Ohio St., 357 ; Smith v. Commissioners, 50 Ohio St., 628 . This furnishes an additional reason why a forced reading of secs. 4761 and 6448, Rev.

Browne v. Wallace

21 Ohio C.C. 417 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

Browne, has given bond in this court as such assignee, and is entitled to such appeal without giving bond.” It would be enough to rest our decision upon the case of Willis v. … Browne, for Plaintiff in Error. Charles B.

Theobald v. State

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 536 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1908

The act last spoken of was declared by the Supreme Court to be unconstitutional in the case of Harmon v. The State, 66 Ohio St. Rep., 249 . … It is provided in reference to physicians by Section 4403, Revised Statutes, that a board of examiners shall be appointed and that this board shall formulate rules to govern its action.

Bosche v. Toledo Display Horse Co.

14 Ohio C.C. 289 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

But is it void, because it was not legally executed by its board of directors, or by any board of directors? … The case of The Miners’ Ditch Co. v. Zellerbach and Powers, found in 37 California Repts. 543, is a leading case.

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Thompson

9 Ohio C.C. 161 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

Rieter v. The State, (31 W. L. … In Ohio v.

Lewis v. State ex rel. Harrison

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 647 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

Anderson v. Durick, 20 Calif., 94; Love v. Baehr, 47 Calif., 364 Melone v. State, 51 Calif. 549; Green v. State, 51 Calif., 577; Crosman v. Nightingill, 1 Nev., 274 ; State ex rel. Davenport v. … member of the board, the board’s action is so superior to the auditor, and controlling upon him in his official capacity as auditor, that his position on the board can not be considered as an incident or germane duty.

Emmert v. Elyria

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 353 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 8, 1905

It is true that these proceedings did not decisively specify the kind of material to be used, but allowed the board of public service to exercise its discretion in choosing one of the materials named. … We deem it unnecessary now to discuss the objection to which this situation gives rise, inasmuch as this court expressly held at a recent term in this county, in the case *356 of Braman v. Elyria, 26 O. C.

State v. Barrett

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 231 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 21, 1901

In Martin v. … In People v.

Second National Bank v. James Wilcox's Adm'r

2 Ohio C.C. 325 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1887

This case is in principle identical with Jefts et al. v. … This doctrine is re-affirmed and illustrated in Bartlett v. Tucker, 104 Mass., 336 .

Village of Ashtabula v. Bartram

3 Ohio C.C. 640 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1888

City of Aurora v. Brown, 12 Ill. App. 122 . … In Bainbridge v.

State ex rel. Vail v. Craig

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 553 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 17, 1900

The case of Stone v. … In Prince v.

Toledo v. Buechele

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 479 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 5, 1900

The decision in the other case was based to a large extent upon the *481 decision by our Supreme Court in Mays v. … Now this holding as to the power of the legislature over the subject ■of taxation, has been very much modified by a decision to be found in Baker v. Cincinnati, 11 Ohio St., 534 , and also in Marmet v.

Stearns v. John H. Hibben Dry Goods Co.

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 270 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 19, 1908

Whatever be the- nature of the trust created by the resolution of the board of directors.on January 10, 1898, it terminated on or before June 30, 1899, more than six years before the commencement of the action. … Howk v. Minnick, 19 Ohio St. 462 [ 2 Am. Rep. 413 ]; *277 Douglas v. Corry, 46 Ohio St. 349 [21 N. E. Rep. 440; 15 Am. St. Rep. 604 ]; Townsend v. Eichelberger, 51 Ohio St. 213 [38 N. E. Rep. 207]. Judgment affirmed.

Stambach v. Fox

16 Ohio C.C. 427 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

In view of the holdings of the supreme court of this stafe *431 in the cases of Brown v. Bank, 44 Ohio St., 269 , and Bank v. Johnson, 47 Ohio St., 306 , we are of the opinion that this claim is not well founded. … In Bank v.