Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohiocirct

662 results

2.62s

  • City of Toledo v. Buechele

    19 Ohio C.C. 127 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1899

    This question was discussed by the supreme court in the case of Mays v. The City of Cincinnati, 1 Ohio St., 269 , in a decision by Judge Eanney. … The court say, on the same page: “In Steele v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Keeler v. Wagar

    19 Ohio C.C. 149 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

    , as such member of the school board, act. … Monnett, Attorney-General, v James C. McMillan, Vol. 15. Cir. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. State ex rel. Morrow County

    19 Ohio C.C. 191 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1899

    “In Clark v. … Trustees, 7 Ohio St., 13 ; Strawn v. Commissioners, 47 Ohio St., 404 .”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ward v. Hubbard

    12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 87 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 9, 1901

    In Kelley v. … In Palmer v. Tingle, 55 "Ohio St., 423 [45 N. E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Spiegel

    4 Ohio C.C. 388 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1890

    In the case of Baum v. Winston, 3 Met. (Ky.), and in the case of Craig v. Turrett, 1 J. J. Marshall, we find the law to be in accordance with the holding^of the court. … The boarding so much, the washing so much, and the nursing so much. These allegations were all denied by the defendant, and, therefore, became issuable facts in the case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zigler v. Palmer

    10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 545 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1905

    for his services as the' board shall *548 fix; lie shall perform such duties as the board shall impose upon him and be governed in all respects by the rules and regulations of -the board, and may be removed by them at pleasure … In the case of State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nulsen v. Cincinnati

    17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 383 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 11, 1905

    It is claimed, however that this court cannot inquire into the proceedings of the board for the reason that it kept a journal record of its proceedings which imports absolute verity. … Chamberlain v. Cleveland, 34 Ohio St. 551 . The testimony shows that lot No. 43 was of the value of $300 after the improvement, and lot No. 218 was of the value of $625.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jackson v. Kurtz

    11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 705 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 11, 1901

    Attorney General v. Cowles, decided February 5, 1901, 64 Ohio St., 000 , would seem to settle the question. That is the decision ousting the board of park commissioners of this city. … But these rules are only such as are provided by the board itself, and may be changed at any time and the same or similar provisions may be adopted by each of the boards of education in the state. In Weinman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Ambach

    10 Ohio C.C. 490 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

    Co. v. Miller & Co., 85 Ohio St. 548 . … Cummins v. Wood, 14 Ill. 416 ; Brown v. Waterman, 10 Cush, 117; Bennett v. O Brien, 37 Ill. 250 ; Funkhouser v. Wagner, 62 Ill. 50 , This rule follows, ex necessitate, from the nature of the case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Black v. Guernsey Co. (Comrs.)

    21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 659 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1909

    board collects toll; that a culvert crossing said road had been permitted by the defendant board to become so out of repair as to cause a hole or depression five or six feet deep .and four or five feet wide on one side of … We do not think the case of Younker v. Sandusky Co. (Comrs.), 31 O. C. C. 552 (11 N. S. 527), and the other cases cited bear out the contention of the defendant that the provisions of Sec. 845 Rev. Stat. (Gen.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York & B. Co. v. Herrmann

    17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 694 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 24, 1905

    The board plainly set out its intention only to consent to a subletting. … Steinau v. Gas Co. 48 Ohio St. 324 [27 N. E. Rep. 545]. Giffen and Swing, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Dater

    12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 719 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1898

    See Brown v. Coal Company, 48 Ohio St., 542 , and Young v. Shallenberger, 53 Ohio St. 291 . This action not having been commenced within the six months allowed by statute, the case will be stricken from the docket.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nearing v. Toledo Electric Street Railway Co.

    9 Ohio C.C. 596 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 14, 1893

    Other questions that were raised have-been decided by this court in other cases, especially the case-of Sanfleet v. … In Trustees of Green Tp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Schwartz v. City of Cincinnati

    8 Ohio C.C. 523 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1894

    .: The State v. The Judges, page 1, and Walker v. The City of Cincinnati, page 14. 5th. … In the case of The City of Cincinnati v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pollock v. Toland

    1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 315 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 27, 1903

    The pét'ition shall be presented to the board of commissioners at a regular session thereof, and when so presented the board shall cause it to be filed in the office of the county auditor, where it shall be subject to the … In the annexation case of Shugars v. Williams, 50 O.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Euclid Avenue Savings & Banking Co. v. Hubbard

    12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 279 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 21, 1901

    In Kingsborough v. Tousley, 56 Ohio St., 450 [49 N. E. … Ry. v. Minnesota, 134 U. S., 418 [ 10 S. Ct. Rep., 462, 702 ]; Crandall v. Bacon, 20 Wis., 639 [ 91 Am. Dec., 451 ]; Freeman on Judgments, 326 ; Grace v. Mitchell, 31 Wis., 533 , [ 11 Am. Rep., 613 ]; Tin sky v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Frease v. Kreighbaum

    9 Ohio C.C. 619 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1895

    That the Adjutant-General of the state of Ohio has served upon the Board of County Commissioners of Stark county formal written notice that the quarters now being provided by said board are far from satisfactory, and that … We will refer to the recent ease of Wasson et al. v. The Commissioners, 49 Ohio St. 622 . This court considered and passed upon the question arising in that case at a recent term in Wayne county.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Strimple v. Bingham

    14 Ohio C.C. 245 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

    This jurisdiction, however, has been twice, at least, exercised by the supreme court of the state: The State on the relation of Attorney General v. … It is said, however, that in the case of Ohio v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ridenour v. State

    14 Ohio C.C. 393 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1897

    Cricket et al. v. The State, 18 Ohio St. p. 10-24. … In the case of of Shepherd v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mill Creek Valley Street Railway Co. v. Village of Carthage

    18 Ohio C.C. 216 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

    In Brobst v. … Board of Supervisors, Logan Co., v. The City of Lincoln, 81 Ill., 156 ; Thd Union Depot Company v. The City of St. Louis, 76 Mo., 393 ; Grant v. City of Davenport, 18 Iowa, 180 , 187, 188; The City of Atlanta v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.