Case law

Toledo Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. Toledo Electric Street Railway Co.

12 Ohio C.C. 367 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1893

This John Brown was summoned. .His name appears, and Michael Brown was the man who appeared and answered to the name of John. … There was the fact — he answered to the name of John Brown. He was not specifically asked if he was John Brown.

Columbus v. Barr

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 264 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1905

Rep. 266 ]; Weaver v. Toney, 21 Ky. Law 1157 [ 54 S. W. … In the case of Ohio State Journal Co. v. Brown, 10 Circ. Dec. 470 ( 19 R. 325 ), this court held that an independent newspaper was not within the meaning of this section.

Rogers v. Edmund

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 291 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1901

He inducts Brown into the office here. … That states the proposition exactly as we understand the law in Kahn v. Walton, and Lester v.

Pancost v. State ex rel. Pancost

15 Ohio C.C. 246 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1897

But, in Lockwood v. … In the case of Pretzinger v.

Keehn v. City of Wooster

13 Ohio C.C. 270 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

The Board of Education of the City of Huron; but that case is distinguishable from the case at bar in this: there the bonds were issued under a statute which authorized the board of education to issue bonds and apply the … Ogden v. County of Davies, 102 U. S., 634 ; Marsh v. Fulton County, 10 Wall., 676 ; South Ottawa v. Perkins, 94 U. S., 260 ; Northern Bank v Porter Township, 110 U. S., 608 ; Hayes v. Holly Springs, 114 U.

City of Toledo ex rel. Gates v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

4 Ohio C.C. 113 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1889

But in the case of Upington v. … Brown & Geddes, for plaintiff. E. D. Potter, Jr., for defendants.

Madison Munday's Exrs. v. Munday

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1897

The American Board of Foreign Missions v. Nelson, 72 Ill., 564 ; Duryea v. Duryea, 85 Ill., 50 . In the case of Swan v. … This case would seem to be directly opposed to Brown v. Scherrer, supra.

Mundy's Executors v. Mundy

15 Ohio C.C. 155 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1897

The American Board of Foreign Missions v. Nelson, 72 Ill., 564 ; Duryea v. Duryea, 85 Ill., 50 . In the case of Swan v. … This ease would seem to be directly opposed to Brown v. Scherrer, supra.

State ex rel. Hardacre v. Dalton

1 Ohio C.C. 161 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1885

In State v. … Brown. Clerks — F. A. Maxwell, J. A. Royster.

Tracy v. Deatrick

10 Ohio C.C. 111 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1895

In Thomas v. … In Kahn v.

Kerlin Bros. v. Toledo

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 56 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 16, 1900

In Thompson v. … Thompson v.

State ex rel. Ward v. Hubbard

22 Ohio C.C. 252 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

B., 206; State ex Cleveland Park Board Case, see printed syllabus attached. State ex rel. v. Brown, 60 Ohio St., 462 , 470-1; Sutherland, Con. Lim., 162, et seq.; State v. … Hunt, 33 Ohio St,. 169; State v. Burgoyne, 7 Ohio St., 153 ; Com’rs v. Auditor, 1 Ohio St., 322 , 326; State v. Board of Education, 35 Ohio St., 368 ; State v.

Semler v. State

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 581 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1905

He told Brown that the draft had been “arranged for,” and, at his request, Brown gave him five thousand dollars in currency and the note which they held for collection, and with the money Semler absconded, both drafts being … S. 3175q et seq.), declaratory as it is in the main of the common law upon that subject, and especially in view of the discussion of the terms, “cheek” and “draft,” in the case *584 of Oyster & Fish Co. v.

Pease v. Ryan

7 Ohio C.C. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1892

After due publication of the notice, numerous bids were filed upon printed forms with instructions furnished by said board, and for the various kinds of materials aforesaid. … The Board thereupon accepted the bid of Ryan for Medina stone, and entered into a contract with him.

City of Cincinnati v. McMicken

6 Ohio C.C. 188 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

Brown v. Maury, 6 Ohio, 129. And on the authority cited above, if not used, a court of chancery will compel a specific execution of the trust. … The Supreme Court in Board of Education v.

Wood v. State

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 371 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 9, 1907

In the case of Commonwealth v. … The case of Rex v.

Shawnee Commercial & Savings Bank Co. v. Miller

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 569 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1902

Brown, 2 Disn., 395. … In the ease of Yeiser v. Board & Paper Co., 107 Fed. Rep., 340 ( 46 C. C.

Eldridge & Higgins v. Heaton & Co.

7 Ohio C.C. 499 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1893

Referring to the reasoning which is at the foundation of Leroux v. Brown. Willes, J., in Williams v. Wheeler, 8 C. B. N. … If the doctrine of Leroux v. Brown, is law, the converse must be law.

Endley v. Aldrich

15 Ohio C.C. 36 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1896

Aldrich and Cameron, to the proceedings and orders of the Board of County Commissioners of Defiance county. … of County Commissioners had no jurisdiction, for the reason that no bond, as required by law, had ever been filed, making the plaintiff and Board of Commissioners parties defendant in such proceeding.

Rike v. Floyd

6 Ohio C.C. 80 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1891

And in Walker v. … Joseph v. Rogers, 16 Wall. 663 ; Wardens of Christ Church v. Pope, 8 Gray, 140 -43; Richardson v. Society, 58 N. H. 188; Green v. Weller, 32 Miss. 850 ; Prohib. Amen't Cases, 24 Kans. 200 ; Dayton v. St.