Case law

State ex rel. Preston v. Ferguson

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 450 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1960

Upon the final expiration of this agreement, following any renewal period or periods, if any, the director shall purchase from the board all parcels acquired by the board pursuant to this agreement. 11 * * * “7. … recognized in the relator’s brief where it is stated that “if any claim remains unpaid at the end of a biennium for which an appropriation for it has been made, then such claim becomes a debt of the state. ’ ’ Also in State v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson

95 Ohio St. 3d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 2002

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HENDERSON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Henderson, 2002-Ohio-1756.] … The board adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the panel. {¶12} On review of the record, we adopt the findings and conclusions but not the recommendation of the board.

Beck v. Cianchetti

1 Ohio St. 3d 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1982

Whitt v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur in the majority opinion as to Part II thereof but dissent as to Part I of the majority opinion.

State v. Stricklen

63 Ohio St. 2d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1980

United States v. Wade (1967), 388 U.S. 218 ; Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 U.S. 263 ; Moore v. Illinois (1977), 434 U.S. 220 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Bell, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

State ex rel. Davet v. Sutula

131 Ohio St. 3d 220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 29, 2012

Washington v. … Mason v.

State ex rel. Mileff v. Mifflin Township

49 Ohio St. 3d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1990

Temke, v. Outcalt (1977), 49 Ohio St. 2d 189 , 3 O.O. 3d 248, 360 N.E. 2d 701 . The matter is remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to allow appellants to file an answer per Civ. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents.

Vulcan Materials Co. v. Industrial Commission

25 Ohio St. 3d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1986

Further, in Logsdon v. Indus. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Weir v. Rimmelin

15 Ohio St. 3d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1984

Advertising Co. v. State (1977), 91 N.M. 191 , 571 P. 2d 1194 ; Markham Advertising Co. v. … Brown, JJ., dissent. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

State ex rel. Questor Corp. v. Industrial Commission

70 Ohio St. 2d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1982

G F Business Equip., Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 446, 447 ; quoting from State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 16 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Greene

74 Ohio St. 3d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1995

In Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Griffin v. Industrial Commission

70 Ohio St. 2d 264 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1982

Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 16 ; State, ex rel. Reed, v. Indus. Comm. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 200 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Chadwick v. Barba Lou, Inc.

69 Ohio St. 2d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1982

McWhirt v. McKee (1870), 6 Kan. 412 ; Meyer v. Wilson (1930), 131 Kan. 717 , 293 P. 738 ; Wilson v. Wheeler (1911), 28 Okla. 726 , 115 P. 1117 . … See Cash v. Cincinnati (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 319 . For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Judgment reversed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Woods v. Telb

89 Ohio St. 3d 504 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 2000

Bray v. Russell (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 132, 135 , 729 N.E.2d 359, 362 . … State v. Sinito (1975), 43 Ohio St.2d 98, 101 , 72 O.O.2d 54, 56 , 330 N.E.2d 896, 898 , citing State ex rel. Prospect Hosp. v. Ferguson (1938), *517 133 Ohio St. 325 , 10 O.O. 493 , 13 N.E.2d 723 ; Wilson v.

Osborn v. Low

40 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1883

Defendant in error claims that the record shows no binding contract, and that this case is identical with Jones v. Brown, 11 Ohio St., 601 . It is true the parol agreement was merged in the note. … The case of Jones v. Brown, supra, was substantially like the case in hand with the significant exception that the note taken by the creditor was payable immediately.

Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lutseck

161 Ohio St. 3d 1241 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2020

Bar Assn. v. Lutseck, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4837.] TRUMBULL COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. LUTSECK. [Cite as Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. … V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

Disciplinary Counsel v. Andrews

2024 Ohio 87 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2024

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Andrews, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024-Ohio-87.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANDREWS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Andrews, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024-Ohio-87.] … V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

State v. Arnett

22 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1986

A comparable situation was presented to this court in State v. Keeton (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 379 . … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and .Sweeney, J., dissent.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus

91 Ohio St. 3d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2001

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. KRAUS. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus, 2001-Ohio-234.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). {¶ 2} Based on stipulations and testimony received at the hearing

City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget Commission

90 Ohio St. 3d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 8, 2000

In reviewing a decision of the BTA, this court is not a “super” Board of Tax Appeals. Hercules Gallon Products, Inc. v. Bowers (1960), 171 Ohio St. 176 , 12 O.O.2d 292 , 168 N.E.2d 404 . … Park Dist. v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm. (Dec. 19, 1994), BTA No. 93-D-1174, unreported.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Neal

113 Ohio St. 3d 461 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 2007

V(11)(B). … V(6)(L), the board considered and adopted the master commissioner’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and it has recommended that we permanently disbar Neal. {¶ 10} Having reviewed the matter, we agree that respondent