Case law

Reeves v. Thomas, Warden

122 Ohio St. 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1930

The effect of Section 2166 was to place all persons sentenced under this indeterminate sentence law under the jurisdiction of the Ohio board of administration (now board of clemency, Sections 91 and 92, General Code), and … We cannot take the view that the board has the power to reduce the minimum fixed by the trial judge.

Gen. Motors Corp. v. Tracy

69 Ohio St. 3d 1482 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1994

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 92-K-146. On motion to consolidate case with 94-643, Gen. Motors Corp. v. Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 92-K-510, and 94-744, Gen. Motors Corp. v. Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 91-K-1558.

Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. Bowers

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1960

In our opinion, the board’s finding in this respect was neither unreasonable nor unlawful. See V. N. Holderman Paving Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., ante, 275. … See Umon Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Bowers, supra, at 424, 425.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova

1993 Ohio 87 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1993

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova (1993), Ohio St.3d .] … We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, we differ with the board's recommendation. We order instead that respondent by publicly reprimanded.

In re D.J.S.

130 Ohio St. 3d 257 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2011

. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of State v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

72 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1995

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MESI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi, 1995-Ohio-69.] … The board's recommended sanction, however, is not appropriate. {¶ 6} We, like the court in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

86 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1999

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Generally, neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing investigation warrant an indefinite suspension. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … As the board concluded, respondent’s concealment of assets, neglect, and abandonment of the estate case compounded by his total lack of cooperation with and respect for the disciplinary process require an indefinite suspension

State ex rel. McGuire v. Abruzzo

133 Ohio St. 3d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2012

See DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Dennis B.

State ex rel. Beatrice Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

1994 Ohio 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1994

Beatrice Foods, Inc., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Beatrice Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1994), Ohio St. 3d .] … Brown, Dillahunt and Gillis, a consideration of the claimant's age, education * * *.

Zell v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

78 Ohio St. 3d 330 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1997

ZELL, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; CINCINNATI SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Zell v. … Zindle v. Summit Cty.

SSD Distribution System, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

43 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1989

Co. v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Wright, J., dissents. Holmes, J., not participating.

State Ex Rel. Hayes v. Heiser

149 Ohio St. 188 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1948

See State, ex rel. *191 Hayes, v. Pfeiffer et al., Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Pension Fund of City of Columbus, 132 Ohio St., 335 , 7 N. E. (2d), 409. … (Mell et al., Trustees, v. State, ex ret. Fritz, 130 Ohio St., 306 , 199 N. E., 72 .)

Disciplinary Counsel v. Felman

72 Ohio St. 3d 483 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1995

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FELMAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Felman, 1995-Ohio-231.] … A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court ("board") considered the matter on the parties' "Agreed Stipulations, Recommendation for Sanctions, and Waiver of Hearing." {

State ex rel. Lawrence v. American Lubricants Co.

40 Ohio St. 3d 321 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1988

Jennings, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 101 , 1 OBR 135, 438 N.E. 2d 420 . In State, ex rel. Stephenson, v. Indus. … Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

City of Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1913

In the case of Rockport v. … Co. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony

165 Ohio St. 3d 1228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 6, 2021

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-2690.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ANTHONY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Marcelle Rose Anthony, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

Wilson v. Hudson

127 Ohio St. 3d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2010

[Cite as Wilson v. Hudson, 127 Ohio St.3d 31, 2010-Ohio-4990.] WILSON, APPELLANT, v. HUDSON, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Wilson v. Hudson, 127 Ohio St.3d 31, 2010-Ohio-4990.] … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Lawrence E. Wilson, pro se.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Bell

78 Ohio St. 3d 88 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1997

Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 369, 372 , 667 N.E.2d 1186, 1188-1189 . … V(9). The monitoring attorney will report monthly to the relator.

Holladay Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

61 Ohio St. 2d 335 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1980

Brown, J. I. Appellant argues primarily that D P & L has violated R. … See Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1962), 173 Ohio St. 478 , paragraph ten of the syllabus.

State v. Thacker

54 Ohio St. 2d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1978

Accordingly, the defendant’s request,for transcripts' of testimony from his first trial was improperly overruled and, on authority of State v. … Brown, Sweeney and Looker, JJ., concur.