Case law

Latina v. Woodpath Development Co.

57 Ohio St. 3d 212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1991

Blosser v. Enderlin (1925), 113 Ohio St. 121 , 148 N.E. 393 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co. (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 241 , 7 O.O. 3d 403, 374 N.E. 2d 146 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

State v. Cherif

128 Ohio St. 3d 356 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2011

[Cite as State v. Cherif, 128 Ohio St.3d 356, 2011-Ohio-956.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CHERIF, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Cherif, 128 Ohio St.3d 356, 2011-Ohio-956.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney

Streetsboro Edn. Assn. v. Streetsboro City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

68 Ohio St. 3d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1994

STREETSBORO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ET AL., APPELLEES, v. STREETSBORO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Streetsboro Edn. Assn. v. Streetsboro City School Dist. … Rollins v. Cleveland Hts.-University Hts.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Saumer

86 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1999

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Generally, neglect of legal matters and a failure to cooperate in the ensuing investigation warrant an indefinite suspension. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … As the board concluded, respondent’s concealment of assets, neglect, and abandonment of the estate case compounded by his total lack of cooperation with and respect for the disciplinary process require an indefinite suspension

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Bogart

86 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1999

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 7 , 697 N.E.2d 597 , and Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Schuman

81 Ohio St. 3d 185 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1998

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. SCHUMAN. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Schuman, 1998-Ohio-639.] … After respondent filed his answer, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) heard testimony and received a stipulation of facts. {¶ 2} The panel found that

State ex rel. Beatrice Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

1994 Ohio 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1994

Beatrice Foods, Inc., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees. [Cite as State ex rel. Beatrice Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1994), Ohio St. 3d .] … Brown, Dillahunt and Gillis, a consideration of the claimant's age, education * * *.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison

118 Ohio St. 3d 128 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2008

See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Ellison (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 131 , 552 N.E.2d 930 . … V(9).

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Meyer

95 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2002

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. MEYER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Meyer, 2002-Ohio-1941.] … Upon adopting the master commissioner’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, the board accepted this recommendation. {¶ 6} On review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and agree that

State ex rel. L&K Restaurants & Motels v. Industrial Commission

56 Ohio St. 3d 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1990

Ormet Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1990), 54 Ohio St. 3d 102 , 561 N.E. 2d 920 , the judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jackson

78 Ohio St. 3d 463 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1997

We accept the findings and conclusions of the board. In a previous case involving failure to file an Ohio estate tax return, we imposed a public reprimand. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. … We therefore accept the board’s recommendation and suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, but we stay the entire suspension subject to respondent’s being monitored for the duration of the suspension as

Disciplinary Counsel v. Crowley

76 Ohio St. 3d 365 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1996

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CROWLEY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Crowley, 1996-Ohio-391.] … Bar Assn. v. Speros (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 101, 104, 652 N.E. 2d 681, 683. In view of respondent’s mitigating evidence, we concur in the board’s recommendation of a limited suspension.

State ex rel. Peterson v. Durkin

129 Ohio St. 3d 213 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2011

Peterson v. Durkin, 129 Ohio St.3d 213, 2011-Ohio-2639.] THE STATE EX REL. PETERSON, APPELLANT, v. DURKIN, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Peterson v. … Pruitt v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 125 Ohio St.3d 402, 2010-Ohio-1808, 928 N.E.2d 722, ¶ 4; Watkins v.

State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield

64 Ohio St. 3d 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1992

Subsequent to the decision below and the filing of briefs before this court, Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624 , 576 N.E.2d 722 , was decided. … Brown, J., not participating.

Ohio Council 8, Am. Fedn. of State, Cty. & Mun. Emp., AFL-CIO v. Summit Cty. Child Support Enforcement Agency

1994 Ohio 482 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1994

Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, et al., Cross-Appellants, v. Summit County Child Support Enforcement Agency; State Employment Relations Board, Cross-Appellee. … Emp., AFL-CIO v. Summit Cty. Child Support Enforcement Agency (1994), Ohio St.3d .]

Settlemyer v. Wilmington Veterans Post No. 49, American Legion, Inc.

11 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1984

See, also, Townsley v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in judgment.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Qucsai

2021 Ohio 299 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2021

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Qucsai, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-299.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. QUCSAI. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Robert James Qucsai III, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Kaser

56 Ohio St. 3d 703 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1990

Co. v. Kaser, Ottawa County, No. OT-89-6. Motion granted. Sua sponte, the motion to certify in 90-1884 is allowed. Moyer, C.J., Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Linick

84 Ohio St. 3d 489 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1999

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. On review of the record, we find that respondent’s conduct violated DR 2-107(A)(l) and 5-107(A)(2) as found by the board. In Ohio State Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Moulton v. Myers

99 Ohio St. (N.S.) 26 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1918

The statute which confers upon the presidents of the boards of education of the various village and rural school districts of each county authority to elect a member of the county *27 board of education each year, does not … Morris, v.