Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.50s
75 Ohio St. 3d 477 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1996
Both the Tax Commissioner and the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals found that appellant is derivatively liable for the penalties and interest as well as the tax. … Storer Communications, Inc. v. Limbach (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 193, 194 , 525 N.E.2d 466, 467 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedRocco v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
1994 Ohio 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1994
Rocco, Appellant, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Rocco v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 13, 73 O.O.2d 83, 336 N.E.2d 433, paragraph four of the syllabus. See, also, Crow v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. Meagher
82 Ohio St. 3d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1998
Appellants claimed to represent the church as its board of trustees. … The common pleas court dismissed the complaint because it concluded that under the church’s constitution, the proper governing body of the church was its board of directors rather than the board of trustees. {¶ 2}
Cited 16 timesPublished78 Ohio St. 3d 463 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1997
We accept the findings and conclusions of the board. In a previous case involving failure to file an Ohio estate tax return, we imposed a public reprimand. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. … We therefore accept the board’s recommendation and suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, but we stay the entire suspension subject to respondent’s being monitored for the duration of the suspension as
Cited 4 timesPublishedAnderson v. Ohio Department of Insurance
58 Ohio St. 3d 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1991
As the Kentucky Supreme Court stated in Commonweath Dept. of Banking & Securities v. Brown (1980), 605 S.W. 2d 497 : “* * * There is no public policy requiring government to guarantee the success of its efforts. … Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, 96 Ohio St. 3d 266 (2002)Cited 24 timesPublishedTrumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Makridis
77 Ohio St. 3d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1996
TRUMBULL COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. MAKRIDIS. [Cite as Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Makridis, 1996-Ohio-351.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Directly communicating with an adverse party. … Based on the complaint, answer and stipulation, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) found that in October 1993 the respondent had filed a personal injury action
Cited 1 timesPublished136 Ohio St. 514 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1940
The Court of Appeals relied upon the case of City of Cuyahoga Falls, v. Beck, 110 Ohio St., 82 , 143 N. … The same fundamental principle, applicable to failure to pursue statutory remedies after notice, was enunciated also in Bashore v. Brown, Treas., 108 Ohio St., 18 , 140 N. E., 489 , and Hammond, Treas., v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Macurdy
56 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990
V(44), we disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1914
Chapman v. Miller et al., 52 Ohio St., 166 . … jurisdiction of the board of deputy state supervisors ended.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Jackson v. Allen
65 Ohio St. 3d 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1992
Hanley v. Roberts (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 1, 4 , 17 OBR 1, 3, 476 N.E.2d 1019 . 1021-1022. *39 In the underlying criminal cases, Whitman filed a motion to dismiss the indictments. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 10 timesPublishedValvoline Instant Oil Change, Inc. v. Tracy
75 Ohio St. 3d 1407 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1996
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1179. On motion to consolidate case with 96-53, Ashland Branded Marketing, Inc. v. Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1180, and 96-54, SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. … Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1181. Motion granted.
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2004
.” {¶ 2} A three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommended a six-month stayed suspension and upon review, the entire board recommended a public reprimand. … Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Consoldane (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 337 , 4 O.O.3d 477 , 364 N.E.2d 279 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedCuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian
87 Ohio St. 3d 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1999
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. … Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185 , 580 N.E.2d 1076 .
Cited 5 timesPublished1 Ohio St. 2d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1965
appearing that defendant did not have counsel, that his right to counsel was not explained to him, and that he did not waive his right to counsel, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Johnson v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublished67 Ohio St. 2d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1981
Mingo Junction v. Sheline (1935), 130 Ohio St. 34, 37 ; Smith v. Rhodes (1903), 68 Ohio St. 500, 505 ; Bean v. Green (1878), 33 Ohio St. 444 , paragraph six of the syllabus; Neff v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Victor and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J.
Cited 96 timesPublishedOhio Domestic Violence Network v. Public Utilities Commission
65 Ohio St. 3d 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1992
We explained that a “final order” under former G.C. 544, now R.C. 4903.13, is one “affecting a substantial right” (see R.C. 2505.02; Hall China Co. v. Pub. Util. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 17 timesPublished62 Ohio St. 3d 1423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1991
On motion to consolidate with 90-1898, State v. Pierce, Delaware County, No. 89-CA-30. Motion denied. Holmes, J., dissents. H. Brown, J., would stay decision on this motion pending receipt of briefs in both cases.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMeijer Realty Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
71 Ohio St. 3d 1413 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1994
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-R-1047. Sua sponte, this cause is consolidated with.94-790, Thrifty Findlay, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-M-1050; 94-791, Thrifty Findlay, Inc. v. … Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-H-1051; and 94-888, Meijer Realty Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, No. 93-A-1046.
Cited 0 timesPublished128 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2011
[Cite as State v. Overton, 128 Ohio St.3d 353, 2011-Ohio-740.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. OVERTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Overton, 128 Ohio St.3d 353, 2011-Ohio-740.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Cited 2 timesPublished62 Ohio St. 3d 1429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1991
V(9)(a)(iii), Ralph Jones, Registration No. 0029158, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna