Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Soltesiz v. Tracy

    75 Ohio St. 3d 477 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1996

    Both the Tax Commissioner and the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals found that appellant is derivatively liable for the penalties and interest as well as the tax. … Storer Communications, Inc. v. Limbach (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 193, 194 , 525 N.E.2d 466, 467 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rocco v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

    1994 Ohio 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1994

    Rocco, Appellant, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Rocco v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 13, 73 O.O.2d 83, 336 N.E.2d 433, paragraph four of the syllabus. See, also, Crow v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. Meagher

    82 Ohio St. 3d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1998

    Appellants claimed to represent the church as its board of trustees. … The common pleas court dismissed the complaint because it concluded that under the church’s constitution, the proper governing body of the church was its board of directors rather than the board of trustees. {¶ 2}

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Jackson

    78 Ohio St. 3d 463 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1997

    We accept the findings and conclusions of the board. In a previous case involving failure to file an Ohio estate tax return, we imposed a public reprimand. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. … We therefore accept the board’s recommendation and suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, but we stay the entire suspension subject to respondent’s being monitored for the duration of the suspension as

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Ohio Department of Insurance

    58 Ohio St. 3d 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1991

    As the Kentucky Supreme Court stated in Commonweath Dept. of Banking & Securities v. Brown (1980), 605 S.W. 2d 497 : “* * * There is no public policy requiring government to guarantee the success of its efforts. … Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, 96 Ohio St. 3d 266 (2002)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Makridis

    77 Ohio St. 3d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1996

    TRUMBULL COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. MAKRIDIS. [Cite as Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Makridis, 1996-Ohio-351.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Directly communicating with an adverse party. … Based on the complaint, answer and stipulation, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) found that in October 1993 the respondent had filed a personal injury action

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wagner v. Messner, Aud.

    136 Ohio St. 514 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1940

    The Court of Appeals relied upon the case of City of Cuyahoga Falls, v. Beck, 110 Ohio St., 82 , 143 N. … The same fundamental principle, applicable to failure to pursue statutory remedies after notice, was enunciated also in Bashore v. Brown, Treas., 108 Ohio St., 18 , 140 N. E., 489 , and Hammond, Treas., v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Macurdy

    56 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

    V(44), we disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Scott v. Swan

    91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 61 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1914

    Chapman v. Miller et al., 52 Ohio St., 166 . … jurisdiction of the board of deputy state supervisors ended.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Jackson v. Allen

    65 Ohio St. 3d 37 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1992

    Hanley v. Roberts (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 1, 4 , 17 OBR 1, 3, 476 N.E.2d 1019 . 1021-1022. *39 In the underlying criminal cases, Whitman filed a motion to dismiss the indictments. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Valvoline Instant Oil Change, Inc. v. Tracy

    75 Ohio St. 3d 1407 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1996

    Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1179. On motion to consolidate case with 96-53, Ashland Branded Marketing, Inc. v. Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1180, and 96-54, SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. … Tracy, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-B-1181. Motion granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Brien

    103 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2004

    .” {¶ 2} A three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommended a six-month stayed suspension and upon review, the entire board recommended a public reprimand. … Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Consoldane (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 337 , 4 O.O.3d 477 , 364 N.E.2d 279 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian

    87 Ohio St. 3d 147 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1999

    We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. … Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185 , 580 N.E.2d 1076 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Green

    1 Ohio St. 2d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1965

    appearing that defendant did not have counsel, that his right to counsel was not explained to him, and that he did not waive his right to counsel, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Johnson v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Chapin

    67 Ohio St. 2d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1981

    Mingo Junction v. Sheline (1935), 130 Ohio St. 34, 37 ; Smith v. Rhodes (1903), 68 Ohio St. 500, 505 ; Bean v. Green (1878), 33 Ohio St. 444 , paragraph six of the syllabus; Neff v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Victor and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Victor, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Holmes, J.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Ohio Domestic Violence Network v. Public Utilities Commission

    65 Ohio St. 3d 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1992

    We explained that a “final order” under former G.C. 544, now R.C. 4903.13, is one “affecting a substantial right” (see R.C. 2505.02; Hall China Co. v. Pub. Util. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Thomas

    62 Ohio St. 3d 1423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1991

    On motion to consolidate with 90-1898, State v. Pierce, Delaware County, No. 89-CA-30. Motion denied. Holmes, J., dissents. H. Brown, J., would stay decision on this motion pending receipt of briefs in both cases.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meijer Realty Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

    71 Ohio St. 3d 1413 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1994

    Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-R-1047. Sua sponte, this cause is consolidated with.94-790, Thrifty Findlay, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-M-1050; 94-791, Thrifty Findlay, Inc. v. … Bd. of Revision, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 93-H-1051; and 94-888, Meijer Realty Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, No. 93-A-1046.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Overton

    128 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2011

    [Cite as State v. Overton, 128 Ohio St.3d 353, 2011-Ohio-740.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. OVERTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Overton, 128 Ohio St.3d 353, 2011-Ohio-740.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Jones

    62 Ohio St. 3d 1429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1991

    V(9)(a)(iii), Ralph Jones, Registration No. 0029158, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.