Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer

2026 Ohio 1117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 2026

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer, 2026-Ohio-1117.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROMER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Romer, 2026-Ohio-1117.] … V(25)(E), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct.

State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979

Niles, v. Bernard (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 31, 33 . In paragraph one of the syllabus in Zavatsky v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Parker v. Russo

131 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2012

Parker v. Russo, 131 Ohio St.3d 175, 2012-Ohio-541.] THE STATE EX REL. PARKER, APPELLANT, v. RUSSO, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Parker v. Russo, 131 Ohio St.3d 175, 2012-Ohio-541.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Jenkins v. Billy

43 Ohio St. 3d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1989

Bland v. Holden (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 238, 239 , 50 O.O. 2d 477, 257 N.E. 2d 397, 398 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964

Much evidence was offered before the board, some of which is conflicting. … Fouss v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 171 Ohio St., 226 . Prom an examination of the record in this case, this court is of the opinion that the order of the board is neither unreasonable nor unlawful.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. O'Brien

103 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2004

.” {¶ 2} A three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommended a six-month stayed suspension and upon review, the entire board recommended a public reprimand. … Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Consoldane (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 337 , 4 O.O.3d 477 , 364 N.E.2d 279 .

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Candiello

85 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1999

We adopt the findings of the board. … Nevertheless, for reasons which we expressed in Disciplinary Counsel v.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer

90 Ohio St. 3d 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2000

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. PALMER. [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Palmer, 2000-Ohio-95.] … Respondent failed to answer but filed a letter with the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”) admitting the allegations set forth in the complaint. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

Zion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Creasy

6 Ohio St. 3d 221 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1983

As this court recognized in LaBarbera v. … Brown, Pryatel and Holmes, JJ., concur. *226 Sweeney, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent. Pryatel, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. This court held in State, ex rel.

Freshour v. Radcliff

35 Ohio St. 3d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1988

Westchester, v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42 , 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81 , paragraph one of the syllabus. Clearly, appellant could not and cannot sustain this burden. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Karb v. State

54 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1896

act — pensioning firemen — is of a general nature, and it seems to be so, it is difficult to maintain the constitutionality of the act, in view of the recent decision of this court in the ease of the City of Cincinnati v. … Failure of the board to act, would not supply the place of favorable action by the board, because upon acting on the application, the board might find and determine that the alleged disability was not “ caused in, or induced

Freshour v. Tate

62 Ohio St. 3d 410 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1992

Parker v. Maxwell (1963), 174 Ohio St. 471 , 473, 23 O.O.2d 116 , 117, 190 N.E.2d 271 , 273. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Standard Oil Co. v. Zangerle

144 Ohio St. 523 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1945

The Board of Tax Appeals classified them all as real property. The Standard Oil Company operates two refineries *525 in the city of Cleveland. … However, the board announced a finding “that such equipment is realty,” stating as a reason for such finding, “the broad language used by the Supreme Court,” in Case Manufacturing Co. v. Garven, 45 Ohio St., 289 , 13 N.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley

2025 Ohio 3042 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2025

V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Cam Ryan Stanley, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board. … V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

Werk v. Werk

17 Ohio St. 3d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 1985

CA83-07-049 as being in conflict with Leonti v. Leonti (1983), 8 Ohio App. 3d 129 , and Alban v. Alban (1981), 1 Ohio App. 3d 146 , is reversed and the cause is remanded on authority of McClain v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

134 Ohio St. 3d 490 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

[Cite as Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame, 134 Ohio St.3d 490, 2012-Ohio-5698.] BURLINGAME, APPELLEE, v. ESTATE OF BURLINGAME ET AL., APPELLEES; COOMBS ET AL., APPELLANTS. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Shinaver v. Szymanski

14 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1984

Cascone v. Herb Kay Co. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 155 ; Mudrich v. … Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Aldrich

93 Ohio St. 3d 625 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2001

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. ALDRICH. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Aldrich, 2001-Ohio-1887.] … Taylor v. Franklin Blvd.

In re First National Bank

37 Ohio St. 2d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1974

In the case of Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co. (1949), 1 N. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, Stern and P. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Bonham v. Taylor

10 Ohio St. 108 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1840

Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 ; Comm’rs Gallia Co. v. Holcomb, 7 Ohio, 232, pt. 2. … The agreed case shows there had been no full compliance with this provision, but a board on the west side of the river, and at the west end of the bridge only.