Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark

78 Ohio St. 3d 302 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1997

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CLARK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark, 1997-Ohio-215.] … Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Droe (1996), 77 Ohio St. 3d 89, 671 N.E.2d 230.

Cambridge Arms, Ltd. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

69 Ohio St. 3d 337 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1994

CAMBRIDGE ARMS, LTD., APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cambridge Arms, Ltd. v. Hamilton Cty. … Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, supra, at 202, 527 N.E.2d at 878; Crow v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 55, 57, 552 N.E.2d 892, 893; and Ohio Region Senior Citizens Hous. Corp. v.

Jones v. Commissioners

57 Ohio St. (N.S.) 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1897

In the case of Lewis et al. v. … Cricket v. The State, supra.

Sech v. Rogers

6 Ohio St. 3d 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1983

Snyder v. Stanford (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 31 [ 44 O.O.2d 18 ]. … Brown, Locher, Holmes and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., dissent. By reason of our recent holdings in the trilogy of Wilfong v. Batdorf (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 100 , Anderson v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber

81 Ohio St. 3d 1475 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1998

V(6)(L), by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (the “board”). The report named both Robert W. Worth and Donald L. Weber as respondents. … Upon review of the board’s certified report, it appears that the complaint against respondent Donald L. Weber had been dismissed by the board, and therefore Donald L.

State v. Hamilton

75 Ohio St. 3d 636 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1996

Bird v. Summit Cty. (C.A.6, 1984), 730 F.2d 442, 444 . Instead, expungement is an act of grace created by the state. Compare Escoe v. … Compare Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal & Corr. Complex (1979), 442 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 99 S.Ct. 2100, 2108 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668, 680-681 ; State v.

In re Harter

137 Ohio St. 3d 1258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2013

V(5)(A), the secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child-support order by Brian Wade … V(8)(G)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board of

State ex rel. Neff v. Corrigan

75 Ohio St. 3d 12 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1996

See, generally, Browne, Motions to Strike, Ohio Civil Practice Journal (January/Feb *15 ruary 1990) 29-30; 1 Klein, Browne & Murtaugh, Baldwin’s Ohio Civil Practice (1995) 62, Section T 15.01(A)(1)(b); Staff Note 6 to Civ.R … Newton v.

Cleveland Bar Assn v. Morrison

96 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2002

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. MORRISON. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Morrison, 2002-Ohio-2991.] … , we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.

Winchester v. Pike

22 Ohio St. 3d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1986

This cause on appeal from the court of appeals (case No. 10-196) is reversed on authority of Anson v. Tyree (1986), 22 Ohio St. 3d 223 , decided this date. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

State v. Graven

54 Ohio St. 2d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1978

State v. Williams (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 112 ; State v. Gordon (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 45 ; State v. Lancaster (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 83 ; State v. Davis (1964), 1 Ohio St. 2d 28 . … Brown and Looher, JJ, concur. Celebrezze, W. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Purola

168 Ohio St. 3d 1247 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 2022

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Purola, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-1476.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PUROLA. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Albert Linden Purola, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

State ex rel. Guthrie v. Fender (Slip Opinion)

168 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 17, 2022

The Ohio Parole Board later modified the sanction, indicating that Guthrie would not be considered for release until June 2025. … In addition to Fender, Guthrie named Handwerk, chair of the parole board, as a respondent in his petition.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball

85 Ohio St. 3d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1999

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, because we find respondent’s offenses to be especially serious, we decline to adopt the board’s recommendation regarding sanctions. … Pfeifer, J., dissents and would adopt the recommendation of the board of a one-year suspension.

Hybud Equip. Corp. v. Sphere Drake Ins.

62 Ohio St. 3d 1507 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1992

Ill and V. Motions overruled. Moyer, C.J., and H. Brown, J., would grant the motion to strike reply brief. Resnick, J., would grant the motion to strike cross-appellant’s Propositions of Law Nos. Ill and V.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Connors

89 Ohio St. 3d 370 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2000

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. CONNORS. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Connors, 2000-Ohio-165.] … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Connors (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1432, 680 N.E.2d 1008.

Shook v. Mahoning Valley Sanitary District

120 Ohio St. 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1929

Bryant, v. Akron Metropolitan Park Dist., and State, ex rel. Wadsworth, v. Zangerle, Auditor, post, 464, 166 N. E., 407 , this day decided by this court. … In addition to what is stated in that opinion, State Board of *458 Health v. Greenville, 86 Ohio St., 1 , 98 N. E., 1019 , Ann. Cas., 1913D, 52, is a cogent authority.

State v. Zimmerman

18 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1985

United States v. Hasting (1983), 461 U.S. 499 ; cf. State v. Smith (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 13 . … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur.

Robb v. Chagrin Lagoons Yacht Club, Inc.

75 Ohio St. 3d 264 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1996

After the hearing, the board makes a recommendation which is voted upon by the voting members at a meeting. … II Malicious Prosecution In Crawford v. Euclid Natl.

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Brooks

169 Ohio St. 3d 371 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2022

V(13)(B)(3) through (6). … V(13)(C)(5). But those factors, the board noted, did not outweigh the fact that he had continued practicing law despite “full knowledge of this disciplinary proceeding.”