Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Broschak

118 Ohio St. 3d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 15, 2008

Respondent did not respond to the inquiries. {¶ 28} As to Count V, the board found violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(l), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-101(A)(3). *241 Count VI — Joshua Smith … I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII; 1-104(A) and (B) with respect to Count I; 6-101(A)(3) with respect to Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII; 7-101(A)(l) with respect to Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII; 7-

State ex rel. Culgan v. Collier

132 Ohio St. 3d 394 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 2012

Culgan v. Collier, 132 Ohio St.3d 394, 2012-Ohio-2916.] THE STATE EX REL. CULGAN, APPELLANT, v. COLLIER, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Culgan v. Collier, 132 Ohio St.3d 394, 2012-Ohio-2916.] … Hudson v.

In re Ruffin

143 Ohio St. 3d 1215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2014

V(5)(A), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child-support order by Sean P. … V(8)(G)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board of

State Ex Rel. Bruml v. Village of Brooklyn

126 Ohio St. 459 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1933

Bowman, v. Board of Commrs. of Allen County, 124 Ohio St., 174 , at page 202, 177 N. … Ra be et al. v. Board of Education, 88 Ohio St., 403 , approved and followed.”

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kennedy

95 Ohio St. 3d 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2002

LORAIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. KENNEDY. [Cite as Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kennedy, 2002-Ohio-1943.] … Based upon our holding in Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23, 1 O.O. 313, 193 N.E. 650, we said in Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Hawkins v. Pickaway Cty. Bd. of Elections

75 Ohio St. 3d 275 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1996

HAWKINS v. PICKAWAY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Hawkins v. Pickaway Cty. … Herman v.

Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 651 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1996

MELLON BANK, NA, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-229.] … Gorry, Assistant County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Franklin County Auditor and Franklin County Board of Revision. Baker & Hostetler and George H.

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Bunce

81 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1998

We adopt the board’s findings and conclusion that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3). Clearly, respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him by his client. … See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Shaman (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 196, 201 , 685 N.E.2d 518, 521 , citing Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Boychuk (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 93, 97 , 679 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 .

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Smith

96 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2002

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. SMITH ET AL. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Smith, 2002-Ohio-3607.] … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Telford (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 111, 112, 707 N.E.2d 462.

Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli

96 Ohio St. 3d 424 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 2002

In Toledo Bar Assn. v. … In Dayton Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. White Consolidated Industries v. Industrial Commission

48 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1990

Rockwell Internatl., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 44 , 531 N.E. 2d 678 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Jenkins v. Billy

43 Ohio St. 3d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 1989

Bland v. Holden (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 238, 239 , 50 O.O. 2d 477, 257 N.E. 2d 397, 398 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State v. Waller

47 Ohio St. 2d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1976

Subsequently, in State v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Stern, J. In State v. Mitchell (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 447 , and State v.

State ex rel. Hadlock v. McMackin

61 Ohio St. 3d 433 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1991

Justice, v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

In Re Frinzl

152 Ohio St. 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1949

care and custody of” the board. … Lewis v. Reed, 117 Ohio St., 152 , 157 N. E., 897 , cited by the majority, is clearly distinguishable from this case. In the Lewis case there had been no order for temporary custody.

Nestor v. Nestor

15 Ohio St. 3d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Carmichael v. State (1861), 12 Ohio St. 553 ; Lawrence RR. Co. v. Cobb (1878), 35 Ohio St. 94 ; Ives v. McNicoll (1899), 59 Ohio St. 402 ; Umbenhower v. Labus (1912), 85 Ohio St. 238 ; Markley v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown and Locher, JJ., dissent. See 52 American Jurisprudence 2d (1970) 900, Marriage, Section 44. See Gatterdam v. Gatterdam (1949), 86 Ohio App. 29 [ 39 O.O. 347 ],

Harmath v. Goler

49 Ohio St. 3d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1990

This cause is affirmed on authority of Johnson v. University Hospitals of Cleveland (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 49 , 540 N.E. 2d 1370 . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. … Brown, J., dissents.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Patterson

95 Ohio St. 3d 502 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2002

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. PATTERSON. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Patterson, 2002-Ohio-2487.] … See Columbus Bar Assn. v. Patterson (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 23, 711 N.E.2d 221.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Clark

76 Ohio St. 3d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1996

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Clark, 1996-Ohio-385.] … V(4)(G) (failing to cooperate during an investigation).

Kennedy v. W. Res. Senior Care

177 Ohio St. 3d 403 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2024

See Wyoming v. Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437, 454 (1992). The United States Supreme Court previously announced a two-tiered approach to analyzing dormant Commerce Clause challenges. See Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. … See, e.g., Brown-Forman at 579, (“[T]here is no clear line separating the category of state regulation that is virtually per se invalid under the Commerce Clause, and the category subject to the Pike v.