Case law

Boles v. Knab

129 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2011

[Cite as Boles v. Knab, 129 Ohio St.3d 222, 2011-Ohio-2859.] BOLES, APPELLANT, v. KNAB, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Boles v. Knab, 129 Ohio St.3d 222, 2011-Ohio-2859.] … See Cleveland v.

State ex rel. Demaline v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

90 Ohio St. 3d 523 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2000

Landis v. Morrow Cty. … Ascani v. Stark Cty.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawlor

92 Ohio St. 3d 406 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2001

Respondent answered, and the matter was referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). … Since Union Savings Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Alsfelder

103 Ohio St. 3d 375 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2004

See PNC Bank, Ohio, N.A. v. … Relator insists that misconduct of this magnitude must be censured with at least the six-month actual suspension recommended by the board. See, e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Meyer

95 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2002

V(4)(G). According to Count Three, Pirucki also engaged respondent to represent him in a divorce action in 1998. … On review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and agree that an indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction.

State v. Helms

128 Ohio St. 3d 352 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2011

[Cite as State v. Helms, 128 Ohio St.3d 352, 2011-Ohio-738.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. HELMS, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., concurs but would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

In re Jones

62 Ohio St. 3d 1429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1991

V(9)(a)(iii), Ralph Jones, Registration No. 0029158, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Akron Bar Assn. v. Williams

1996 Ohio 327 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1996

1 Akron Bar Association v. Williams. 2 [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. … The matter was considered by a 4 panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the 5 Supreme Court (“board”) upon the pleadings and agreed stipulations. 6 According to the stipulated

State ex rel. Abex Corp. v. Industrial Commission

74 Ohio St. 3d 125 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1995

Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18 , 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E.2d 936 . … Fultz v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 327 , 631 N.E.2d 1057 .

State ex rel. Rankin v. State

2025 Ohio 4483 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2025

Casey v. Brown, 2023- Ohio-2264, ¶ 15. … Boylen v. Harmon, 2006-Ohio-7, ¶ 6, quoting State ex rel. Evans v. Columbus Dept. of Law, 1998-Ohio-128, ¶ 5.

State ex rel. Grinnell v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

62 Ohio St. 3d 1476 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1991

Brown, JJ., dissent. 91-1153. Newbold v. Keller. In Mandamus. On motion to consolidate with 91-1750, Newbold v. Keller, motion for leave to file evidence instanter, and motion for leave to file supplemental pleadings.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

94 Ohio St. 3d 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2002

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 2002-Ohio-1240.] … Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 113, 729 N.E.2d 343.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Johnson

81 Ohio St. 3d 74 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1998

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. JOHNSON. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Johnson, 1998-Ohio-645.] … The matter came before a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”), which found that the respondent was provided with adequate notice of the proceedings and an opportunity

State Ex Rel. Bryd v. Sherwood

140 Ohio St. 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1942

Bd. of Trustees of Madison County Children’s Home v. State, ex rel. Laird, 128 Ohio St., 560 , 192 N. E., 877 . … Davis et al., Civil Service Comm., v. State, ex rel. Kennedy, Dir., 127 Ohio St., 261 , 187 N. E., 867 ; Verberg v. Board of Edn. of City School Dist. of Cleveland, 135 Ohio St., 246 , 20 N. E. (2d), 368.

Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1996

MIDDLETON, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-97.] … Armstrong and Victor V. Anselmo, for appellee Cleveland Board of Education in case Nos. 94-2399 and 95- 300. Kelly, McCann & Livingstone and Robert A.

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

126 Ohio St. 3d 506 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 6, 2010

Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 126 Ohio St.3d 506, 2010-Ohio-4727.] THE STATE EX REL. MARTIN, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mesi

72 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1995

We concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 5-105(B), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(A) and (B). The board’s recommended sanction, however, is not appropriate. … V(5). Restitution remains a condition for respondent’s reinstatement by operation of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(E)(1). Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick, F.E.

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Hennessey (Slip Opinion)

164 Ohio St. 3d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2021

Co. v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc., 27 Ohio St.3d 31, 34, 501 N.E.2d 617 (1986); Greenspan v. Third Fed. S. & L. … Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Becker v. Shaull

62 Ohio St. 3d 480 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992

. * * * ” Swoboda v. Brown (1935), 129 Ohio St. 512, 522 , 2 O.O. 516, 521 , 196 N.E. 274, 278 . … In Eisenhuth v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Daniell

176 Ohio St. 3d 1201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2024

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Daniell, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2024-Ohio-1422.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DANIELL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Ric Daniell, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.