Case law

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Bunce

81 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1998

We adopt the board’s findings and conclusion that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3). Clearly, respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him by his client. … See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Shaman (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 196, 201 , 685 N.E.2d 518, 521 , citing Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Boychuk (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 93, 97 , 679 N.E.2d 1081, 1084 .

S. S. Kresge Co. v. Bowers

2 Ohio St. 2d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1965

Kresge Co. v. … Hence, the decision of the board is affirmed.” In other words, the precise holding in the case of Kresge v.

Good Samaritan Hospital of Dayton v. Porterfield

29 Ohio St. 2d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1972

See, also, Cleveland v. … Board of Tax Appeals (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 255, 258 . We also recognize that R. C. 5739.02(B) (12) “defines ‘charitable purposes’ far more explicitly” than does R. C. 5709.12. Ohio Children’s Society v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas

91 Ohio St. 3d 86 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2001

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KLAAS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas, 2001-Ohio-276.] … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. DeTorio v. Industrial Commission

135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1939

City of Elyria v. Vandemark, 100 Ohio St., 365 , 371, 372, 126 N. E., 314 . … If the Legislature has the power to create additional boards clothed with power to hear and finally determine claims', there is no denying its power to multiply such boards at will even to the creation of one such board for

Disciplinary Counsel v. Detty

96 Ohio St. 3d 57 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2002

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DETTY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Detty, 2002-Ohio-2992.] … review we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.

State ex rel. Dix v. Angelotta

18 Ohio St. 3d 115 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1985

Woodbury, v. Spitler (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 134 [ 63 O.O.2d 229 ], syllabus. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. R.C. 2945.71(C)(2) mandates that a person charged with a felony shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy days after his arrest.

State Emp. Relations Bd. v. Adena Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

1993 Ohio 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1993

State Employment Relations Board, Appellee; Kelley, Appellant, v. Adena Local School District Board of Education, Appellee. [Cite as State Emp. Relations Bd. v. Adena Local School Dist. … Labor Relations Bd. v.

City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

10 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1984

See Columbus v. Pub. Util. … Brown, Ford, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Hennessey (Slip Opinion)

164 Ohio St. 3d 437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2021

Co. v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc., 27 Ohio St.3d 31, 34, 501 N.E.2d 617 (1986); Greenspan v. Third Fed. S. & L. … Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Yajko

77 Ohio St. 3d 385 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1997

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. YAJKO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Yajko, 1997-Ohio-263.] … At minimum, that is at least a twenty-five percent raise over a two-year period. {¶ 12} In Disciplinary Counsel v.

Jones v. Commissioners

57 Ohio St. (N.S.) 189 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1897

In the case of Lewis et al. v. … Cricket v. The State, supra.

Boles v. Knab

130 Ohio St. 3d 339 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2011

[Cite as Boles v. Knab, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049.] BOLES, APPELLANT, v. KNAB, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Boles v. Knab, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049.] … See Tisdale v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 201, 2007- Ohio-3833, 870 N.E.2d 1191, ¶ 7 (“a claimed violation of a right to a speedy trial is not cognizable in habeas corpus”); Smith v.

Koons v. State

36 Ohio St. (N.S.) 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

Bragg v. Colwell, 19 Ohio St. 407 ; Pavey v. Pavey, 30 Ohio St. 600 . … Brown ; that he had never seen the defendant write, nor had he seen the signature of C. S. Koons until now, nor had he seen the alleged forged check since March 31.

Petrey v. Simon

4 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1983

R. 56(C); Temple v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and W. Brown, J., dissent. J.P. Celebrezze, J., not participating. Our holding today coincides with those of most of the federal circuit courts of appeals. See, e.g., Gould, Inc. v.

Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

73 Ohio St. 3d 715 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1995

Co. v. … Co. v.

State v. Kilby

50 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1977

Brown, J. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. R.

Morris v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.

14 Ohio St. 3d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1984

Brown, J. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

State v. Hunt

47 Ohio St. 2d 170 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1976

Miller v. Aderhold (1933), 288 U. S. 206 ; Berman v. United States (1937), 302 U. S. 211 ; State v. Chamberlain (1964), 177 Ohio St. 104 , 202 N. E. 2d 695 ; Columbus v. Stires (1967), 9 Ohio App. 2d 315 , 224 N. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. “‘If the court or jury finds, upon the hearing provided for in Section 2945.37 of the Revised Code, that the accused is sane, he shall be proceeded against as provided by law.

In Re Frinzl

152 Ohio St. 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1949

care and custody of” the board. … Lewis v. Reed, 117 Ohio St., 152 , 157 N. E., 897 , cited by the majority, is clearly distinguishable from this case. In the Lewis case there had been no order for temporary custody.