Case law

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury

80 Ohio St. 3d 1204 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1997

V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the cost of publication. For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v.

Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. Zangerle

153 Ohio St. 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1950

See Benjamin Rose Institute v. Myers, Treas., 92 Ohio St., 252 , 110 N. E., 924 , L. R. A. 1916D, 1170; Incorporated Trustees of Gospel Workers Society v. Evatt, Tax Commr., supra; Burns v. … Board of Tax Appeals, 150 Ohio St., 219, 223 , 80 N. E. (2d), 761, 763.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Stewart

116 Ohio St. 3d 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2007

Accord Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Verne, 99 Ohio St.3d 50 , 2003-Ohio-2463 , 788 N.E.2d 1064 , ¶ 4; Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Wyandt & Silvers, Inc., 107 Ohio St.3d 259 , 2005-Ohio-6430 , 838 N.E.2d 655, ¶ 11-12 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Allen

94 Ohio St. 3d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 2002

See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F)(1).

State v. Muscatello

55 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1978

E. g., State v. Robinson (1954), 161 Ohio St. 213 , 219, 118 N. E. 2d 517 . See, also, State v. Elfrink (1954), 161 Ohio St. 549 , 550-52, 120 N. E. 2d 83 . … Brown, P. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Looker, J., concurs in the judgment. R.

Richardson v. Mehan

69 Ohio St. 2d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1982

The trial court correctly stated the basic test for determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor as found in Gillum v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and C. Brown, J., dissent.

City of Lima v. Ward

10 Ohio St. 2d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1967

Cincinnati v. Schill, 125 Ohio St. 57 . The motion to certify the record is allowed, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Judgment reversed. Taut, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Blake

100 Ohio St. 3d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2003

V(6)(F). … The board adopted the master commissioner’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).

Westhaven, Inc. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1998

WESTHAVEN, INC., APPELLEE, v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Westhaven, Inc. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-446.] … Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.

Soc. Natl. Bank v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 401 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1998

SOCIETY NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT, v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Soc. Natl. Bank v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-436.] … Restaurant & Lunch Co. v.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Spector

121 Ohio St. 3d 271 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2009

Bar Assn. v. Spector, 121 Ohio St.3d 271, 2009-Ohio-1155.] CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. SPECTOR. [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F). A master commissioner appointed by the board granted the motion, making findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommending the indefinite suspension.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dicker

102 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004

V(4)(G). {¶ 5} In recommending a sanction, the panel considered the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in BCGD Proc.Reg. Section 10. … The board accepted the parties’ agreement, adopting the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and recommendation.

State ex rel. Hart v. Industrial Commission

68 Ohio St. 3d 506 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1994

Brown v. Indus. Comm. (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 45 , 623 N.E.2d 55 , the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. Judgment reversed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Karb v. State

54 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1896

act — pensioning firemen — is of a general nature, and it seems to be so, it is difficult to maintain the constitutionality of the act, in view of the recent decision of this court in the ease of the City of Cincinnati v. … Failure of the board to act, would not supply the place of favorable action by the board, because upon acting on the application, the board might find and determine that the alleged disability was not “ caused in, or induced

Farmers Dairy Foods, Inc. v. Zaino

98 Ohio St. 3d 1507 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2003

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-R-167. Sua sponte, cause consolidated for argument and decision with 2002-1261, Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc. v. … Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 01-M-378, and 2002-1685, Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc. v. Zaino, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-P-366.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Sayler

97 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2002

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. SAYLER. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Sayler, 2002-Ohio-5936.] … The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, John L.

C.K. & J.K., Inc. v. Fairview Shopping Center Corp.

63 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

Goldberg v. Tri-States Theatre Corp. (C.A. 8, 1942), 126 F. 2d 26 ; Marvin County Bd. of Realtors v. Palsson (1976), 16 Cal. 3d 920 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 1 ; Pensacola Associates v. Biggs Sporting Goods (Fla. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Although appellant contends that price fixing is involved, a review of the record indicates that no evidence was presented sufficient to prove such a claim.

DeCastro v. Wellston City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

94 Ohio St. 3d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2002

DECASTRO, APPELLEE, v. WELLSTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as DeCastro v. Wellston City School Dist. … California Teachers Assn. v.

State ex rel. Rice v. McGrath

62 Ohio St. 3d 70 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1991

Moreover, under Manrow v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Kenton Structural & Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

91 Ohio St. 3d 411 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2001

Products, Inc. v. … Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 162, 524 N.E.2d 482. It does not apply where the employee simply makes a mistake that results in injury. {¶ 27} In State ex rel. Cotterman v. St.