Case law

Richardson v. Mehan

69 Ohio St. 2d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1982

The trial court correctly stated the basic test for determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor as found in Gillum v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and C. Brown, J., dissent.

City of Lima v. Ward

10 Ohio St. 2d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1967

Cincinnati v. Schill, 125 Ohio St. 57 . The motion to certify the record is allowed, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Judgment reversed. Taut, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Blake

100 Ohio St. 3d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2003

V(6)(F). … The board adopted the master commissioner’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).

Westhaven, Inc. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1998

WESTHAVEN, INC., APPELLEE, v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Westhaven, Inc. v. Wood Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-446.] … Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dicker

102 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004

V(4)(G). {¶ 5} In recommending a sanction, the panel considered the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in BCGD Proc.Reg. Section 10. … The board accepted the parties’ agreement, adopting the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and recommendation.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dice

120 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2008

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dice, 120 Ohio St.3d 455, 2008-Ohio-6787.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. DICE. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dice, 120 Ohio St.3d 455, 2008-Ohio-6787.] … A panel of the board issued a report accepting the stipulations and the parties’ proposed sanction, which the board adopted.

MacDonald v. Bernard

1 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1982

See Steffen v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Krupansky, J., dissents.

Karb v. State

54 Ohio St. (N.S.) 383 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1896

act — pensioning firemen — is of a general nature, and it seems to be so, it is difficult to maintain the constitutionality of the act, in view of the recent decision of this court in the ease of the City of Cincinnati v. … Failure of the board to act, would not supply the place of favorable action by the board, because upon acting on the application, the board might find and determine that the alleged disability was not “ caused in, or induced

State ex rel. Leis v. Kraft

10 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1984

Leis, v. Kraft is affirmed. The judgment in State v. Johnson is reversed. Judgment affirmed in case No. 83-76. Judgment reversed in case No. 83-82. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. … Brown, JJ., concur. Specifically, the court relied upon Evid.

Moss v. Olson

148 Ohio St. 625 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1947

While the exact question presented is new in this state, the case of Lowe v. Brown, 22 Ohio St., 463 , is analogous in principle. … In the case of Kaufmann v.

Schick v. City of Cincinnati

116 Ohio St. 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1927

Louis County Court v. Sparks, 10 Mo., 117 , 45 Am. Dec., 355 ; People ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Solano County v. Board of Supervisors of Lake County, 33 Cal., 487 ; Duncan v. Cox, 41 Ind. App., 61 , 81 N. … E., 125 ; Blimm v. Commonwealth, 70 Ky., (7 Bush), 320; Pond v. Negus, 3 Mass., 230 , 3 Am. Dec., 131 ; Rambeck v. La Bree, Sheriff, 156 Minn., 310 , 194 N. W., 643 ; East Bay Municipal Utility District v.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Sayler

97 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2002

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. SAYLER. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Sayler, 2002-Ohio-5936.] … The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, John L.

C.K. & J.K., Inc. v. Fairview Shopping Center Corp.

63 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

Goldberg v. Tri-States Theatre Corp. (C.A. 8, 1942), 126 F. 2d 26 ; Marvin County Bd. of Realtors v. Palsson (1976), 16 Cal. 3d 920 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 1 ; Pensacola Associates v. Biggs Sporting Goods (Fla. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Although appellant contends that price fixing is involved, a review of the record indicates that no evidence was presented sufficient to prove such a claim.

C. F. Kettering, Inc. v. Evatt

144 Ohio St. 419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1945

the amount or value of intangible property * * * owned or used in this state by * * * a *423 * * * foreign corporation the commission shall be guided by the provisions of Section 5328-1 and 5328-2 of the General Code * ’* V’ … The interpretation of the facts and the application of the law thereto as made by the Board of Tax Appeals may in our opinion be sustained, with one exception.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

146 Ohio St. 3d 209 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 2016

V(16). … . {¶ 10} The panel and board found that the consent-to-discipline agreement conforms to Gov.Bar R. V(16) and recommend that we adopt the agreement in its entirety.

Hazel v. Knab

130 Ohio St. 3d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 15, 2011

See Goins v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Corey Hazel, pro se.

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

69 Ohio St. 2d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1982

Co. v. Public Util. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in the syllabus and judgment on the basis of Cleveland v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 62 .

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Hooks

141 Ohio St. 3d 1237 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2014

[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Hooks, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5238.] DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. HOOKS. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Hooks, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5238.] … Respondent has not paid board costs as ordered by the court.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pizzedaz

1994 Ohio 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1994

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pizzedaz. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pizzedaz (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … V(9)(a)(iii) (now Gov.Bar R. V[5][A][3]). Douglas, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Hickman

113 Ohio St. 3d 164 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 2007

Toledo Bar Assn. v. … The board adopted the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction.