Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • Dorian v. Euclid Board of Education

    62 Ohio St. 2d 182 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1980

    Bd. of Regents v. Roth (1972), 408 U. S. 564 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Federal Paper Board Co. v. Kosydar

    37 Ohio St. 2d 28 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1974

    Appellant presents two propositions of law challenging the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Braden v. Cleveland Board of Education

    87 Ohio St. 3d 206 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1999

    Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 451 , 715 N.E.2d 1062 . Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur separately.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 788 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waymire v. Board of Education

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 842 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. Board of Education

    1 Ohio Law. Abs. 813 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. Board of Education

    5 Ohio Law. Abs. 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1927

    Where such expenditures are made by a board of education of a city, the primary official duty and responsibility rests upon the city solicitor or director of law, and a failure to discharge that duty and a failure by him

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 275 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Board of Trustees

    83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 466 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1910

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Minor

    23 Ohio St. (N.S.) 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1872

    On the other hand, if the second resolution is also suppressed, all discretion of the board will be taken away, the rule for morning exercises will be made perpetual, and any board, or member of a board, who should hereafter … They are the same, so far as applicable, enunciated by this court in Bloom v. Richards, 2 Ohio St. 387 , and in McGatrick v. Wason, 4 Ib. 566. They are as old as Madison, and were his favorite opinions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weisheimer v. Board of Agriculture

    101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 523 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1920

    Judgment affirmed on authority of Saviers v. Smith, Secretary of State, ante, 132, and Castle v. Mason, 91 Ohio St., 296 . Judgment affirmed. Nichols, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Putnam v. Board of Commissioners

    102 Ohio St. (N.S.) 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1921

    Co. v. Kelly, 24 Ohio St., 345 ; Yocum, Admr., v. Allen, 58 Ohio St., 280 , and Union Ins. Co. v. McGookey & Moore, 33 Ohio St., 555 . In Dayton Ins. Co. v. … This provision required an affirmative act on behalf of the board before the contractor could proceed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nesmith v. State Medical Board

    107 Ohio St. (N.S.) 627 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1923

    It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed upon the authority of Rutledge v. State Medical Board, 106 Ohio St., 544 , 140 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kell v. Board of Commissioners

    77 Ohio St. (N.S.) 635 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Welbourn

    78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dworken v. Board of Education

    156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 346 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Board of Education

    65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 586 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1901

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roose v. Board of Revision

    161 Ohio St. (N.S.) 522 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1954

    Curry et al., Bd. of County Commrs., v. Monroe, Treas., 159 Ohio St., 1 , 110 N. … The other issues presented by appellants on this appeal are substantially the same as those decided adversely to similar contentions which they made in Roose, Trustee, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoshor v. Board of Commissioners

    84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 503 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Review

    165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 526 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1956

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.