Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.56s
139 Ohio St. 3d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 11, 2014
Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren, 115 Ohio St.3d 473, 2007-Ohio-5251, 875 N.E.2d 935, ¶ 21. {¶ 12} The board found that no aggravating factors were present. … Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Turner
141 Ohio St. 3d 1235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2014
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5222.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TURNER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5222.] … Respondent has not paid board costs as ordered by the court.
Cited 0 timesPublished124 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2009
State v. … Woods v.
Overruled on other grounds by State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St. 3d 92 (2010)Cited 323 timesPublishedLincoln Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Warren
13 Ohio St. 2d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1968
The Board of Tax Appeals denied the application. … The same position was taken in Jones v. Conn, 116 Ohio St. 1, 14 , 155 N. E. 791, 795 .
Cited 10 timesPublished55 Ohio St. 2d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1978
Ker v. California (1963), 374 U. S. 23 ; Harris v. United States (1968), 390 U. S. 234 . … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Herbert and Locher, JJ., concur in paragraph two. the syllabus. of P. Brown, J., dissents.
Cited 116 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brady v. Industrial Commission
28 Ohio St. 3d 241 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1986
See, *243 e.g., Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co. (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 147, 149-150 (Clifford F. Brown, J., concurring). My position remains unchanged. … Norman, v. Indus.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Weithman
144 Ohio St. 3d 1255 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2015
Respondent has not paid board costs as ordered by the court. … V(23)(C). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(23), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Ohio St. 2d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1977
In State v. … Brown, P. BROwn, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
Vacated on other grounds by Jordan v. Arizona, 438 U.S. 911 (1978)Cited 39 timesPublished53 Ohio St. 3d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1990
This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Knox County in Beck v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
Cited 9 timesPublished88 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2000
AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BOJONELL. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Bojonell, 2000-Ohio-287.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was submitted to the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”) on stipulated facts. {¶ 2} The board found the following facts.
Cited 1 timesPublished74 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1995
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ESTEP. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep, 1995-Ohio-258.] … Green v. Huntington Natl.
Cited 0 timesPublished49 Ohio St. 2d 198 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1977
Jurek v. Texas, supra ( 49 L. Ed. 929 ), at page 941. Futhermore, as pointed out in State v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., dissent.
Vacated on other grounds by Jordan v. Arizona, 438 U.S. 911 (1978)Cited 24 timesPublishedRichland County Bar Ass'n v. Clapp
84 Ohio St. 3d 276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1998
Akron Bar Assn. v. Greene (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 279, 280 , 673 N.E.2d 1307, 1308 . … Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23 , 1 O.O. 313 , 193 N.E. 650 , paragraph one of the syllabus; see, also, Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedCleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Parrish
121 Ohio St. 3d 610 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 2009
Bar Assn. v. Parrish, 121 Ohio St.3d 610, 2009-Ohio-1969.] CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. PARRISH. [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. … V(5)(A)(4).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Randolph
85 Ohio St. 3d 325 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1999
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and x-ecommendation of the board. A public reprimand is the appropiiate sanction for respondent’s isolated act of misconduct. See Akron Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Gilmartin (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 10 , 577 N.E.2d 350 , where we publicly reprimanded and ordered attorneys to make full restitution to clients for violating DR 2-106(A).
Cited 6 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Assn. v. McBeth
139 Ohio St. 3d 175 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 2014
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. McBeth, 139 Ohio St.3d 175, 2014-Ohio-1611.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MCBETH. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … A panel of the board subsequently considered the cause on the parties’ revised consent-to-discipline agreement.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeary v. Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc.
2012 Ohio 5626 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2012
[Cite as Beary v. Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 359, 2012-Ohio-5626.] BEARY, APPELLANT, v. LARRY MURPHY DUMP TRUCK SERVICE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES, ET AL. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Young & Sucher, P.L.L., and Daniel M.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of Shaker Heights v. Zangerle
148 Ohio St. 361 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1947
Counsel for appellant in his brief *Page 363 insists that this court reconsider the case of Zangerle, Aud. , v. … Methodist Book Concern , v. Guckenberger, Aud. , and Zangerle, Aud. , v. City of Cleveland, supra , and the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is in the present proceedings, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublished141 Ohio St. 3d 1403 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2014
This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness of its final report. … Upon consideration of applicant’s motion to strike and replace pleading of applicant Joseph V. Libretti Jr., it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. The copy of applicant Joseph V.
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Ohio St. 108 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1840
Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 ; Comm’rs Gallia Co. v. Holcomb, 7 Ohio, 232, pt. 2. … The agreed case shows there had been no full compliance with this provision, but a board on the west side of the river, and at the west end of the bridge only.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna