Case law

State ex rel. Pointer v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

170 Ohio St. 3d 96 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2022

The list reads as follows: (1) Pointer v. Jane Doe Smith et al., Case No. 20APE-12-555 (2) Pointer v. Jane Doe Smith et al., Case No. 20CV003737 (3) Pointer v. … White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5; see also State ex rel. Young v.

C.K. & J.K., Inc. v. Fairview Shopping Center Corp.

63 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

Goldberg v. Tri-States Theatre Corp. (C.A. 8, 1942), 126 F. 2d 26 ; Marvin County Bd. of Realtors v. Palsson (1976), 16 Cal. 3d 920 , 130 Cal. Rptr. 1 ; Pensacola Associates v. Biggs Sporting Goods (Fla. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Although appellant contends that price fixing is involved, a review of the record indicates that no evidence was presented sufficient to prove such a claim.

State v. Lampkin

2011 Ohio 5715 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2011

[Cite as State v. Lampkin, 130 Ohio St.3d 270, 2011-Ohio-5715.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LAMPKIN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Lampkin, 130 Ohio St.3d 270, 2011-Ohio-5715.] … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., dissents. __________________ Julia R.

Fortune v. Reshetylo

33 Ohio St. 2d 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1973

As stated in Harley v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Aramark Corp. v. Harris

2025 Ohio 2114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2025

Maxcy v. … Thomas v.

Richardson v. Mehan

69 Ohio St. 2d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1982

The trial court correctly stated the basic test for determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor as found in Gillum v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and C. Brown, J., dissent.

Dayton Rental Co. v. Evatt

145 Ohio St. 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1945

Section 5546-9a, General Code, provides that a vendor or consumer may appeal to the *217 Board of Tax Appeals “in the same timé, manner and form as that provided in Section 5611 of the General Code of Ohio.” … In the instant case, as stated in the per curiam opinion in Kinsman Square Drug Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., ante, 52, at page 54, 60 N.

In re Horvath

42 Ohio St. 2d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1975

In Burton v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. At Ms competency hearing, Jackson was represented by .counsel who cross-examined the testifying doctors and called witnesses.

State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Rose

61 Ohio St. 3d 528 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1991

Brown, in his concurring opinion in Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. … Thus, we further limit the holding in Wood v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner

141 Ohio St. 3d 1235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2014

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5222.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TURNER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Turner, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2014-Ohio-5222.] … Respondent has not paid board costs as ordered by the court.

State v. Singleton

124 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2009

State v. … Woods v.

Lincoln Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Warren

13 Ohio St. 2d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1968

The Board of Tax Appeals denied the application. … The same position was taken in Jones v. Conn, 116 Ohio St. 1, 14 , 155 N. E. 791, 795 .

State v. Williams

55 Ohio St. 2d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1978

Ker v. California (1963), 374 U. S. 23 ; Harris v. United States (1968), 390 U. S. 234 . … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Herbert and Locher, JJ., concur in paragraph two. the syllabus. of P. Brown, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Weithman

144 Ohio St. 3d 1255 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2015

Respondent has not paid board costs as ordered by the court. … V(23)(C). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(23), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R.

State ex rel. Brady v. Industrial Commission

28 Ohio St. 3d 241 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1986

See, *243 e.g., Meeks v. Ohio Brass Co. (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 147, 149-150 (Clifford F. Brown, J., concurring). My position remains unchanged. … Norman, v. Indus.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Stewart

116 Ohio St. 3d 289 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2007

Accord Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Verne, 99 Ohio St.3d 50 , 2003-Ohio-2463 , 788 N.E.2d 1064 , ¶ 4; Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Wyandt & Silvers, Inc., 107 Ohio St.3d 259 , 2005-Ohio-6430 , 838 N.E.2d 655, ¶ 11-12 .

State ex rel. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weaver

1993 Ohio 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1993

Lake County Board of Commissioners, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Weaver, Judge, et al., Appellees and Cross-Appellants. [Cite as State ex rel. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weaver (1993), Ohio St.3d .] … Bd. of Commrs. v.

State v. Weind

50 Ohio St. 2d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1977

In State v. … Brown, P. BROwn, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Commissioners of Geauga County v. Ranney

13 Ohio St. 388 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1862

In the former view, the board of county commissioners was the tribunal, in the first instance, to act upon the justice and amount of the claim, and an appeal to the court of common pleas might be properly taken. … The case of Cooper v. Armstrong, 19 Ohio Rep. 116 , ca.n be sustained only, on the same principle.

State ex rel. Krumm v. Industrial Commission

28 Ohio St. 3d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1986

Rouch, v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co. (1986), 26 Ohio St. 3d 197 . Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and C. Brown, J., separately dissent.