Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.86s
West Bay Manor Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
73 Ohio St. 3d 568 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995
WEST BAY MANOR COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.; WESTLAKE BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as West Bay Manor Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bozanich
95 Ohio St. 3d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2002
Respondent answered, and the matter was referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). … V(4)(G) (no attorney shall neglect or refuse to assist or testify *111 in an investigation or hearing).
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Radel
57 Ohio St. 3d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1991
Hughes, v. Brown (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 41 , 60 O.O. 2d 23, 285 N.E. 2d 376 ; State, ex rel. Cleveland Hts., v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 47 , 553 N.E. 2d 249 ; State, ex rel. Beck, v. … Brown, JJ., concur. *105 Wright, J., concurs in judgment only. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
Cited 10 timesPublishedOhio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission
46 Ohio St. 2d 214 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1976
Brown, J. The determinative question presented is whether the Public Utilities Commission may authorize a public utility to levy a monetary penalty against its consumers. … Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents. R.
Cited 1 timesPublished79 Ohio St. 3d 211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1997
Brown v. Court of Common Pleas of Coshocton Cty. (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 46 , 23 OBR 122, 491 N.E.2d 303 . … Carrion v. Harris (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 19, 19-20 , 530 N.E.2d 1330, 1330-1331 .
Cited 22 timesPublished98 Ohio St. 3d 444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2003
V(11)(B). … V(10). The board adopted the master commissioner’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. David F. Cooper and Mark S.
Cited 7 timesPublished130 Ohio St. 3d 400 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 23, 2011
Rankin v. Mohr, 130 Ohio St.3d 400, 2011-Ohio-5934.] THE STATE EX REL. RANKIN, APPELLANT, v. MOHR, DIR., APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Rankin v. Mohr, 130 Ohio St.3d 400, 2011-Ohio-5934.] … See generally State v. Parsley, Franklin App. No. 01AP-612, 2010- Ohio-1689, 2010 WL 1510197, ¶ 48-50. Our holding in State v.
Cited 11 timesPublished57 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1991
This cause is affirmed on authority of Trussell v. General Motors Corp. (1990), 53 Ohio St. 3d 142 , 559 N.E. 2d 732 . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished100 Ohio St. 3d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2003
V(6)(F). … The board adopted the master commissioner’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).
Cited 5 timesPublishedMcClain v. Northwest Community Corr. Ctr., Judicial Corr. Bd.
95 Ohio St. 3d 484 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 2002
MCCLAIN v. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER, JUDICIAL CORRECTIONS BOARD, ET AL. [Cite as McClain v. Northwest Community Corr. Ctr., Judicial Corr. … See State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Ohio St. 3d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1984
State v. Price (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 136 [ 14 O.O.3d 379 ], paragraph two of the syllabus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents.
Cited 10 timesPublished39 Ohio St. 3d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1988
Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 136 , 30 O.O. 2d 487, 205 N.E. 2d 394 ; Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4 , 33 O.O. 2d 2, 210 N.E. 2d 885 . … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished30 Ohio St. 2d 196 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1972
Co. v. Wetmore, supra. … J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 59 timesPublished102 Ohio St. 3d 123 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004
V(4)(G). {¶ 5} In recommending a sanction, the panel considered the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in BCGD Proc.Reg. Section 10. … The board accepted the parties’ agreement, adopting the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and recommendation.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSecurity Mutual Casualty Co. v. Hoff
54 Ohio St. 2d 426 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1978
West v. McNamara (1953), 159 Ohio St. 187 (at 193, words in parenthesis added). *429 “The trial court, however, must consider whether the general rule is affected by the two additional factors of this ease. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., conc ur. W. Brown, J., concurs in the judgment.
Cited 11 timesPublished45 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1887
Ye find much aid, however, in the solution of this question in the case of McKnight v. United States, 13 Court of Claims, 299, 305. … The comptroller is not required to look or inquire, back of the order of payment issued by the board, into the account or bill presented by the claimant to such board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Application of Notestine
2025 Ohio 2415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 8, 2025
Notestine submitted with her NCBE questionnaire a certified copy of the hearing examiner’s report, excerpts from the minutes of the board meeting, and the board’s order. 6 … Co. v. J.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeneral Data Corp. v. Porterfield
21 Ohio St. 2d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1970
See Alside v. Bowers, 174 Ohio St. 463 . … See Jewel Companies, Inc., v. Porterfield, 21 Ohio St. 2d 97 .
Cited 5 timesPublished10 Ohio St. 2d 242 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1967
A majority of this court, upon examination of the record, agrees with the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals and is further of the opinion that the principles announced in the case of Cantor v. … Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 22 timesPublished53 Ohio St. 3d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1990
This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Knox County in Beck v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna