Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.61s
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Noll
105 Ohio St. 3d 6 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2004
Bar Assn. v. Noll, 105 Ohio St.3d 6, 2004-Ohio-7013.] LORAIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. NOLL. [Cite as Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Noll, 105 Ohio St.3d 6, 2004-Ohio-7013.] … Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 401, 404, 618 N.E.2d 159.
Cited 2 timesPublished74 Ohio St. 3d 585 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1996
A panel appointed by the board heard the matter on relator’s motion for default, filed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F). … V(4)(G).
Cited 1 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bozanich
95 Ohio St. 3d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2002
Respondent answered, and the matter was referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). … V(4)(G) (no attorney shall neglect or refuse to assist or testify *111 in an investigation or hearing).
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Application of Notestine
2025 Ohio 2415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 8, 2025
Notestine submitted with her NCBE questionnaire a certified copy of the hearing examiner’s report, excerpts from the minutes of the board meeting, and the board’s order. 6 … Co. v. J.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeneral Data Corp. v. Porterfield
21 Ohio St. 2d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1970
See Alside v. Bowers, 174 Ohio St. 463 . … See Jewel Companies, Inc., v. Porterfield, 21 Ohio St. 2d 97 .
Cited 5 timesPublished145 Ohio St. 441 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1945
Adsmond , v. Board of Education of Williams County School Dist. , 135 Ohio St. 383 , 21 N.E.2d 94 , State, ex rel. Misamore , v. Hancock County Board of Education , 135 Ohio St. 394 , 21 N.E.2d 99 , and State, ex rel. … Nimberger , v.
Cited 0 timesPublished104 Ohio St. 3d 322 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004
Perry v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., Franklin App. … Cotton v. Ghee (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 54, 55 , 701 N.E.2d 989 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedColumbus Bar Ass'n v. Blankenship
85 Ohio St. 3d 1211 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1999
V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(9).
Cited 1 timesPublished10 Ohio St. 2d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1967
We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Overruled by State ex rel. Tyler v. Alexander, 52 Ohio St. 3d 84 (1990)Cited 12 timesPublishedCleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cicirella
86 Ohio St. 3d 544 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. … See Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Rollins (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 408 , 704 N.E.2d 1210 . The board was justified in relying on the lack of such pattern to impose a lesser sanction.
Cited 8 timesPublished61 Ohio St. 2d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980
Co. v. Deitsch (1934), 127 Ohio St. 505, 510 . In Canton Morris Plan Bank v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and Holmes, J., dissent.
Cited 66 timesPublishedWheeler v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.
92 Ohio St. 3d 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 2001
The discretionary appeal is allowed and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425 , 746 N.E.2d 1077 , and Clark v. … Brown, Bemiller, Murray & McIntyre, L.L.P., and J. Jeffrey Heck, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in judgment.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Spadafora v. Toledo City Council
71 Ohio St. 3d 546 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1994
Watkins v. … Concerned Citizens for More Professional Govt. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished123 Ohio St. 42 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1930
Gen., v. Peters, 43 Ohio St., 629 , 4 N. … See, also, Woods v. State, 130 Tenn., 100 , 169 S. W., 558 , L. R. A., 1915F, page 531, where the cases are collected.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff
84 Ohio St. 3d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1998
CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEARDORFF. CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION V. HAAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Deardorff, 1998-Ohio-311.] … He testified that he then threw the board aside, SUPREME COURT OF OHIO flipping it into the air, but not at St. Paul. St. Paul testified that the board struck her on the hip. St.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBedford Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
112 Ohio St. 3d 1425 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 2007
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2004r-V-1310 and 2004-V-1311. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. … Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to consolidate this case with 2005-2311, Bedford Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Martin v. Industrial Commission
55 Ohio St. 2d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978
Benton, v. C. &. So. O. Elec. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., and Herbert, J., concur in the judgment.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury
80 Ohio St. 3d 1204 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1997
V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the cost of publication. For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Cedeno v. Industrial Commission
127 Ohio St. 3d 212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2010
Cedeno v. Indus. Comm., 127 Ohio St.3d 212, 2010-Ohio-5677.] THE STATE EX REL. CEDENO, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. ______________________ Plevin & Gallucci and Frank Gallucci III; and Paul W.
Cited 0 timesPublished145 Ohio St. 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1945
Section 5546-9a, General Code, provides that a vendor or consumer may appeal to the *217 Board of Tax Appeals “in the same timé, manner and form as that provided in Section 5611 of the General Code of Ohio.” … In the instant case, as stated in the per curiam opinion in Kinsman Square Drug Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., ante, 52, at page 54, 60 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna