Case law

State ex rel. Harris v. Industrial Commission

12 Ohio St. 3d 152 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1984

Mees, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 128, 130 [ 58 O.O.2d 319 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Westlake Med. Investors, L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 547 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1996

WESTLAKE MEDICAL INVESTORS, L.P., APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Westlake Med. Investors, L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203, 542 N.E.2d 650, 651.

Lincoln Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Warren

13 Ohio St. 2d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1968

The Board of Tax Appeals denied the application. … The same position was taken in Jones v. Conn, 116 Ohio St. 1, 14 , 155 N. E. 791, 795 .

State v. Williamson

10 Ohio St. 2d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1967

We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Atkinson

138 Ohio St. 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1941

Longano, v. Industrial Commission, 135 Ohio St., 165 , 20 N. E. (2d), 230; State, ex rel. Podley, v. Industrial Commission, 127 Ohio St., 583 , 190 N. E., 407 ; Industrial Commission v. Vail, 110 Ohio St., 304 , 143 N. … Andrews et al., Board of Commrs., v. Zangerle, And., 101 Ohio St., 235 , 128 N. E., 165 . Yet no particular form of expression is essential to show express intent.

State ex rel. St. Francis—St. George Hospital v. Industrial Commission

70 Ohio St. 3d 498 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1994

Marks v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 184 , 586 N.E.2d 109 , on which claimant relies, differs from this case. … Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 170 , 532 N.E.2d 748 ; State ex rel. Litten v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 178 , 602 N.E.2d 624 .

State v. Mazes

7 Ohio St. 2d 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1966

A Book v. Attorney General of Massachusetts (March 21, 1966), 16 L. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Canfield

92 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 2001

GEAUGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CANFIELD. [Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Canfield, 2001-Ohio-138.] … Respondent filed his answer, and the matter was scheduled to be heard by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”).

Huron Fish Co. v. Glander

146 Ohio St. 631 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1946

All contested items of this audit and the other audits before this board are items used in the catching of fish in the lake.” … In the ease of Moore et al., Tax Comm., v.

Mahoning Cnty. Bar Assn v. Verkhlin

2018 Ohio 1485 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 2018

This matter is remanded to the board of professional conduct for default proceedings pursuant to Gov.Bar.R. V(14)(F). … The interim default suspension imposed against respondent on January 11, 2018, shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board.

Ohio Region Senior Citizens Hous. Corp. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

1994 Ohio 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1994

Ohio Region Senior Citizens Housing Corp., Appellant v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Ohio Region Senior Citizens Hous. Corp. v. Franklin Cty. … In Dinner Bell Meats, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep

74 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1995

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ESTEP. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Estep, 1995-Ohio-258.] … Green v. Huntington Natl.

State v. Vondenberg

61 Ohio St. 2d 285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1980

See State v. Dye (1968), 14 Ohio App. 2d 7 . Effective January 1, 1974, R. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Glander

153 Ohio St. 191 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1950

The appeals in the instant cases are from the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, hence the method followed by the Tax Commissioner is immaterial here. In the case of Clark v. … The board seriously questions the credibility of this particular evidence. ’ ’ In the case of Pullman’s Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S., 18, 26 , 35 L. Ed., 613 , 11 S. Ct., 876 , Mr.

State ex rel. Griffin v. Doe (Slip Opinion)

165 Ohio St. 3d 577 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2021

Miller v. Ohio State Hwy. … Ware v. Giavasis, 163 Ohio St.3d 359, 2020-Ohio-5453, 170 N.E.3d 788, ¶ 32; see also State ex rel. Pietrangelo v.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye

82 Ohio St. 3d 64 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1998

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. DYE. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dye, 1998-Ohio-266.] … relator, Columbus Bar Association, filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) against respondent, Lewis William Dye of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration

State ex rel. Muhammad v. State

133 Ohio St. 3d 508 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2012

Castro v. … Wells v. Jefferson Cty.

Ford v. Ideal Aluminum, Inc.

7 Ohio St. 2d 9 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1966

See Knowlson v. Bellman, 160 Ohio St. 359 , 116 N. E. 2d 430 ; State, ex rel. Heights Jewish Center, v. Haake, 165 Ohio St. 547 , 138 N. E. 2d 401 ; State, ex rel. Cliffview Land Co., v. … J., and Brown, J., dissent.

Wiedle v. Remmel

42 Ohio St. 2d 335 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1975

Norris v. Jones (1924), 110 Ohio St. 598 ; Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co. (1946), 146 Ohio St 657; 6A Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 463, Automobiles, Section 407. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Conrad

94 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2002

STARK COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CONRAD. [Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Conrad, 2002-Ohio-644.] … V(7)(C) provides: “If the complaint or answer alleges existing mental illness unsupported by a journal entry of a court of competent jurisdiction or mental illness otherwise is placed in issue, the Board or hearing