Case law

State ex rel. Clink v. Smith

16 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1968

Osborn v. City of Whittier, 103 Cal. App. 2d 609 , 230 P. 2d 132 , and Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Courtenay Farmers Co-op. Assn., 64 N. D. 253 , 251 N. W. 881 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Doyle, Schneider and BROWN, JJ., concur. . Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District sitting for Herbert, J.

Central National Bank v. Fitzwilliam

12 Ohio St. 3d 51 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1984

See Donvito v. Criswell, supra, at 56 , and Koster v. Boudreaux, supra. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez

97 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2002

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SUAREZ. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez, 2002-Ohio-5935.] … On credibility issues, we generally defer to the panel’s and board’s determinations. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 191, 198, 754 N.E.2d 235.

City of Oregon v. Dansack

68 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1993

of Control, Municipal Tax Commissions, Boards of Trustees of Public Affairs, Boards of Cemetery Trustees, Recreation Boards, or any other municipal commission, board or body now or hereafter created by law, except as otherwise … Bd. of Edn. v. State ex rel.

Fair v. Maxwell

2 Ohio St. 2d 151 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1965

Rodriguez v. Sacks, Warden, 173 Ohio St. 456 . Petitioner’s other contentions are refuted by the record. … Madison v. Maxwell, Warden, 177 Ohio St. 84 , and McQueen v. Maxwell, Warden, 177 Ohio St. 30 . Petitioner remanded to custody. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Hebbeet, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley

82 Ohio St. 3d 261 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1998

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BRADLEY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bradley, 1998-Ohio-236.] … After respondent filed his answer, the matter was submitted to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”).

State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Atkinson

138 Ohio St. 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1941

Longano, v. Industrial Commission, 135 Ohio St., 165 , 20 N. E. (2d), 230; State, ex rel. Podley, v. Industrial Commission, 127 Ohio St., 583 , 190 N. E., 407 ; Industrial Commission v. Vail, 110 Ohio St., 304 , 143 N. … Andrews et al., Board of Commrs., v. Zangerle, And., 101 Ohio St., 235 , 128 N. E., 165 . Yet no particular form of expression is essential to show express intent.

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Hoglan

64 Ohio St. (N.S.) 532 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1901

The construction placed on it by the mayor is that it requires' the board to furnish the names of three such persons, or at least two and for the refusal of the' board to adopt his construction he made the order of removal … State v. Hawkins, 44 *546 Ohio St., 98; State v. Bryson, 44 Ohio St., 457 ; State v. McLain, 58 Ohio St., 313 ; State v. Sullivan, 58 id., 513.

State Ex Rel. Miami Conservancy District v. Baden

130 Ohio St. 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1935

District is a corporation under the laws of Ohio and, while it is given many powers not common with other corporations, the act creating conservancy districts was held to be constitutional in the case of County of Miami v. … And tbe board may institute such proceedings in tbe court of appeals in tbe first instance.”

Thomas v. Newark City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

71 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1994

THOMAS, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE NEWARK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLEE. [Cite as Thomas v. Newark City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 1994-Ohio-18.] … See Farmer v.

Workman v. Shiplevy

80 Ohio St. 3d 174 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1997

Brown v. Rogers (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 340-341 , 650 N.E.2d 422, 423 . … Bloss v. Rogers (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 145, 146 , 602 N.E.2d 602 .

State ex rel. Fogle v. Richley

55 Ohio St. 2d 142 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1978

See Hatch v. C. & I. R. R. Co. (1868), 18 Ohio St. 92 , Vought v. C. H. V. & A. R. R. Co. (1898), 58 Ohio St. 123 , Red River T. &. S. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App. 1917), 195 S. W. 1160 ; and Abercrombie v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze and W. Brown, JJ., concur separately. See Hatch v. C. & 1. R. R.

Vandriest v. Midlem

6 Ohio St. 3d 183 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983

This court considered a related issue in Daniels v. MacGregor Co. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 89 [ 31 O.O.2d 141 ], and Campbell v. Central Terminal Warehouse (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 173 [ 10 O.O.3d 342 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur separately. Celebrezze, C.J., C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

State v. McClendon

128 Ohio St. 3d 354 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2011

[Cite as State v. McClendon, 128 Ohio St.3d 354, 2011-Ohio-954.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MCCLENDON, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. … LANZINGER and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J.

State ex rel. Griffin v. Doe (Slip Opinion)

165 Ohio St. 3d 577 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2021

Miller v. Ohio State Hwy. … Ware v. Giavasis, 163 Ohio St.3d 359, 2020-Ohio-5453, 170 N.E.3d 788, ¶ 32; see also State ex rel. Pietrangelo v.

State ex rel. Williams v. Bessey

125 Ohio St. 3d 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 2010

Williams v. Bessey, 125 Ohio St.3d 447, 2010-Ohio-2113.] THE STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. BESSEY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Williams v. … Carr v. McDonnell, 124 Ohio St.3d 62, 2009-Ohio-6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004; State ex rel. Key v.

Caruso v. Aluminum Co. of America

15 Ohio St. 3d 306 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

In Kinney v. … Brown, J.

General Electric Co. v. DeCourcy

60 Ohio St. 2d 68 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1979

Cleveland Concession Co., v. … Brown, P. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur.

Woman's International Bowling Congress, Inc. v. Porterfield

25 Ohio St. 2d 271 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1971

Terteling Bros. v. Glander (1949), 151 Ohio St. 236 , 85 N. E. 2d 379 . See, also, Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. Board of Revision (1950), 152 Ohio St. 521, 533 , 90 N. E. 2d 574 . … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals affirming the Tax Commissioner’s use tax assessment against appellant, being neither unreasonable nor unlawful, must be affirmed. Decision affirmed. O’Neill, C.

Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows

78 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1997

MIAMI COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. HALLOWS. [Cite as Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows, 1997-Ohio-237.] … Columbus Bar Assn. v.