Case law

Fenton v. American Liability Co.

123 Ohio St. 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1930

No, no; his body was under the door, and on the running board. “Q. His body of course, was down on the running board? A. Yes, sir. ££Q. … Clarkson v. Union Mutual Casualty Co., 201 Iowa, 1249 , 207 N. W., 132 ; National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Braswell, 209 Ky., 165 , 272 S. W., 413 ; Dunwoody v. Royal Indemnity Co., 218 Mich., 358 , 188 N.

State v. Nelson

36 Ohio St. 2d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1973

See Blackburn v. State (1872), 23 Ohio St. 146 ; Wertenberger v. State (1919), 99 Ohio St. 353 ; Grossweiler v. State (1925), 113 Ohio St. 46 ; State v. Barron (1960), 170 Ohio St. 267 ; State v. … Brown, JJ., concur. CorrigaN and P. Brown, JJ., concur in paragraph one of the syllabus and the judgment. There is a division of opinion amongst the states.

State Ex Rel. Boyd v. Schneider

147 Ohio St. 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1946

Set out in the petition are sections 21 and 31 of the rules and bylaws of. the board of trustees of the police relief fund, which sections, it is averred, were duly adopted by the board of trustees and were in full force … Slovensky, v. Taylor, Dir., 135 Ohio St., 601 , 21 N. E. (2d), 990; State, ex rel. Hein, v. Cull et al., Civil Service Comm., 135 Ohio St., 602 , 21 N. E. (2d), 991; State, ex rel. Conway, v.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. McClain

99 Ohio St. 3d 248 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2003

We defer to the board’s findings of fact on these issues. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

1994 Ohio 498 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1994

Cleveland Board of Education, Appellee and Cross-Appellant; Roc Syl Associates, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision. [Cite as Cleveland Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … The sockdolager to the school board's dispute over the true value determination of the subject property is, as stated in Zindle v. Summit Cty.

State v. Ellis

62 Ohio St. 3d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1991

The judgment appealed from, 1991 WL 76768 , is reversed and the cause is remanded on authority of Columbus v. Cooper (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 42 , 550 N.E.2d 937 . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

In re Zamensky

176 Ohio St. 3d 1203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2024

V(18)(A)(3), the director of the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child- support order by Andrew Melvin Zamensky, an attorney … V(23)(A)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board

State ex rel. Williams v. Bessey

125 Ohio St. 3d 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 2010

Williams v. Bessey, 125 Ohio St.3d 447, 2010-Ohio-2113.] THE STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. BESSEY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Williams v. … Carr v. McDonnell, 124 Ohio St.3d 62, 2009-Ohio-6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004; State ex rel. Key v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Taubman

136 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2013

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Taubman, 136 Ohio St.3d 312, 2013-Ohio-3704.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TAUBMAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board refers to similar disciplinary cases in support of its recommendation, including Disciplinary Counsel v.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Brunner

91 Ohio St. 3d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 2001

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BRUNNER. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Brunner, 2001-Ohio-82.] … The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel. {¶ 7} We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez

97 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2002

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SUAREZ. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez, 2002-Ohio-5935.] … On credibility issues, we generally defer to the panel’s and board’s determinations. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 191, 198, 754 N.E.2d 235.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo

89 Ohio St. 3d 1218 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2000

V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for’in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Corrigan v. Lawther

39 Ohio St. 3d 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1988

Zoller, v. Talbert (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 329 , 16 O.O. 3d 391, 405 N.E. 2d 724 ; State, ex rel. Leis, v. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Watkins

94 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2001

Bar Assn. v. Watkins, 94 Ohio St.3d 14, 2001-Ohio-6976.] STARK COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATKINS. [Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Watkins (2001), 94 Ohio St.3d 14.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”).

State ex rel. Fogle v. Richley

55 Ohio St. 2d 142 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1978

See Hatch v. C. & I. R. R. Co. (1868), 18 Ohio St. 92 , Vought v. C. H. V. & A. R. R. Co. (1898), 58 Ohio St. 123 , Red River T. &. S. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App. 1917), 195 S. W. 1160 ; and Abercrombie v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze and W. Brown, JJ., concur separately. See Hatch v. C. & 1. R. R.

State ex rel. Williams Ford Sales, Inc. v. Connor

72 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1995

Seikbert v. … Carter v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Cromwell

82 Ohio St. 3d 255 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1998

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fehler-Schultz (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 452 , 597 N.E.2d 79 ; Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. George (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 267 , 74 O.O.2d 425 , 344 N.E.2d 132 .

State ex rel. Falke v. Montgomery County Residential Development, Inc.

40 Ohio St. 3d 71 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1988

Gen., v. Lee (1871), 21 Ohio St. 662 ; State, ex rel. Atty. Gen., v. Central Ohio Mut. Relief Assn. (1876), 29 Ohio St. 399 ; State, ex rel. Brown, v. Regional Pub. … See Gaff v. Flesher (1877), 33 Ohio St. 107 , 115; Society Perun v. Cleveland (1885), 43 Ohio St. 481 , at paragraphs one, two and five of the syllabus.

Boling v. Young

38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

Duchwall v. Rodgers, 15 Ohio St. 544 . … Baker v. Cincinnati, 11 Ohio St. 534 ; Denier v. Jenkins, 20 Ohio St. 336 ; Stephan v. Daniels, 27 Ohio St. 527 . Judgment of the district cout't affirmed.

Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Grander

149 Ohio St. 120 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1948

See Matz, Admr., v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co., 132 Ohio St., 271, 278, 279 , 7 N. E. (2d), 220; Coady v. Leonard et al., Board of Liquor Control, 132 Ohio St., 329 , 7 N. E. (2d), 649; A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. … While an appeal from that assessment was pending before the Board of Tax Appeals and before an appeal was taken to this court in the case of Huron Fish Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr., 146 Ohio St., 631 , 67 N.