Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.33s

  • Kalmbach Wagner Swine Research Farm v. Wyandot Cty. Bd. of Revision

    81 Ohio St. 3d 319 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1998

    KALMBACH WAGNER SWINE RESEARCH FARM, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF WYANDOT COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Kalmbach Wagner Swine Research Farm v. Wyandot Cty. … ¶ 12} In Snavely v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Boyd v. Schneider

    147 Ohio St. 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1946

    Set out in the petition are sections 21 and 31 of the rules and bylaws of. the board of trustees of the police relief fund, which sections, it is averred, were duly adopted by the board of trustees and were in full force … Slovensky, v. Taylor, Dir., 135 Ohio St., 601 , 21 N. E. (2d), 990; State, ex rel. Hein, v. Cull et al., Civil Service Comm., 135 Ohio St., 602 , 21 N. E. (2d), 991; State, ex rel. Conway, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. McClain

    99 Ohio St. 3d 248 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2003

    We defer to the board’s findings of fact on these issues. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Ellis

    62 Ohio St. 3d 106 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1991

    The judgment appealed from, 1991 WL 76768 , is reversed and the cause is remanded on authority of Columbus v. Cooper (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 42 , 550 N.E.2d 937 . Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Zamensky

    176 Ohio St. 3d 1203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2024

    V(18)(A)(3), the director of the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child- support order by Andrew Melvin Zamensky, an attorney … V(23)(A)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Williams v. Bessey

    125 Ohio St. 3d 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 2010

    Williams v. Bessey, 125 Ohio St.3d 447, 2010-Ohio-2113.] THE STATE EX REL. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. BESSEY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Williams v. … Carr v. McDonnell, 124 Ohio St.3d 62, 2009-Ohio-6165, 918 N.E.2d 1004; State ex rel. Key v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Taubman

    136 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2013

    [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Taubman, 136 Ohio St.3d 312, 2013-Ohio-3704.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TAUBMAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board refers to similar disciplinary cases in support of its recommendation, including Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Assn. v. Brunner

    91 Ohio St. 3d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 2001

    DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BRUNNER. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Brunner, 2001-Ohio-82.] … The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel. {¶ 7} We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Nelson

    36 Ohio St. 2d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1973

    See Blackburn v. State (1872), 23 Ohio St. 146 ; Wertenberger v. State (1919), 99 Ohio St. 353 ; Grossweiler v. State (1925), 113 Ohio St. 46 ; State v. Barron (1960), 170 Ohio St. 267 ; State v. … Brown, JJ., concur. CorrigaN and P. Brown, JJ., concur in paragraph one of the syllabus and the judgment. There is a division of opinion amongst the states.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St. 3d 19 (1982)Cited 95 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez

    97 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2002

    DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SUAREZ. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Suarez, 2002-Ohio-5935.] … On credibility issues, we generally defer to the panel’s and board’s determinations. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 191, 198, 754 N.E.2d 235.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo

    89 Ohio St. 3d 1218 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 2000

    V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. … V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for’in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Corrigan v. Lawther

    39 Ohio St. 3d 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1988

    Zoller, v. Talbert (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 329 , 16 O.O. 3d 391, 405 N.E. 2d 724 ; State, ex rel. Leis, v. … Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Watkins

    94 Ohio St. 3d 14 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2001

    Bar Assn. v. Watkins, 94 Ohio St.3d 14, 2001-Ohio-6976.] STARK COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. WATKINS. [Cite as Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Watkins (2001), 94 Ohio St.3d 14.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Fogle v. Richley

    55 Ohio St. 2d 142 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1978

    See Hatch v. C. & I. R. R. Co. (1868), 18 Ohio St. 92 , Vought v. C. H. V. & A. R. R. Co. (1898), 58 Ohio St. 123 , Red River T. &. S. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex. Civ. App. 1917), 195 S. W. 1160 ; and Abercrombie v. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze and W. Brown, JJ., concur separately. See Hatch v. C. & 1. R. R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Creswell v. Nesbitt

    16 Ohio St. (N.S.) 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1864

    of education, under the direction of the board; but, in paying teachers, the clerk may draw the order without direction of the board. … What is the effect, then, of these superadded or substituted words—“ on the order of the hoard of education V' I incline to think they may be wholly rejected as surplusage.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boling v. Young

    38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Duchwall v. Rodgers, 15 Ohio St. 544 . … Baker v. Cincinnati, 11 Ohio St. 534 ; Denier v. Jenkins, 20 Ohio St. 336 ; Stephan v. Daniels, 27 Ohio St. 527 . Judgment of the district cout't affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Grander

    149 Ohio St. 120 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1948

    See Matz, Admr., v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co., 132 Ohio St., 271, 278, 279 , 7 N. E. (2d), 220; Coady v. Leonard et al., Board of Liquor Control, 132 Ohio St., 329 , 7 N. E. (2d), 649; A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. … While an appeal from that assessment was pending before the Board of Tax Appeals and before an appeal was taken to this court in the case of Huron Fish Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr., 146 Ohio St., 631 , 67 N.

    Overruled on other grounds by Fichtel & Sachs Industries, Inc. v. Wilkins, 108 Ohio St. 3d 106 (2006)Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Rosen

    144 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2015

    SLIP OPINION NO. 2015-OHIO-3420 DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROSEN. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Disciplinary Counsel v. … See Disciplinary Counsel v. Mecklenborg, 139 Ohio St.3d 411, 2014-Ohio-1908, 12 N.E.3d 411 1 Effective January 1, 2015, Gov.Bar R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wetterstroem v. Department of Liquor Control

    129 Ohio St. 185 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1935

    Relying upon the holding in the case of State v. Hutchinson, 56 Ohio St., 82 , 46 N. … City of Cincinnati v. Holmes, Admr., 56 Ohio St., 104 , 46 N. E., 514 ; Thomas, Sheriff, v. Evans, 73 Ohio St., 140 , 76 N. E., 862 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of Oregon v. Dansack

    68 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1993

    of Control, Municipal Tax Commissions, Boards of Trustees of Public Affairs, Boards of Cemetery Trustees, Recreation Boards, or any other municipal commission, board or body now or hereafter created by law, except as otherwise … Bd. of Edn. v. State ex rel.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.