Case law

State v. Ruff

143 Ohio St. 3d 114 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2015

See State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 , 2010-Ohio-6314 , 942 N.E.2d 1061 , ¶ 48-50 (lead opinion per Brown, C.J.). … , C.J.), quoting State v.

Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows

78 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1997

MIAMI COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. HALLOWS. [Cite as Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hallows, 1997-Ohio-237.] … Columbus Bar Assn. v.

M/I Homes of Cincinnati, L.L.C. v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Revision

128 Ohio St. 3d 1453 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2011

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2009-V-3796. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. … Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement the settlement agreement of the parties.

Machinery Moving, Inc. v. Porterfield

26 Ohio St. 2d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1971

The court said: “These cases are unlike Pla Mor, Inc., v. Glander, 149 Ohio St. 295 , or Randall Park Jockey Club, Inc., v. … In Bunker-Ramo Corp. v. Porterfield (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 231 , this court held that the rental of electronic equipment, known as “quote boards,” is a taxable transaction under R.

State ex rel. Cupp v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 3d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1991

Johnson, v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 339 , 533 N.E. 2d 720 . Similar action is warranted here. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DiAlbert

98 Ohio St. 3d 386 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2003

V(4)(G). {¶ 5} In recommending a sanction, the panel reviewed the aggravating and mitigating circumstances stipulated to by the parties. … The board adopted the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 7} We agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-101(A)(3) and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G) as found by the board.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Johnson

94 Ohio St. 3d 220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2002

Respondent failed to *221 answer, and the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) referred relator’s amended motion for default to Master Commissioner Harry W. White for ruling. … V(4)(G) (no attorney shall neglect or refuse to assist or testify in an investigation or hearing). The master commissioner recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.

City of Salem v. Harding

121 Ohio St. 412 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1929

of health, or other *418 persons acting under the instructions of the board of health. … The instant case has much in common with the case of City of Portsmouth v. Mitchell Mfg. Co., 113 Ohio St., 250 , 148 N. E., 846, 847 , 43 A. L. R., 961.

Stark & Knoll Properties, L.L.C. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision

127 Ohio St. 3d 1455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2010

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-V-1405. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. … Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the appeal in order to implement a settlement, It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement the

Disciplinary Counsel v. Asante

127 Ohio St. 3d 1495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 7, 2011

The board recommended that the agreement be accepted. … V(8)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for further proceedings, including consideration of a harsher sanction.

State ex rel. Lockhart v. Boberek

45 Ohio St. 2d 292 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1976

Hackley, v. Edmonds (1948), 150 Ohio St. 203, 80 . N. E. 2d 769. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Clarke v. Cook

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

This same doctrine as to inferior boards or commissions was recently laid down in State, ex rel. Locher, Pros. Atty., v. Menning, 95 Ohio St., 97 . … The power not being so granted to the board of education cannot be exercised by the board of education, and its attempted exercise thereof is ultra vires.

Miller v. Korns

107 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1923

Coming to the Ohio cases cited, Root v. Board of Education, 52 Ohio St., 589 , 41 N. E., 135 , and Fields v. … Board of Education v. State, 51 Ohio St., 531 , 38 N. E., 614 , 25 L. R. A., 770, 46 Am. St.

State ex rel. Harris v. Rhodes

54 Ohio St. 2d 41 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1978

National City Bank, v. Bd. of Education (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 81 . Relator asserts that the requested records are “public records” which, pursuant to R. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser

130 Ohio St. 3d 1208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2011

[Cite as Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser, 130 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2011-Ohio-5451.] ARTISAN MECHANICAL, INC., APPELLANT, v. BEISER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., and Timothy G.

State ex rel. Donaldson v. Athens City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

1994 Ohio 495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1994

Donaldson, Appellee, v. Athens City School District Board of Education, Appellant. [Cite as State ex rel. Donaldson v. Athens City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … See Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 190, 61 O.O.2d 425, 291 N.E.2d 462. To successfully invoke the defense of laches, the board must show unreasonable delay and material prejudice. Smith v.

Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1996

MIDDLETON, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1996-Ohio-184.] … Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Presley v. City of Norwood

36 Ohio St. 2d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1973

Anaple v. Standard Oil Co. (1955), 162 Ohio St. 537 ; Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 584 . Appellant argues that Mikula v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the second paragraph of the syllabus and in the judgment.

State v. Pussycat Cinex

36 Ohio St. 2d 108 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1973

Hale v. Henkle (1906)), 201 U. S. 43 ; Wilson v. United States (1911), 221 U. S. 361 ; Essgee Co. v. United States (1923), 262 U. S. 151 ; Curcio v. United States (1957), 354 U. S. 118 . Likewise, in McPhaul v. … BrowN and P. BrowN, JJ., concur.

Masheter v. Kebe

49 Ohio St. 2d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1976

In support of this declared proposition of law, appellant cites the decisions of this court in Masheter v. Wood (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 175 , and Bd. of County Commrs. v. … Brown.' and P. Brown, JJ., concur. A:;.' A 0 ’Neill; C. J., dissents. StillmanV J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Stern, J.