Case law

Cox v. Maxwell

1 Ohio St. 2d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1965

Armstrong v. Haskins, Supt., 176 Ohio St. 422 ; and Cline v. Haskins, Supt., 175 Ohio St. 480 . Thus, petitioner’s sentence has not expired although more than 15 years have elapsed since the imposition thereof. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Patterson

86 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1999

V(6)(F), and relator’s motion for default judgment was considered by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). {¶ 2} Based on the complaint and exhibits attached … Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bucio

161 Ohio St. 3d 1240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2020

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bucio, 2020-Ohio-4841.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BUCIO. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Bucio, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4841.] … V(25)(E), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct.

State v. McBreen

54 Ohio St. 2d 315 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1978

In State v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and. Locher, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the syllabus and the judgment.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hines

128 Ohio St. 3d 1437 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 2011

On February 24, 2011, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed a final report in the office of the Clerk of this court pursuant to BCGD Proc.Reg. 11(D), in which it accepted the agreement entered into … V(8)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for further proceedings. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.

Mosely v. Echols

62 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1991

McGhee (1987), 37 Ohio App.3d 54 , 523 N.E.2d 864 , and State v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

S. Euclid/Lyndhurst Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1996

SOUTH EUCLID/LYNDHURST BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION; C.I.A. PROPERTIES, APPELLANT. [Cite as S. Euclid/Lyndhurst Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … As we stated in Wolf v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. Legal Aid State Services, Inc.

109 Ohio St. 3d 93 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 2006

See, e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Misch (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 256, 259 , 695 N.E.2d 244 ; Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23 , 1 O.O. 313 , 193 N.E. 650 , paragraph one of the syllabus. … Bar Assn. v. Clapp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 276, 278 , 703 N.E.2d 771 ; Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

M. J. Kelly Co. v. Haendiges

58 Ohio St. 2d 505 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1979

Robert V. Clapp Co. v. Fox (1931), 124 Ohio St. 331, 335 . R. … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. P. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Leigh v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

76 Ohio St. 3d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1996

LEIGH, APPELLANT, v. STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Leigh v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 1996-Ohio-416.] … Brenders v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shrode

95 Ohio St. 3d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 1, 2002

The board recommended that respondent be enjoined from further such activity. {¶ 6} On review of the record, we accept the facts as found by the board. In Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. … Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Deters (Slip Opinion)

165 Ohio St. 3d 537 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2021

Bar Assn. v. … In fact, the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has dismissed complaints alleging violations for such conduct. See Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel

62 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1992

Scanlon, v. Deters (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 376, 379 , 544 N.E.2d 680, 683 . The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Wilmot v. Buckley

60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 273 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1899

As in shown in Nelson v. … State v. Bargus, 53 Ohio St., 94 ; Hixson v. Burson, 54 Ohio St., 470 ; Mott v. Hubbard, 59 Ohio St., 199 ; Kelley v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Caliman

83 Ohio St. 3d 461 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1998

We therefore adopt the conclusion of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). In Disciplinary Counsel v. … In this case the board recommended that respondent be suspended for six months with the suspension stayed. That recommendation does not follow the Fowerbaugh ■ prescription of “actual suspension.”

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cicirella

94 Ohio St. 3d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2002

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CICIRELLA. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cicirella, 2002-Ohio-643.] … Respondent did not answer, and the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) referred the matter to Master Commissioner Harry W.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield

75 Ohio St. 3d 527 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1996

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. WINKFIELD. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Winkfield, 1996-Ohio-458.] … I, therefore, would impose the sanction recommended by the board.

State v. Byrd

63 Ohio St. 2d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1980

In Machibroda v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Bridges v. McMackin

44 Ohio St. 3d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1989

Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141,149 , 40 O.O. 2d 141,146, 228 N.E. 2d 631, 639-640 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Bonewitz v. Van Wert County Bank

41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

Stats, § 3260 ; Wright v. McCormick, 17 Ohio St., 86 ; Winsted v. Buskirk, Id., 113 ; Brown v. Hitchcock, 36 Id., 667; Wheeler v. Faurot, 37 Id., 26. … Brown v. Hitchcock, 36 Ohio St., 667 . Judgment reversed.