Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

3.41s

  • Alfred v. Traber

    20 Ohio St. 540 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1851

    Brown & Co. v. Webb, 20 Ohio. Ohio Life Ins. and Trust Co. v. Reeder, 18 Ohio, 35; Greene v. Ramage, 18 Ohio, 428 ; 14 Ohio, 365. See Mitchell v. Gazzam, 12 Ohio, 335, per Read, J. … Kellogg, 11 Ohio, 394; and see upon this subject, and the construction of the act of March 14, 1838 (Swan’s Stat. 717), the authorities referred to in the note to Brown & Co. v. Webb, 20 Ohio. See Brown & Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.

    69 Ohio St. 2d 376 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1982

    Brown, Sweeney, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur. See Ins. Co. v. … See, e.g., Lloyd v.

    Cited 203 timesPublished
  • State v. Strodes

    48 Ohio St. 2d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1976

    United States v. Kelly (1965), 349 F. 2d 720 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Vacated on other grounds by Jordan v. Arizona, 438 U.S. 911 (1978)Cited 56 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Turrin v. County Court

    5 Ohio St. 2d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1966

    See City of Columbus v. Nappi, 5 Ohio St. 2d 99 . Judgments affirmed. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley

    104 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2004

    Disciplinary Counsel v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Red Fox Stables, Inc. v. Porterfield

    28 Ohio St. 2d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1972

    We have examined the pertinent statutes and the definition of “agriculture” as set forth by the Board of Tax Appeals in Yoder Bros. v. Bowers (1959), 169 Ohio St. 211 . … That definition was expanded by this court in Benken v. Porterfield (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 133 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Natl. Church Residence v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision

    73 Ohio St. 3d 397 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1995

    NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCE, APPELLANT, v. LICKING COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Natl. Church Residence v. Licking Cty. … Webb Corp. v. Lucas Cty.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Rd. v. Court of Common Pleas

    11 Ohio St. 2d 193 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1967

    Mansfield Telephone Co., v. … J., ZimmermaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Morris v. City Council

    71 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1994

    A city council’s authority to determine if all applicable statutory requirements have been met is therefore more restricted than that of a board of elections. See State ex rel. Watkins v. … State ex rel. v. Lemon (C.P.1925), 26 Ohio N.P.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Sawers

    121 Ohio St. 3d 229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 3, 2009

    A panel of the board considered the case on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement. … See Toledo Bar Assn. v. Johnson, 121 Ohio SUd 226, 2009-Ohio-777 , 903 N.E.2d 306 . .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

    6 Ohio St. 3d 377 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

    In Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and Locher, J., dissent.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Muttalib

    90 Ohio St. 3d 529 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 3, 2001

    V(4)(G) (failing to cooperate with disciplinary investigation). Relator recommended that the court permanently disbar respondent, and a majority of the panel agreed. … Because mail service on respondent was unsuccessful, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline served the Clerk of the Supreme Court with the complaint and the motion for default under Gov.Bar R. V(11)(B).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Vild

    109 Ohio St. 3d 208 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 17, 2006

    V(4)(G). … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Sargent

    41 Ohio St. 2d 85 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1975

    McGoon v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Chiofalo

    112 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

    [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Chiofalo, 112 Ohio St.3d 113, 2006-Ohio-6512.] OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. CHIOFALO ET AL. [Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. … See Swanton v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Workman v. McGrath

    40 Ohio St. 3d 91 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1988

    See State v. Perdue (1981), 2 Ohio App. 3d 285 ; State v. Knight (Aug. 20, 1981), Franklin App. No. 81AP-274, unreported. “Writ denied.” Therefore, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. … Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes, Inc. v. Barry

    56 Ohio St. 3d 120 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1990

    Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth [1972], 408 U.S. 564 , 577 * * *. … See Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida [1982], 457 U.S. 496 , 516 * * *.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ass'n of Realtors v. Public Utilities Commission

    60 Ohio St. 2d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1979

    C. 4909.19, concluded in Committee Against MRT v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 231 , that it was mandatory to set forth the fact of the measured rate service proposal within the official publication. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of South Euclid v. Jemison

    28 Ohio St. 3d 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1986

    Shafer, v. … See Euclid v.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Heisler

    119 Ohio St. 3d 573 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2008

    Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … V(10)(A), his proof of compliance with our order in Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Heisler, 116 Ohio St.3d 1448 , 2007-Ohio-6842 , 878 N.E.2d 27 . Costs are taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.