Case law

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

67 Ohio St. 2d 303 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 230 ; C & SOE v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 120 ; Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Pub. Util. … Illuminating Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., supra. Accordingly, the order of the commission is affirmed. Order affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Parks v. Garnes

49 Ohio St. 2d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1977

This remedy has judicial sanction from this court (see United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Doyle [1958], 168 Ohio St. 324 , 327), and nothing in California Dept, of Human Resources v. Java, supra, forbids it. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Day, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Eastland Woods v. City of Tallmadge

2 Ohio St. 3d 185 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1983

Co. v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., and C. Brown, J., dissent.

Forest Park Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Revision

124 Ohio St. 3d 1422 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 8, 2010

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-V-2163. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. … Upon consideration of the joint motion of the parties to remand this cause to the Board of Tax Appeals, It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jaffe

102 Ohio St. 3d 273 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2004

And as to Count V, the panel found that respondent had violated DR 9~102(A). … As the board noted, we imposed a similar limited suspension in Disciplinary Counsel v.

Plaugher v. Oniala

132 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2012

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for application of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 131 Ohio St.3d 235 , 2012-Ohio-552 , 963 N.E.2d 1270 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews and Donald P. Wiley, for appellant, Ethan David Knowles.

State ex rel. Cartwright v. Ohio Adult Parole Bd.

171 Ohio St. 3d 568 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2023

CARTWRIGHT, APPELLANT , v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE BOARD, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Cartwright v. … Atkins v.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Misch

82 Ohio St. 3d 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1998

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. MISCH. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Misch, 1998-Ohio-413.] … Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken (1934), 129 Ohio St. 23, 28, 1 O.O 313, 315, 193 N.E. 650, 652; Akron Bar Assn. v.

Broadview Savings & Loan Co. v. Buckeye Union Insurance

70 Ohio St. 2d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1982

Broadview argues that the law set forth in the recent case of Hounshell v. American States Ins. Co. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 427 , should apply here. … Brown, Acting C. J., Keefe, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents. Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Celebrezze, C. J.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gambrel

94 Ohio St. 3d 10 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2001

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hartsock, 94 Ohio St.3d 18, 2001-Ohio-6977.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HARTSOCK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hartsock (2001), 94 Ohio St.3d 18.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was submitted to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) on stipulations and exhibits.

State v. Riggenbach

2010 Ohio 6336 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

[Cite as State v. Riggenbach, 128 Ohio St.3d 338, 2010-Ohio-6336.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RIGGENBACH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Riggenbach, 128 Ohio St.3d 338, 2010-Ohio-6336.] … BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

82 Ohio St. 3d 297 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1998

CORPORATE EXCHANGE BUILDINGS IV & V, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Corporate Exchange Bldgs. IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty. … Simmons v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Ross v. Sam W. Emerson Co.

49 Ohio St. 3d 206 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1990

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on authority of Sedar v. Knowlton Constr. Co. (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 193 , 551 N.E. 2d 938 . Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Jansen

138 Ohio St. 3d 212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 18, 2014

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Jansen, 138 Ohio St.3d 212, 2014-Ohio-512.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. JANSEN ET AL. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Jansen, 138 Ohio St.3d 212, 2014-Ohio-512.] … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State v. Davis

134 Ohio St. 3d 592 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2012

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467 , 2012-Ohio-5738 , 983 N.E.2d 341 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van and James M.

Wilfong v. Batdorf

6 Ohio St. 3d 100 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1983

Similar advanced, progressive judicial thought has been expressed in Baker v. McKnight (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 125 , concurring opinion, Clifford F. Brown, J., at page 130; Blankenship v. … Brown, J., at page 618; Bonkowsky v. Bonkowsky (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 152 [ 23 O.O.3d 188 ], dissenting opinion, William B. Brown, J., at page 165; Shroades v.

Emmitt v. Lee

50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 662 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1893

The plaintiff in error cites, and relies upon, the case of Atkinson v. Dailey, 2 Ohio, 213, to show that the lease of 1887 was invalid for want of an acknowledgment. … It is, therefore, plain that the statutory provisions and considerations which induced the decision in Atkinson v. Dailey, cannot be made applicable to this case.

State Ex Rel. Squire v. Frasier

133 Ohio St. 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1938

executive committee appointed by the board. … R., annotation beginning at page 976; Cozad State Bank v. McLaughlin, 128 Neb., 87 , 258 N. W., 36 ; Security National Bank of Tulsa v. Bohnefeld, 131 Okl., 66 , 267 P., 631 ; First National Bank of Hooversville v.

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall

81 Ohio St. 3d 280 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1998

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. SEALL. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Seall, 1998-Ohio-630.] … A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) heard the matter and received evidence in mitigation.

Mishr v. Poland Bd. of Zoning Appeals

76 Ohio St. 3d 238 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1996

MISHR, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF VILLAGE OF POLAND, APPELLANT. [Cite as Mishr v. Poland Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 1996-Ohio-400.] … In Union Oil Co. v.